Neuroendocrine tumor of the appendix masquerading as acute appendicitis with a mucocele on CT scan: a rare finding.
Appendectomy
Appendix
Laparoscopy
Mucocele
Neuroendocrine tumor
Right hemicolectomy
Journal
Surgical case reports
ISSN: 2198-7793
Titre abrégé: Surg Case Rep
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101662125
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Mar 2024
19 Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
31
01
2024
accepted:
14
03
2024
medline:
19
3
2024
pubmed:
19
3
2024
entrez:
19
3
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the appendix are rare and are often discovered incidentally during surgery for acute appendicitis or other unrelated conditions (Modlin et al. in Gastroenterology 128:1717-1751, 2005, Alsaad et al. in Oncol Rep 16:1105-1109, 2006, Frilling et al. in Lancet Oncol 15:e8-e21, 2014). These tumors can range from asymptomatic incidental findings to clinically significant tumors with metastases (Alsaad et al. in Oncol Rep 16:1105-1109, 2006, Gomes et al. in World J Emerg Surg 10:60, 2015, Paiva et al. in Eur J Cancer 38:702-705, 2002, Burke et al. in Am J Surg Pathol. 9:661-674, 1985). This case report presents a rare case of a NET of the appendix presenting as acute appendicitis. A 23-year-old male presented with right lower quadrant abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting for 2 days. A CT scan revealed a mucocoele of the appendix. The patient underwent laparoscopic appendectomy, and the appendix was sent for histopathological examination. The final pathological report confirmed a NET of the appendix with a Ki-67 index of 1% and no lymphovascular invasion. Due to tumor invasion to the cecum and its large size (3-4 cm), the patient underwent right hemicolectomy. The final histopathology report of the resected specimen confirmed the diagnosis of NET of the appendix. The clinical diagnosis of NETs of the appendix can be challenging due to their rarity and non-specific presentation. Symptoms of NETs of the appendix can mimic those of acute appendicitis, making it difficult to differentiate between the two conditions. Imaging studies, such as CT scans, can provide valuable information about the size and location of the tumor (Gomes et al. in World J Emerg Surg 10:60, 2015, Maggard et al. in Ann Surg 240:117-122, 2004, Burke et al. in Am J Surg Pathol. 9:661-674, 1985, Frilling et al. in Lancet Oncol 15:e8-e21, 2014). However, the definitive diagnosis is made through histopathological examination of the resected specimen. The treatment of NETs of the appendix depends on factors such as the size, location, and grade of the tumor. Small tumors confined to the appendix with no lymph-vascular invasion can be treated with appendectomy alone, while larger tumors or those that have spread beyond the appendix may require more extensive surgery, such as right hemicolectomy (Gomes et al. in World J Emerg Surg 10:60, 2015, Mestier et al. in Dig Liver Dis 52:899-911, 2020, Maggard et al. in Ann Surg 240:117-122, 2004, Burke et al. in Am J Surg Pathol. 9:661-674, 1985, Frilling et al. in Lancet Oncol 15:e8-e21, 2014, Pavel et al. in Neuroendocrinology 103:172-185, 2016). In some cases, additional treatments such as chemotherapy or radiation therapy may be recommended. This case report emphasizes the importance of considering NETs of the appendix in the differential diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Imaging studies can provide valuable information, but the definitive diagnosis is made through histopathological examination. The treatment approach for NETs of the appendix depends on various factors and requires a multidisciplinary approach for optimal management.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38499895
doi: 10.1186/s40792-024-01870-5
pii: 10.1186/s40792-024-01870-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
65Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Modlin IM, Kidd M, Latich I, Zikusoka MN, Shapiro MD. Current status of gastrointestinal carcinoids. Gastroenterology. 2005;128(6):1717–51. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2005.03.038 .
doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.03.038
pubmed: 15887161
Alsaad KO, Serra S, Schmitt A, et al. Appendiceal adenocarcinomas and carcinoid tumors: clinicopathological review of 184 cases. Oncol Rep. 2006;16(5):1105–9. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.16.5.1105 .
doi: 10.3892/or.16.5.1105
Gomes CA, Junior CS, Di Saverio S, et al. Acute appendicitis: proposal of a new comprehensive grading system based on clinical, imaging and laparoscopic findings. World J Emerg Surg. 2015;10:60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-015-0055-2 .
doi: 10.1186/s13017-015-0055-2
pubmed: 26640515
pmcid: 4669630
de Mestier L, Walter T, Brixi H, et al. Digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN): French intergroup clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up (SNFGE, GTE, RENATEN, TENPATH, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO, SFR). Dig Liver Dis. 2020;52(8):899–911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2020.05.010 .
doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2020.05.010
Maggard MA, O’Connell JB, Ko CY. Updated population-based review of carcinoid tumors. Ann Surg. 2004;240(1):117–22. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000129358.51409.8d .
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000129358.51409.8d
pubmed: 15213627
pmcid: 1356383
McCusker ME, Cote TR, Clegg LX, Sobin LH. Primary malignant neoplasms of the appendix: a population-based study from the surveillance, epidemiology and end-results program, 1973–1998. Cancer. 2002;94(12):3307–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.10589 .
doi: 10.1002/cncr.10589
pubmed: 12115365
Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumours. 7th ed. USA: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.
Burke AP, Thomas RM, Elsayed AM, Sobin LH. Carcinoids of the appendix. A clinicopathologic study of 107 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1985;9(9):661–74. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-198509000-00001 .
doi: 10.1097/00000478-198509000-00001
Paiva CE, Marques MP, Silva AR, et al. Ki-67 labelling index and the prognosis of gastrointestinal carcinoid tumours. Eur J Cancer. 2002;38(5):702–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-8049(01)00431-6 .
doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(01)00431-6
Frilling A, Modlin IM, Kidd M, et al. Recommendations for management of patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(1):e8–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70362-0 .
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70362-0
pubmed: 24384494
Pavel M, O’Toole D, Costa F, et al. ENETS consensus guidelines update for the management of distant metastatic disease of intestinal, pancreatic, bronchial neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) and NEN of unknown primary site. Neuroendocrinology. 2016;103(2):172–85. https://doi.org/10.1159/0004431711 .
doi: 10.1159/0004431711
pubmed: 26731013
Pape UF, Perren A, Niederle B, et al. ENETS consensus guidelines for the management of patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms from the jejuno-ileum and the appendix including goblet cell carcinomas. Neuroendocrinology. 2012;95(2):135–56. https://doi.org/10.1159/000335587 .
doi: 10.1159/000335587
pubmed: 22262080
Kulke MH, Shah MH, Benson AB, et al. Neuroendocrine tumors, version 1.2015. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015;13(1):78–108. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2015.0012 .
doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2015.0012
pubmed: 25583772
Pickhardt PJ, Levy AD, Rohrmann CA Jr, Kende AI. Primary neoplasms of the appendix manifesting as acute appendicitis: CT findings with pathologic correlation. Radiology. 2002;224(3):775–81. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2243011060 .
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2243011060
pubmed: 12202713