How different face mask types affect interpersonal distance perception and threat feeling in social interaction.

Age groups Comfort distance Proximity Psychological perception Virtual reality

Journal

Cognitive processing

ISSN: 1612-4790

Titre abrégé: Cogn Process

Pays: Germany

ID NLM: 101177984

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Mar 2024

Historique:

received: 25 04 2023

accepted: 05 02 2024

medline: 16 3 2024

pubmed: 16 3 2024

entrez: 16 3 2024

Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Due to the easing of the pandemic, public policies no longer mandated people to wear masks. People can choose to no wear or wear different types of masks based on personal preferences and safety perceptions during daily interaction. Available information about the influence of face mask type on interpersonal distance (IPD) by different aging populations is still lacking. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the face mask type (no wear, cloth, medical and N95 mask) and age group effect of avatars (children, adults and older adults) on IPD perception, threat feeling and physiological skin conductance response under active and passive approaching. One hundred participants with a range from 20 to 35 years old were recruited for this study. Twelve avatars (three age groups*four face mask conditions) were created and applied in a virtual reality environment. The results showed that age group, mask type and approach mode had significant effects on IPD and subjective threat feeling. A non-significant effect was found on skin conductance responses. Participants maintained a significantly longer IPD when facing the older adults, followed by adults and then children. In the passive approach condition, people tended to maintain a significantly greater comfort distance than during the active approach. For the mask type effect, people kept a significantly largest and shortest IPD when facing an avatar with no mask or the N95 mask, respectively. A non-significant IPD difference was found between the N95 and medical mask. Additionally, based on the subjective threat feeling, facing an avatar wearing a medical mask generated the lowest threat feeling compared to the others. The findings of this study indicated that wearing medical masks provided a benefit in bringing people closer for interaction during specific situations. Understanding that mask-wearing, especially medical one, brought to shortest IPD when compared to the unmasked condition can be utilized to enhance safety measures in crowded public spaces and health-care settings. This information could guide the development of physical distancing recommendations, taking into account both the type of mask and the age groups involved, to ensure the maintenance of appropriate distances.

Identifiants

DOI: 10.1007/s10339-024-01179-z PMID: 38492094

pubmed: 38492094

doi: 10.1007/s10339-024-01179-z

pii: 10.1007/s10339-024-01179-z

doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

Subventions

Organisme : National Science and Technology Council

ID : 112-2222-E-027-003-MY3

Informations de copyright

Références

Abney K (2018) “Containing” tuberculosis, perpetuating stigma: the materiality of N95 respirator masks. Anthropol South Afr 41(4):270–283

Adams L, Zuckerman D (1991) The effect of lighting conditions on personal space requirements. J Gen Psychol 118(4):335–340

doi: 10.1080/00221309.1991.9917794

Aliakbari M, Faraji E, Pourshakibaee P (2011) Investigation of the proxemic behavior of Iranian professors and university students: effects of gender and status. J Pragmat 43:1392–1402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.021

doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.021

Bailenson JN, Blascovich J, Beall AC, Loomis JM (2003) Interpersonal distance in immersive virtual environments. Pers Soc Psycho Bull 29(7):819–833

doi: 10.1177/0146167203029007002

Balas B, Tupa L, Pacella J (2018) Measuring social variables in real and artificial faces. Comput Human Behav 88:236–243

doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.013

Becchio C, Sartori L, Bulgheroni M, Castiello U (2008) Both your intention and mine are reflected in the kinematics of my reach-to-grasp movement. Cognition 106(2):894–912

doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.004 pubmed: 17585893

Calbi M, Langiulli N, Ferroni F et al (2021) The consequences of COVID-19 on social interactions: an online study on face covering. Sci Rep 11:2601. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81780-w

doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81780-w pubmed: 33510195 pmcid: 7844002

Candini M, Battaglia S, Benassi M, Pellegrino G, Frassinetti F (2021) The physiological correlates of interpersonal space. Sci Rep 11(1):1–8

doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82223-2

Cañigueral R, Hamilton AFC (2019) The role of eye gaze during natural social interactions in typical and autistic people. Front Psychol 10:560. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00560

doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00560 pubmed: 30930822 pmcid: 6428744

