Reporting of equity in observational epidemiology: A methodological review.
Journal
Journal of global health
ISSN: 2047-2986
Titre abrégé: J Glob Health
Pays: Scotland
ID NLM: 101578780
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Mar 2024
01 Mar 2024
Historique:
medline:
18
3
2024
pubmed:
16
3
2024
entrez:
16
3
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Observational studies can inform how we understand and address persisting health inequities through the collection, reporting and analysis of health equity factors. However, the extent to which the analysis and reporting of equity-relevant aspects in observational research are generally unknown. Thus, we aimed to systematically evaluate how equity-relevant observational studies reported equity considerations in the study design and analyses. We searched MEDLINE for health equity-relevant observational studies from January 2020 to March 2022, resulting in 16 828 articles. We randomly selected 320 studies, ensuring a balance in focus on populations experiencing inequities, country income settings, and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) topic. We extracted information on study design and analysis methods. The bulk of the studies were conducted in North America (n = 95, 30%), followed by Europe and Central Asia (n = 55, 17%). Half of the studies (n = 171, 53%) addressed general health and well-being, while 49 (15%) focused on mental health conditions. Two-thirds of the studies (n = 220, 69%) were cross-sectional. Eight (3%) engaged with populations experiencing inequities, while 22 (29%) adapted recruitment methods to reach these populations. Further, 67 studies (21%) examined interaction effects primarily related to race or ethnicity (48%). Two-thirds of the studies (72%) adjusted for characteristics associated with inequities, and 18 studies (6%) used flow diagrams to depict how populations experiencing inequities progressed throughout the studies. Despite over 80% of the equity-focused observational studies providing a rationale for a focus on health equity, reporting of study design features relevant to health equity ranged from 0-95%, with over half of the items reported by less than one-quarter of studies. This methodological study is a baseline assessment to inform the development of an equity-focussed reporting guideline for observational studies as an extension of the well-known Strengthening Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guideline.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Observational studies can inform how we understand and address persisting health inequities through the collection, reporting and analysis of health equity factors. However, the extent to which the analysis and reporting of equity-relevant aspects in observational research are generally unknown. Thus, we aimed to systematically evaluate how equity-relevant observational studies reported equity considerations in the study design and analyses.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
We searched MEDLINE for health equity-relevant observational studies from January 2020 to March 2022, resulting in 16 828 articles. We randomly selected 320 studies, ensuring a balance in focus on populations experiencing inequities, country income settings, and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) topic. We extracted information on study design and analysis methods.
Results
UNASSIGNED
The bulk of the studies were conducted in North America (n = 95, 30%), followed by Europe and Central Asia (n = 55, 17%). Half of the studies (n = 171, 53%) addressed general health and well-being, while 49 (15%) focused on mental health conditions. Two-thirds of the studies (n = 220, 69%) were cross-sectional. Eight (3%) engaged with populations experiencing inequities, while 22 (29%) adapted recruitment methods to reach these populations. Further, 67 studies (21%) examined interaction effects primarily related to race or ethnicity (48%). Two-thirds of the studies (72%) adjusted for characteristics associated with inequities, and 18 studies (6%) used flow diagrams to depict how populations experiencing inequities progressed throughout the studies.
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
Despite over 80% of the equity-focused observational studies providing a rationale for a focus on health equity, reporting of study design features relevant to health equity ranged from 0-95%, with over half of the items reported by less than one-quarter of studies. This methodological study is a baseline assessment to inform the development of an equity-focussed reporting guideline for observational studies as an extension of the well-known Strengthening Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guideline.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38491911
doi: 10.7189/jogh.14.04046
pmc: PMC10903926
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
04046Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 by the Journal of Global Health. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Disclosure of interest: The authors completed the ICMJE Disclosure of Interest Form (available upon request from the corresponding author) and declare the following activities and relationships: LGC is employed by the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO/WHO). The ideas expressed in this manuscript are the authors’ own and do not necessarily reflect the decisions and policies of PAHO/WHO. The remaining authors have no conflicts to declare.
Références
PLoS Med. 2012;9(10):e1001333
pubmed: 23222917
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Dec;128:35-48
pubmed: 32526461
Implement Sci. 2021 Mar 19;16(1):28
pubmed: 33740999
J Comp Eff Res. 2019 Nov;8(15):1327-1341
pubmed: 31736341
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Oct 12;18(1):106
pubmed: 30314471
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Apr;37(Suppl 1):105-108
pubmed: 35349021
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Nov 11;5:33
pubmed: 31720008
Du Bois Rev. 2011 Apr;8(1):115-132
pubmed: 25632292
BMJ. 2017 Nov 23;359:j5085
pubmed: 29170161
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Mar 30;22(1):55
pubmed: 36991403
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;90:59-67
pubmed: 28412464
BMJ. 2014 Jun 25;348:g3804
pubmed: 24965222
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Oct 21;5:30
pubmed: 31646001
Epidemiology. 2018 Jan;29(1):5-7
pubmed: 29053554
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Nov 14;18(1):174
pubmed: 31727076
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Feb 19;18(1):36
pubmed: 30782161
Health Promot Pract. 2021 Nov;22(6):741-746
pubmed: 32814445
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Feb;9(1):420-427
pubmed: 34821083
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2019 Dec 2;5(4):e14886
pubmed: 31789598
Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 29;1:60
pubmed: 23194585
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Feb 15;15(1):11
pubmed: 28202078
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 06;5(4):
pubmed: 33172059
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Dec;116:26-35
pubmed: 31398440
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018 Sep 27;11:495-510
pubmed: 30310289
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Apr 28;9(1):27
pubmed: 37118762
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2023 Feb;58(2):183-191
pubmed: 36149450
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71
pubmed: 33782057
BMJ. 2007 Oct 20;335(7624):806-8
pubmed: 17947786
CMAJ Open. 2023 Sep 19;11(5):E826-E837
pubmed: 37726115
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;75:40-6
pubmed: 27005575
JAMA. 2021 Apr 13;325(14):1464-1465
pubmed: 33616617
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jan;67(1):56-64
pubmed: 24189091
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;107:42-50
pubmed: 30423373
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 25;7(9):e015815
pubmed: 28951402
Clin Nurs Res. 2020 Sep;29(7):440-447
pubmed: 29932007
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Feb;32(2):117-25
pubmed: 25387297
BMJ. 2017 Aug 2;358:j3453
pubmed: 28768629
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 04;18(17):
pubmed: 34501949
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 18;1:MR000028
pubmed: 35040487
Value Health. 2017 Mar;20(3):481-486
pubmed: 28292494
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 19;16(4):
pubmed: 30791452
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jul 11;16(1):60
pubmed: 29996848
Int J Health Serv. 1992;22(3):429-45
pubmed: 1644507
Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2021 Feb 1;35(1):24-49
pubmed: 33632921
Lancet. 2018 Jan 20;391(10117):241-250
pubmed: 29137869