The European livestock resistome.

antimicrobial resistance diversity livestock metagenomics resistome

Journal

mSystems
ISSN: 2379-5077
Titre abrégé: mSystems
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101680636

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Mar 2024
Historique:
medline: 19 3 2024
pubmed: 19 3 2024
entrez: 19 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Metagenomic sequencing has proven to be a powerful tool in the monitoring of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Here, we provide a comparative analysis of the resistome from pigs, poultry, veal calves, turkey, and rainbow trout, for a total of 538 herds across nine European countries. We calculated the effects of per-farm management practices and antimicrobial usage (AMU) on the resistome in pigs, broilers, and veal calves. We also provide an in-depth study of the associations between bacterial diversity, resistome diversity, and AMR abundances as well as co-occurrence analysis of bacterial taxa and antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) and the universality of the latter. The resistomes of veal calves and pigs clustered together, as did those of avian origin, while the rainbow trout resistome was different. Moreover, we identified clear core resistomes for each specific food-producing animal species. We identified positive associations between bacterial alpha diversity and both resistome alpha diversity and abundance. Network analyses revealed very few taxa-ARG associations in pigs but a large number for the avian species. Using updated reference databases and optimized bioinformatics, previously reported significant associations between AMU, biosecurity, and AMR in pig and poultry farms were validated. AMU is an important driver for AMR; however, our integrated analyses suggest that factors contributing to increased bacterial diversity might also be associated with higher AMR load. We also found that dispersal limitations of ARGs are shaping livestock resistomes, and future efforts to fight AMR should continue to emphasize biosecurity measures.IMPORTANCEUnderstanding the occurrence, diversity, and drivers for antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is important to focus future control efforts. So far, almost all attempts to limit AMR in livestock have addressed antimicrobial consumption. We here performed an integrated analysis of the resistomes of five important farmed animal populations across Europe finding that the resistome and AMR levels are also shaped by factors related to bacterial diversity, as well as dispersal limitations. Thus, future studies and interventions aimed at reducing AMR should not only address antimicrobial usage but also consider other epidemiological and ecological factors.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38501800
doi: 10.1128/msystems.01328-23
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0132823

Investigateurs

Haitske Graveland (H)
Bruno Gonzalez-Zorn (B)
Gabriel Moyano (G)
Pascal Sanders (P)
Claire Chauvin (C)
Antonio Battisti (A)
Jeroen Dewulf (J)
Katharina Wadepohl (K)
Dariusz Wasyl (D)
Magdalena Skarzyńska (M)
Magdalena Zajac (M)
Agnieszka Pękala-Safińska (A)
Hristo Daskalov (H)
Katharina D C Stärk (KDC)

Auteurs

Patrick Munk (P)

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.

Dongsheng Yang (D)

Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands, Utrecht.

Timo Röder (T)

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.

Leonie Maier (L)

School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Max Born Crescent, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Thomas Nordahl Petersen (TN)

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.

Ana Sofia Ribeiro Duarte (ASR)

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.

Philip T L C Clausen (PTLC)

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.

Christian Brinch (C)

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.

Liese Van Gompel (L)

Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands, Utrecht.

Roosmarijn Luiken (R)

Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands, Utrecht.

Jaap A Wagenaar (JA)

Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands, Utrecht.

Heike Schmitt (H)

Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands, Utrecht.

Dick J J Heederik (DJJ)

Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands, Utrecht.

Dik J Mevius (DJ)

Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands, Utrecht.
Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Wageningen University & Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.

Lidwien A M Smit (LAM)

Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands, Utrecht.

Alex Bosser (A)

Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands, Utrecht.
Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Wageningen University & Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.

Frank M Aarestrup (FM)

National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.

Classifications MeSH