Caria A, Falco S, Venuti P, Lee S, Esposito G, Rigo P et al (2012) Species-specific response to human infant faces in the premotor cortex. Neuroimage 60(2):884–893

doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.068 pubmed: 22230948

Cartaud A, Ruggiero G, Ott L, Iachini T, Coello Y (2018) Physiological response to facial expressions in peripersonal space determines interpersonal distance in a social interaction context. Front Psychol 9:657

doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00657 pubmed: 29867639 pmcid: 5949865

Cartaud A, Quesque F, Coello Y (2020) Wearing a face mask against Covid-19 results in a reduction of social distancing. PLoS ONE 15(12):e0243023

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243023 pubmed: 33284812 pmcid: 7721169

Chen YL, Rahman A (2023) Effects of target variables on interpersonal distance perception for young Taiwanese during the COVID-19 pandemic. Healthcare 11:1711. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11121711

doi: 10.3390/healthcare11121711 pubmed: 37372829 pmcid: 10298364

Chen YL, Lee YC, Rahman A (2024) Perceived interpersonal distances: a cross-cultural analysis of young Taiwanese and young southeast Asians during the COVID-19 pandemic. Behav Sci 14(1):20. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14010020

doi: 10.3390/bs14010020

Chu DK, Akl EA, Duda S, Solo K, Yaacoub S, Schünemann HJ et al (2020) Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 395(10242):1973–1987

doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31142-9 pubmed: 32497510 pmcid: 7263814

Coello Y, Cartaud A (2021) The interrelation between peripersonalaction space and interpersonal social space: psychophysiological evidence and clinical implications. Front Hum Neurosci 15:636124. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.636124

doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.636124 pubmed: 33732124 pmcid: 7959827

Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A (2007) G* power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39:175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146

doi: 10.3758/BF03193146 pubmed: 17695343

Feng S, Shen C, Xia N, Song W, Fan M, Cowling BJ (2020) Rational use of face masks in the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Respir Med 8(5):434–436

doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30134-X pubmed: 32203710 pmcid: 7118603

Foo CCI, Goon ATJ, Leow YH, Goh CL (2006) Adverse skin reactions to personal protective equipment against severe acute respiratory syndrome—a descriptive study in Singapore. Contact Dermat 55(5):291–294

doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2006.00953.x

Ganel T, Goodale M (2022) Smiling makes you look older, even when you wear a mask: the effect of face masks on age perception. Cogn Res Princ Implic. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-022-00432-3

doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00432-3 pubmed: 36068390 pmcid: 9448834

Geers L, Coello Y (2022) The influence of face mask on social spaces depends on the behavioral immune system. Front Neurosci 16:991578. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.991578

doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.991578 pubmed: 36440271 pmcid: 9691846

Hall ET (1966) The hidden dimension, vol xii. Doubleday & Co, New York

Hecht H, Welsch R, Viehoff J, Longo MR (2019) The shape of personal space. Acta Psychol 193:113–122

doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.12.009

Hessels RS (2020) How does gaze to faces support face-to-face interaction? A review and perspective. Psychon Bull Rev 27(5):856–881. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01715-w

doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01715-w pubmed: 32367351 pmcid: 7547045

Hu H, Li Z, Yan J, Wang X, Xiao H, Duan J, Zheng L (2007) Anthropometric measurement of the Chinese elderly living in the Beijing area. Int J Ind Ergon 37(4):303–311

doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2006.11.006

Hua W, Zuo Y, Wan R, Xiong L, Tnag J, Zou L, Li L (2020) Short-term skin reactions following use of N95 respirators and medical masks. Contact Dermat. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13601

doi: 10.1111/cod.13601

Iachini T, Coello Y, Frassinetti F, Ruggiero G (2014) Body space in social interactions: a comparison of reaching and comfort distance in immersive virtual reality. PLoS ONE 9(11):e111511

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111511 pubmed: 25405344 pmcid: 4236010

Iachini T, Pagliaro S, Ruggiero G (2015) Near or far? It depends on my impression: moral information and spatial behavior in virtual interactions. Acta Psychol 161:131–136

doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.09.003

Iachini T, Coello Y, Frassinetti F, Senese VP, Galante F, Ruggiero G (2016) Peripersonal and interpersonal space in virtual and real environments: effects of gender and age. J Environ Psychol 45:154–164

doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.01.004

Kim MN (2020) What type of face mask Is appropriate for everyone-mask-wearing policy amidst COVID-19 pandemic? J Korean Med Sci 35(20):e186

doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e186 pubmed: 32449327 pmcid: 7246185

