Review of the standards of proof (of safety) for FDA regulated consumer products and how the generally recognized as safe criteria could be applied to cosmetics.


Journal

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP
ISSN: 1096-0295
Titre abrégé: Regul Toxicol Pharmacol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8214983

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 30 08 2023
revised: 06 03 2024
accepted: 12 03 2024
medline: 18 3 2024
pubmed: 18 3 2024
entrez: 17 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act of 2022 (MoCRA) amends the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), elevating the standard of proof of safety (better known as a "safety standard") for cosmetics to the standard of a "reasonable certainty … [of] … safe."a standard equal to that of food ingredients. The standards of the proof of safety differ for various classes of FDA-regulated product categories (e.g., cosmetics, dietary supplements, food ingredients and food itself). This manuscript describes the various standards of proof, the essential differences between the standards, key elements required to achieve a particular standard and compares the standards to more familiar legal terms such as "a preponderance of the evidence" or "beyond reasonable doubt." The standards of proof for these product categories are also ranked according to increasing threshold for achievement of "safe" status. Lastly, this manuscript suggests how the requirements for the high standard of a "reasonable certainty of safe" (or "reasonable certainty of no harm") might be met.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38494042
pii: S0273-2300(24)00044-8
doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105603
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

105603

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

George A Burdock (GA)

Burdock Group Consultants, Orlando, FL, 32814, USA. Electronic address: gburdock@burdockgroup.com.

Classifications MeSH