Population pharmacokinetics of prophylactic cefoxitin in elective bariatric surgery patients: A prospective monocentric study.

bariatric surgery cefoxitin continuous infusion. obesity pharmacokinetics surgical prophylaxis

Journal

Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine
ISSN: 2352-5568
Titre abrégé: Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101652401

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 24 10 2023
revised: 19 02 2024
accepted: 12 03 2024
medline: 18 3 2024
pubmed: 18 3 2024
entrez: 17 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

This study describes the population pharmacokinetics of cefoxitin in obese patients undergoing elective bariatric surgery and evaluates different dosing regimens for achievement of pre-defined target exposures. Serial blood samples were collected during surgery with relevant clinical data. Total serum cefoxitin concentrations were measured by chromatographic assay and analysed using a population PK approach with Pmetrics®. The cefoxitin unbound fraction (fu) was estimated. Dosing simulations were performed to ascertain the probability of target attainment (PTA) to achieve cefoxitin fu above minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) from surgical incision to wound closure. Fractional target attainment (FTA) was calculated against MIC distributions of common pathogens. A total of 123 obese patients (median BMI 44.3 kg/m Intermittent dosing regimens resulted in optimal FTAs against susceptible MIC distributions of S. aureus and E. coli when simulating with 50% cefoxitin protein binding. Continuous infusion of cefoxitin may improve FTA regardless of protein binding. Registration on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03306290.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
This study describes the population pharmacokinetics of cefoxitin in obese patients undergoing elective bariatric surgery and evaluates different dosing regimens for achievement of pre-defined target exposures.
METHODS METHODS
Serial blood samples were collected during surgery with relevant clinical data. Total serum cefoxitin concentrations were measured by chromatographic assay and analysed using a population PK approach with Pmetrics®. The cefoxitin unbound fraction (fu) was estimated. Dosing simulations were performed to ascertain the probability of target attainment (PTA) to achieve cefoxitin fu above minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) from surgical incision to wound closure. Fractional target attainment (FTA) was calculated against MIC distributions of common pathogens.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 123 obese patients (median BMI 44.3 kg/m
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Intermittent dosing regimens resulted in optimal FTAs against susceptible MIC distributions of S. aureus and E. coli when simulating with 50% cefoxitin protein binding. Continuous infusion of cefoxitin may improve FTA regardless of protein binding.
STUDY REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
Registration on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03306290.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38494157
pii: S2352-5568(24)00034-1
doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101376
pii:
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03306290']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

101376

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Auteurs

Emmanuel Novy (E)

Department of Anaesthesiology Critical Care and perioperative medicine, Nancy University Hospital, University of Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, 54500, France; UR 7300, SIMPA, Université de Lorraine, 54000, Nancy, France; UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4029, Australia. Electronic address: e.novy@chru-nancy.fr.

Xin Liu (X)

UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4029, Australia.

Maria Patricia Hernandez-Mitre (MP)

UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4029, Australia.

Thibaut Belveyre (T)

Department of Anaesthesiology Critical Care and perioperative medicine, Nancy University Hospital, University of Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, 54500, France.

Julien Scala-Bertola (J)

Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Nancy University Hospital, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, 54500, France; CNRS, IMoPA, Université de Lorraine, 54000, Nancy, France.

Jason A Roberts (J)

UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4029, Australia; Division of Anaesthesiology Critical Care Emergency & Pain Medicine, Nîmes University Hospital, University of Montpellier, Nîmes, 30029, France; Herston Infectious Disease Institute (HeiDI), Metro North Health, Brisbane, Australia.

Suzanne L Parker (S)

UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4029, Australia.

Classifications MeSH