Predictors of adherence in Austrian employees during the COVID-19 pandemic: results of an online survey.

COVID-19 adherence barriers to health-promoting measures corona fatigue employees health belief model online-survey social norms

Journal

Frontiers in public health
ISSN: 2296-2565
Titre abrégé: Front Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101616579

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 01 12 2023
accepted: 22 02 2024
medline: 18 3 2024
pubmed: 18 3 2024
entrez: 18 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Since the beginning of the pandemic in December 2019, Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been a significant challenge to health care systems throughout the world. The introduction of measures to reduce the incidence of infection had a significant impact on the workplace. Overall, companies played a key and adaptive role in coping with the pandemic. Cross-sectional data from an online-survey of 1,183 employees conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic in spring 2021 in Austria were used in the analyses. The influence of health beliefs (e.g., perceived severity), modifying factors (e.g., age) and time-dependent factors (e.g., corona fatigue) on individual adherence were evaluated. The conception of the questionnaire was based on the health belief model. The majority of respondents were female (58.3%), worked in companies with more than 250 employees (56.6%) and had been to an academic secondary school or had a university degree (58.3%). Overall, employees were adherent to most of the measures at their company (>80%), except for wearing FFP-2 masks when they were travelling in a car with coworkers (59.3, 95%CI 51.3-66.7%). Overall adherence was associated with high ratings for the meaningfulness of testing (OR: 2.06 95%CI: 1.00-4.22; The importance attached to testing and social norms, as well as lower perceived barriers to health-promoting measures and low levels of corona fatigue all increase overall adherence to Covid-19 protective measures in companies. Strategies to improve adherence should be adapted depending on the aim (to raise overall adherence or adherence to individual measures) and on the group of persons that is being targeted.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Since the beginning of the pandemic in December 2019, Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been a significant challenge to health care systems throughout the world. The introduction of measures to reduce the incidence of infection had a significant impact on the workplace. Overall, companies played a key and adaptive role in coping with the pandemic.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Cross-sectional data from an online-survey of 1,183 employees conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic in spring 2021 in Austria were used in the analyses. The influence of health beliefs (e.g., perceived severity), modifying factors (e.g., age) and time-dependent factors (e.g., corona fatigue) on individual adherence were evaluated. The conception of the questionnaire was based on the health belief model.
Results UNASSIGNED
The majority of respondents were female (58.3%), worked in companies with more than 250 employees (56.6%) and had been to an academic secondary school or had a university degree (58.3%). Overall, employees were adherent to most of the measures at their company (>80%), except for wearing FFP-2 masks when they were travelling in a car with coworkers (59.3, 95%CI 51.3-66.7%). Overall adherence was associated with high ratings for the meaningfulness of testing (OR: 2.06 95%CI: 1.00-4.22;
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
The importance attached to testing and social norms, as well as lower perceived barriers to health-promoting measures and low levels of corona fatigue all increase overall adherence to Covid-19 protective measures in companies. Strategies to improve adherence should be adapted depending on the aim (to raise overall adherence or adherence to individual measures) and on the group of persons that is being targeted.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38496390
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1347818
pmc: PMC10940368
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1347818

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Avian, Könczöl, Kubicek, Spary-Kainz and Siebenhofer.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Alexander Avian (A)

Institute for Medical Informatics, and Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Clemens Könczöl (C)

Institute of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Bettina Kubicek (B)

Institute of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Ulrike Spary-Kainz (U)

Institute of General Practice and Evidence-based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Andrea Siebenhofer (A)

Institute of General Practice and Evidence-based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Institute of General Practice, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Classifications MeSH