Thumb Pronation Angle in Thumb Opposition Evaluated by the Nail Tip Angle of Thumb-Ring Finger Opposition.

Kapandji score evaluation nail tip angle research and health outcomes thumb opposition thumb pronation

Journal

Hand (New York, N.Y.)
ISSN: 1558-9455
Titre abrégé: Hand (N Y)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101264149

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Mar 2024
Historique:
medline: 16 3 2024
pubmed: 16 3 2024
entrez: 16 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

This study aimed to devise the method for the evaluation of the thumb pronation angle and calculate its reference value. The study was conducted from October 2021 to March 2022, and 600 hands of 300 healthy volunteers were included in this study. The participants were divided into 6 age groups with 50 participants each. In study 1, 12 participants from group 1 were randomly selected, which included 6 male and 6 female participants. We measured the thumb pronation angle using FASTRAK system and the nail tip angle of thumb-ring finger opposition (T-R angle) and also evaluated the relation between them. In study 2, we measured the T-R angle of 600 hands of 300 healthy volunteers. The T-R angle mean (SD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of each age group were calculated as reference values. The thumb pronation angle was correlated with the T-R angle. The T-R angle mean (SD) and 95% CI of the 6 groups were as follows: group 1, 142.5° (12.4) and 117.7 to 167.3; group 2, 139.9° (10.1) and 119.7 to 160.1; group 3, 142.3° (9.7) and 122.9 to 160.5; group 4, 140.2° (12.6) and 115.0 to 165.4; group 5, 138.3° (11.9) and 114.5 to 162.1; and group 6, 135.4° (13.0) and 109.4 to 161.4. The 95% CI tended to decrease with an increasing age. The T-R angle was a suitable evaluation method for the thumb pronation angle, and it should be evaluated by age groups.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND UNASSIGNED
This study aimed to devise the method for the evaluation of the thumb pronation angle and calculate its reference value.
METHODS UNASSIGNED
The study was conducted from October 2021 to March 2022, and 600 hands of 300 healthy volunteers were included in this study. The participants were divided into 6 age groups with 50 participants each. In study 1, 12 participants from group 1 were randomly selected, which included 6 male and 6 female participants. We measured the thumb pronation angle using FASTRAK system and the nail tip angle of thumb-ring finger opposition (T-R angle) and also evaluated the relation between them. In study 2, we measured the T-R angle of 600 hands of 300 healthy volunteers. The T-R angle mean (SD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of each age group were calculated as reference values.
RESULTS UNASSIGNED
The thumb pronation angle was correlated with the T-R angle. The T-R angle mean (SD) and 95% CI of the 6 groups were as follows: group 1, 142.5° (12.4) and 117.7 to 167.3; group 2, 139.9° (10.1) and 119.7 to 160.1; group 3, 142.3° (9.7) and 122.9 to 160.5; group 4, 140.2° (12.6) and 115.0 to 165.4; group 5, 138.3° (11.9) and 114.5 to 162.1; and group 6, 135.4° (13.0) and 109.4 to 161.4. The 95% CI tended to decrease with an increasing age.
CONCLUSIONS UNASSIGNED
The T-R angle was a suitable evaluation method for the thumb pronation angle, and it should be evaluated by age groups.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38491921
doi: 10.1177/15589447241236249
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

15589447241236249

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Shinji Taniguchi (S)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toho University School of Medicine, Sakura, Japan.

Yusuke Matsuura (Y)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Japan.

Tatsuya Takehara (T)

Department of Rehabilitation, Chiba University Hospital, Japan.

Ayae Yamada (A)

Department of Rehabilitation, Chiba University Hospital, Japan.

Yuki Shiko (Y)

Clinical Research Center, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Japan.

Koichi Nakagawa (K)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toho University School of Medicine, Sakura, Japan.

Seiji Ohtori (S)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Japan.

Classifications MeSH