Kroczek LOH, Böehme S, Mühlberger A (2022) Face masks reduce interpersonal distance in virtual reality. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06086-x

doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06086-x pubmed: 35365678 pmcid: 8976084

Kühne K, Fischer MH, Jeglinski-Mende MA (2022) During the COVID-19 pandemic participants prefer settings with a face mask, no interaction and at a closer distance. Sci Rep 12:12777. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16730-1

doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16730-1 pubmed: 35896701 pmcid: 9326138

Layden EA, Cacioppo JT, Cacioppo S (2018) Loneliness predicts a preference for larger interpersonal distance within intimate space. PLoS ONE 13(9):e0203491

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203491 pubmed: 30188950 pmcid: 6126853

Lee YC, Chen YL (2021) Influence of wearing surgical mask on interpersonal space perception between Mainland Chinese and Taiwanese people. Front Psychol 12:692404. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.692404

doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.692404 pubmed: 34539490 pmcid: 8446185

Lee YC, Yu X, Xiong W (2022) A comparative evaluation of the four measurement methods for comfort and reachability distance perceptions. Behav Res Methods 54:1766–1777. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01715-1

doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01715-1 pubmed: 34664228

Li Y, Wong T, Chung AJ, Guo YP, Hu JY, Guan YT et al (2006) In vivo protective performance of N95 respirator and surgical facemask. Am J Ind Med 49(12):1056–1065

doi: 10.1002/ajim.20395 pubmed: 17096360

Lu JG, Jin P, English AS (2021) Collectivism predicts mask use during COVID-19. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 118(23):e2021793118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2021793118)

doi: 10.1073/pnas.2021793118) pubmed: 34016707 pmcid: 8201834

Luckman A, Zeitoun H, Isoni A, Loomes G, Vlaev I, Powdthavee N, Read D (2021) Risk compensation during COVID-19: The impact of face mask usage on social distancing. J Exp Psychol Appl 27(4):722–738. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000382

doi: 10.1037/xap0000382 pubmed: 35073133

MacIntyre CR, Seale H, Dung TC, Hien NT, Nga PT, Chughtai AA et al (2015) A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers. BMJ Open 5(4):e006577

doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006577 pubmed: 25903751 pmcid: 4420971

Matteo PL, Marina S, Martina F, Salvatore MA (2021) A Bayesian approach to reveal the key role of mask wearing in modulating projected interpersonal distance during the first COVID-19 outbreak. PLoS ONE 16(8):e0255598. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255598

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255598

Mills JS, Musto S, Williams L, Tiggemann M (2018) “Selfie” harm: effects on mood and body image in young women. Body Image 27:86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.08.007

doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.08.007 pubmed: 30149282

Mueller AV, Fernandez LA (2020) Assessment of fabric masks as alternatives to standard surgical masks in terms of particle filtration efficiency. medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.17.20069567

doi: 10.1101/2020.04.17.20069567 pubmed: 32935118 pmcid: 7491533

Muthiah A, Lee YC (2022) Comparative analysis of male cyclist population in four Asia countries for anthropometric measurements. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19:10078. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610078

doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610078 pubmed: 36011711 pmcid: 9408745

Ohyama S, Nishiike S, Watanabe H, Matsuoka K, Akizuki H, Takeda N, Harada T (2007) Autonomic responses during motion sickness induced by virtual reality. Auris Nasus Larynx 34(3):303–306

doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2007.01.002 pubmed: 17336009

Ramdani C, Ogier M, Coutrot A (2022) Communicating and reading emotion with masked faces in the Covid era: a short review of the literature. Psychiatry Res 316:114755

doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114755 pubmed: 35963061 pmcid: 9338224

Ruggiero G, Frassinetti F, Coello Y, Rapuano M, Di Cola AS, Iachini T (2017) The effect of facial expressions on peripersonal and interpersonal spaces. Psychol Res 81:1232–1240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0806-x

doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0806-x pubmed: 27785567

Ruggiero G, Rapuano M, Iachini T (2019) Perceived temperature modulates peripersonal and interpersonal spaces differently in men and Women. J Environ Psychol 63:52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.04.004

doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.04.004

Ruggiero G, Rapuano M, Cartaud A et al (2021) Defensive functions provoke similar psychophysiological reactions in reaching and comfort spaces. Sci Rep 11:5170. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83988-2

doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83988-2 pubmed: 33664292 pmcid: 7933359

