Characterization of Pancreatic Fistula after Post-pancreatectomy Acute Pancreatitis.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the clinical significance and risk factors of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after post-pancreatectomy acute pancreatitis (PPAP) in patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

PPAP has been recognized as a critical factor in the pathophysiology of POPF after PD.

METHODS

A total of 817 consecutive patients who underwent elective PD between January 2020 and June 2022 were included. PPAP and POPF were defined in accordance with the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definitions. Multivariate logistic analyses were performed to investigate the risk factors for POPF. Comparisons between PPAP-associated POPF and non-PPAP-associated POPF were made to further characterize this intriguing complication.

RESULTS

Overall, 159 (19.5%) patients developed POPF after PD, of which 73 (45.9%) occurred following PPAP, and the remaining 86 (54.1%) had non-PPAP-associated POPF. Patients with PPAP-associated POPF experienced significantly higher morbidity than patients without POPF. Multivariate analyses revealed distinct risk factors for each POPF type. For PPAP-associated POPF, independent risk factors included estimated blood loss >200 mL (OR 1.93), MPD ≤3 cm (OR 2.88), and soft pancreatic texture (OR 2.01), largely overlapping with FRS (Fistula Risk Score) elements. On the other hand, non-PPAP-associated POPF was associated with age >65 years (OR 1.95), male (OR 2.10), and MPD ≤3 cm (OR 2.57). Notably, among patients with PPAP, the incidence of POPF consistently hovered around 50% regardless of the FRS stratification.

CONCLUSIONS

PPAP-associated POPF presents as a distinct pathophysiology in the development of POPF after PD, potentially opening doors for future prevention strategies targeting the early postoperative period.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of Interest and Source of Funding: The authors report no conflicts of interest to declare. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.