A blood-based multi-biomarker approach reveals different physiological responses of common kestrels to contrasting environments.

Biomarkers Common kestrels Falconiformes Oxidative status Physiological responses Urbanization

Journal

Environmental research
ISSN: 1096-0953
Titre abrégé: Environ Res
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0147621

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 09 01 2024
revised: 06 03 2024
accepted: 09 03 2024
medline: 17 3 2024
pubmed: 17 3 2024
entrez: 16 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The increase of urbanization and agricultural activities is causing a dramatic reduction of natural environments. As a consequence, animals need to physiologically adjust to these novel environments, in order to exploit them for foraging and breeding. The aim of this work was to compare the physiological status among nestling common kestrels Falco tinnunculus that were raised in nest-boxes located in more natural, rural, or urban areas in a landscape with a mosaic of land uses around Rome in Central Italy. A blood-based multi-biomarker approach was applied to evaluate physiological responses at multiple levels, including antioxidant concentrations, immunological functions, genotoxicity, and neurotoxicity. We found lower concentrations of glutathione and GSH:GSSG ratio values and higher proportions of monocytes in urban birds compared to the other areas. We also found higher DNA damage and inhibition of butyrylcholinesterase activity in rural birds compared to urban and natural areas. Finally, we found similar values among study areas for respiratory burst, complement system, bactericidal capacity, and plasma non-enzymatic antioxidant capacity. These results suggest that (i) city life does not necessarily cause physiological alterations in kestrels compared to life in other habitats, and (ii) environmental pressures are likely to differ in typology and intensity across habitats requiring specific responses that a multi-biomarker approach can help to detect. Further studies are needed to assess which factors are responsible for the physiological differences among city, rural, and natural birds, and whether these differences are consistent across time and space.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38492836
pii: S0013-9351(24)00578-4
doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.118674
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

118674

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Laura Giovanetti (L)

Department of Physical, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Siena, 53100, Siena, Italy. Electronic address: laura.giovanetti@unisi.it.

Ilaria Caliani (I)

Department of Physical, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Siena, 53100, Siena, Italy. Electronic address: caliani4@unisi.it.

Gianluca Damiani (G)

Ornis Italica, Piazza Crati 15, 00199, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: gianlucadamianiph@gmail.com.

Giacomo Dell'Omo (G)

Ornis Italica, Piazza Crati 15, 00199, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: giacomo.dellomo@omail.com.

David Costantini (D)

Department of Ecological and Biological Sciences, University of Tuscia, Largo Dell'Università s.n.c., 01100, Viterbo, Italy; Unité Physiologie Moléculaire et Adaptation, UMR7221 CNRS-Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 75005, Paris, France. Electronic address: david.costantini@unitus.it.

Silvia Casini (S)

Department of Physical, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Siena, 53100, Siena, Italy. Electronic address: silvia.casini@unisi.it.

Classifications MeSH