No evidence for a role of MHC class II genotype in the chemical encoding of heterozygosity and relatedness in Antarctic fur seals.

Antarctic fur seal (Arctocephalus gazella) heterozygosity major histocompatibility complex odour pinniped relatedness

Journal

Proceedings. Biological sciences
ISSN: 1471-2954
Titre abrégé: Proc Biol Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101245157

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Mar 2024
Historique:
medline: 20 3 2024
pubmed: 20 3 2024
entrez: 19 3 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Despite decades of research, surprisingly little is known about the mechanism(s) by which an individual's genotype is encoded in odour. Many studies have focused on the role of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) owing to its importance for survival and mate choice. However, the salience of MHC-mediated odours compared to chemicals influenced by the rest of the genome remains unclear, especially in wild populations where it is challenging to quantify and control for the effects of the genomic background. We addressed this issue in Antarctic fur seals by analysing skin swabs together with full-length MHC DQB II exon 2 sequences and data from 41 genome-wide distributed microsatellites. We did not find any effects of MHC relatedness on chemical similarity and there was also no relationship between MHC heterozygosity and chemical diversity. However, multilocus heterozygosity showed a significant positive association with chemical diversity, even after controlling for MHC heterozygosity. Our results appear to rule out a dominant role of the MHC in the chemical encoding of genetic information in a wild vertebrate population and highlight the need for genome-wide approaches to elucidate the mechanism(s) and specific genes underlying genotype-odour associations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38503331
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.2519
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

20232519

Auteurs

Jonas Tebbe (J)

Department of Evolutionary Population Genetics, Faculty of Biology, Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.
Department of Behavioural Ecology, Bielefeld University, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany.
Department of Animal Behaviour, Bielefeld University, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany.

Katja Havenstein (K)

Unit of Evolutionary Biology / Systematic Zoology, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam-Golm, Germany.

Jaume Forcada (J)

British Antarctic Survey, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 OET, UK.

Ralph Tiedemann (R)

Unit of Evolutionary Biology / Systematic Zoology, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam-Golm, Germany.

Barbara Caspers (B)

Department of Behavioural Ecology, Bielefeld University, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany.
Joint Institute for Individualisation in a Changing Environment (JICE), Bielefeld University and University of Münster, Bielefeld, Germany.

Joseph I Hoffman (JI)

Department of Evolutionary Population Genetics, Faculty of Biology, Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.
Department of Animal Behaviour, Bielefeld University, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany.
British Antarctic Survey, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 OET, UK.
Joint Institute for Individualisation in a Changing Environment (JICE), Bielefeld University and University of Münster, Bielefeld, Germany.
Center for Biotechnology (CeBiTec), Faculty of Biology, Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.

Classifications MeSH