The effect of the cultural formulation interview on therapeutic working alliance: a study protocol.

RCT cultural formulation interview (CFI) empathy migrant patients perceived cultural empathy therapeutic working alliance

Journal

Frontiers in psychiatry
ISSN: 1664-0640
Titre abrégé: Front Psychiatry
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101545006

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 20 10 2023
accepted: 14 02 2024
medline: 19 3 2024
pubmed: 19 3 2024
entrez: 19 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI) is designed to improve understanding of patients' mental health care needs. The lack of empirical evidence on the impact and effectiveness of CFI use in clarifying people's perspectives, experiences, context, and identity, and in preventing cultural misunderstandings between migrant patients and clinicians, inspired this study. The objective is to examine the effect of the CFI on the strength of therapeutic working alliances, and the potential mediating or moderating role of perceived empathy. A multicenter randomized controlled trial will be conducted, involving migrant patients, their confidants, and clinicians. The CFI will be administered in the intervention group, but not in the control group. Validated questionnaires will be used to assess therapeutic working alliances and perceived empathy. T-tests and linear regression analyses will be conducted to investigate between-group differences and possible mediating or moderating effects. This study will indicate whether or not the CFI strengthens the therapeutic working alliance between patients and clinicians, as moderated and/or mediated by perceived empathy. Research on the effect and impact of using the CFI in mental health care for migrant patients is important to clarify whether its use strengthens the therapeutic working alliance with clinicians. This can lead to a reduction in cultural misunderstandings and improve mental health care for migrant patients. The results may also be important for the implementation of the CFI as a standard of care. This research protocol was tailored to the needs of patients in collaboration with experts by experience. It was approved by the Ethical Review Board of the Tilburg Law School and registered in the Clinical Trials Register under number NCT05788315. Positive results may stimulate further implementation of the CFI in clinical practice, and contribute to improving the impact of the CFI on the therapeutic working alliances.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
The Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI) is designed to improve understanding of patients' mental health care needs. The lack of empirical evidence on the impact and effectiveness of CFI use in clarifying people's perspectives, experiences, context, and identity, and in preventing cultural misunderstandings between migrant patients and clinicians, inspired this study. The objective is to examine the effect of the CFI on the strength of therapeutic working alliances, and the potential mediating or moderating role of perceived empathy.
Materials and methods UNASSIGNED
A multicenter randomized controlled trial will be conducted, involving migrant patients, their confidants, and clinicians. The CFI will be administered in the intervention group, but not in the control group. Validated questionnaires will be used to assess therapeutic working alliances and perceived empathy. T-tests and linear regression analyses will be conducted to investigate between-group differences and possible mediating or moderating effects.
Results UNASSIGNED
This study will indicate whether or not the CFI strengthens the therapeutic working alliance between patients and clinicians, as moderated and/or mediated by perceived empathy.
Discussion UNASSIGNED
Research on the effect and impact of using the CFI in mental health care for migrant patients is important to clarify whether its use strengthens the therapeutic working alliance with clinicians. This can lead to a reduction in cultural misunderstandings and improve mental health care for migrant patients. The results may also be important for the implementation of the CFI as a standard of care.
Ethics and dissemination UNASSIGNED
This research protocol was tailored to the needs of patients in collaboration with experts by experience. It was approved by the Ethical Review Board of the Tilburg Law School and registered in the Clinical Trials Register under number NCT05788315. Positive results may stimulate further implementation of the CFI in clinical practice, and contribute to improving the impact of the CFI on the therapeutic working alliances.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38501082
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1322356
pmc: PMC10945007
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1322356

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Brand, Groen, Destoop, Jongsma, Ghane, Sabbe, van Velsen, van Houten, Becan, Al Alyan and Braakman.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Alma M Brand (AM)

Tilburg Law School, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.

Simon P N Groen (SPN)

De Evenaar, Center for Transcultural Psychiatry, GGZ Drenthe, Beilen, Netherlands.

Nathalie Destoop (N)

Mobile 2B Team SPITT and Culture-sensitive Care POZAH, Psychiatric Hospital Sint-Alexius Grimbergen, Brussels, Belgium.

Hannah E Jongsma (HE)

Center for Transcultural Psychiatry Veldzicht, Balkbrug, Netherlands.
University Center of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, Netherlands.

Samrad Ghane (S)

Parnassia Group, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Bernard G C Sabbe (BGC)

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Collaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute, University of Antwerpen, Antwerpen, Belgium.

Harry van Velsen (H)

Consultant, Groningen, Netherlands.

Kurt van Houten (K)

Consultant, Groningen, Netherlands.

Özlem Becan (Ö)

Consultant, Groningen, Netherlands.

Dhiya Al Alyan (D)

Consultant, Groningen, Netherlands.

Mario H Braakman (MH)

Tilburg Law School, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH