Review of the standards of proof (of safety) for FDA regulated consumer products and how the generally recognized as safe criteria could be applied to cosmetics.
Journal
Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP
ISSN: 1096-0295
Titre abrégé: Regul Toxicol Pharmacol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8214983
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Mar 2024
15 Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
30
08
2023
revised:
06
03
2024
accepted:
12
03
2024
medline:
18
3
2024
pubmed:
18
3
2024
entrez:
17
3
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act of 2022 (MoCRA) amends the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), elevating the standard of proof of safety (better known as a "safety standard") for cosmetics to the standard of a "reasonable certainty … [of] … safe."a standard equal to that of food ingredients. The standards of the proof of safety differ for various classes of FDA-regulated product categories (e.g., cosmetics, dietary supplements, food ingredients and food itself). This manuscript describes the various standards of proof, the essential differences between the standards, key elements required to achieve a particular standard and compares the standards to more familiar legal terms such as "a preponderance of the evidence" or "beyond reasonable doubt." The standards of proof for these product categories are also ranked according to increasing threshold for achievement of "safe" status. Lastly, this manuscript suggests how the requirements for the high standard of a "reasonable certainty of safe" (or "reasonable certainty of no harm") might be met.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38494042
pii: S0273-2300(24)00044-8
doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105603
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
105603Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.