Gender and cross-country differences in the determinants of sustainable diet intentions: a multigroup analysis of the UK, China, Sweden, and Brazil.
behavioral intentions
country comparisons
diet
gender
structural equation modeling
sustainability
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
received:
14
12
2023
accepted:
09
02
2024
medline:
15
3
2024
pubmed:
15
3
2024
entrez:
15
3
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Gender differences have been identified in both the engagement in and the determinants of sustainable diet behaviours. However, as engagement in pro-environmental behaviours varies across countries, the consistency of gender differences could follow similar patterns. Understanding the factors underlying gender and country differences in diet intentions is important for determining how to promote sustainable diets in different populations. Using survey data from the UK, China, Sweden and Brazil ( The findings show that there are gender differences in the influence of diet-related identity and perceived status of meat consumption, as well as cross-country differences in all factors except subjective norms. Holding a strong diet-related meat identity negatively affected sustainable diet intentions in all groups. Crucially, however, gender differences are not consistent across countries. These results suggest that individuals' intentions to engage in sustainable diet behaviours are influenced by nationally unique gender associations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38487654
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1355969
pmc: PMC10937452
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1355969Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Chard, Bergstad, Steentjes, Poortinga and Demski.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.