Evaluation of two commercial broth microdilution systems for dalbavancin susceptibility testing of MRSA and other resistant Gram-positive cocci.
Linezolid-resistant staphylococci
Lipoglycopeptide
MR staphylococci
MRSA
VRE
Journal
Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
ISSN: 1469-0691
Titre abrégé: Clin Microbiol Infect
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9516420
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Mar 2024
14 Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
27
11
2023
revised:
24
02
2024
accepted:
09
03
2024
medline:
17
3
2024
pubmed:
17
3
2024
entrez:
16
3
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
This study aims to evaluate two commercial broth microdilution (BMD) systems, E1-185-100 (Merlin) and FDANDPF (ThermoFisher) for dalbavancin susceptibility testing in comparison with reference broth microdilution assay. Study collection was composed of 200 nonreplicate multidrug-resistant Gram-positive cocci of clinical origin, including 180 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 10 vancomycin resistant enterococci, 7 linezolid resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis, and 3 methicillin-resistant coagulase negative staphylococci. S. aureus ATCC 29213 and Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 reference strains were also included as controls. Testing was performed according to the ISO 20776-1 standard, starting from the same bacterial inoculum, and results were compared according to the ISO 20776-2 standard. Reference BMD showed that 92.6% (187/202) of the strains were susceptible to dalbavancin, while few staphylococci and all VanA-producing enterococci showed a resistant phenotype. In comparison with the reference method, Category Agreement and Essential Agreement of 98% (198/202; 95% CI, 95.4%-99.3%) and 98% (198/202; 95% CI, 95.4-99.3%), for both Merlin and ThermoFisher panels. A few false susceptibilities were observed, for both commercial systems, with dalbavancin-resistant staphylococci. BIAS values of 11% and 3% were calculated for the Merlin and ThermoFisher systems, respectively. This study, reporting the first evaluation of the two commercially available BMD assays for dalbavancin susceptibility testing, revealed an overall good correlation with reference BMD, although with some underestimation tendency of MIC values by both commercial systems. Further studies involving a higher number of resistant isolates will be necessary to better evaluate this issue.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38492739
pii: S1198-743X(24)00141-1
doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2024.03.013
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest GMR reports grants from Angelini, Ada, Alifax, Arrow, Biomedical Service, bioMérieux, Cepheid, Diesse Diagnostica Senese, Menarini, Meridian, MSD, Nordic Pharma, Qlinea, Qiagen, Quantamatrix, Quidel, Qvella, Relab SD, Biosensor, Shionogi, Symcel; Consulting fees from bioMérieux, MSD, Viatris, Advanz Pharma; Speakers bureaus for bioMérieux, Menarini, MSD, Pfizer, Shionogi, Relab. TG reports grants from Arrow, Coris, Merlin, Venatorx; Consulting fees for bioMérieux, Menarini, Thermofisher. AA reports consulting fees from Menarini; Speakers bureaus for Angelini, Menarini, Seegene, Ada, SD Biosensor, Qvella.