Scerrati E, D’Ascenzo S, Nicoletti R, Villani C, Lugli L (2022) Assessing interpersonal proximity evaluation in the COVID-19 era: evidence from the affective priming task. Front Psychol 13:901730. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.901730

doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.901730 pubmed: 35783734 pmcid: 9243638

Shakya KM, Noyes A, Kallin R, Peltier RE (2017) Evaluating the efficacy of cloth facemasks in reducing particulate matter exposure. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 27(3):352–357

doi: 10.1038/jes.2016.42 pubmed: 27531371

Sicorello M, Stevanov J, Ashida H, Hecht H (2019a) Effect of gaze on personal space: a Japanese–German cross-cultural study. J Cross Cult Psychol 50(1):8–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022118798513

doi: 10.1177/0022022118798513

Sicorello M, Stevanov J, Ashida H, Hecht H (2019b) Effect of gaze on personal space: a Japanese–German cross-cultural study. J Cross Cult Psychol 50:8–21

doi: 10.1177/0022022118798513

Sorokowska A, Sorokowski P, Hilpert P, Cantarero K, Frackowiak T, Ahmadi K et al (2017) Preferred interpersonal distances: a global comparison. J Cross Cult Psychol 48:577–592

doi: 10.1177/0022022117698039

Szepietowski JC, Matusiak L, Szepietowska M, Krajewski PK, Białynicki-Birula R (2020) Face mask-induced itch: a self-questionnaire study of 2,315 responders during the COVID-19 pandemic. Acta Derm Venereol 100(5):5789

pubmed: 32449781 pmcid: 9137368

Tajadura-Jiménez A, Pantelidou G, Rebacz P, Västfjäll D, Tsakiris M (2012) I-Space: the effects of emotional valence and source of music on interpersonal distance. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/annotation/6a8a7614-6c5d-4d43-ba98-3259c1271493

doi: 10.1371/annotation/6a8a7614-6c5d-4d43-ba98-3259c1271493 pubmed: 22866177 pmcid: 3552741

Thomas L, von Castell C, Hecht H (2022) How facial masks alter the interaction of gaze direction, head orientation, and emotion recognition. Front Neurosci 16:937939. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.937939

doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.937939 pubmed: 36213742 pmcid: 9533556

Tseng CH, Wang CT, Hsu CH, Liu JW (2022) Behavioral intention to use distance teaching in the pandemic era. Front Psychol 13:879316. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.879316

doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.879316 pubmed: 36033085 pmcid: 9404522

Van Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris DH, Holbrook MG, Gamble A, Williamson BN et al (2020) Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. N Engl J Med 382(16):1564–1567

doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2004973 pubmed: 32182409

Ventura M, Palmisano A, Innamorato F, Tedesco G, Manippa V, Caffò AO, Rivolta D (2022) Face memory and facial expression recognition are both affected by wearing disposable surgical face masks. Cogn Process. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-022-01112-2

doi: 10.1007/s10339-022-01112-2 pubmed: 36242672 pmcid: 9568966

Wang Z, Ma J, Dong B, Song Y, Hu PJ, Zhang B (2012) Comparison of blood pressure levels among four age groups of Chinese children matched by height. J Hum Hypertens 26(7):437–442

doi: 10.1038/jhh.2011.45 pubmed: 21562579

Worby CJ, Chang HH (2020) Face mask use in the general population and optimal resource allocation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nat Commun 11(1):1–9

doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17922-x

Workman JE (1987) Fashionable versus out-of-date clothing and interpersonal distance. Cloth Text Res J 5(3):31–35

doi: 10.1177/0887302X8700500305

Yu XQ, Xiong W, Lee YC (2020) An investigation into interpersonal and peripersonal spaces of Chinese people for different directions and genders. Front Psychol 11:981

doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00981 pubmed: 32581912 pmcid: 7290242

Yu X, Chen CH, Xia Z, Wang C, Xiong W (2023) Interpersonal distance perception during the normalization of an pandemic situation: effects of mask-wearing and vaccination. PsyCh J. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.719

doi: 10.1002/pchj.719 pubmed: 38105590

Zebrowitz LA, Rhodes G (2004) Sensitivity to “bad genes” and the anomalous face overgeneralization effect: cue validity, cue utilization, and accuracy in judging intelligence and health. J Nonverbal Behav 28(3):167–185. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JONB.0000039648.30935.1b

doi: 10.1023/B:JONB.0000039648.30935.1b