Liposomal bupivacaine intercostal block placed under direct vision reduces morphine use in thoracic surgery.
Liposomal bupivacaine (LB)
epidural
postoperative pain after thoracic surgery
Journal
Journal of thoracic disease
ISSN: 2072-1439
Titre abrégé: J Thorac Dis
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101533916
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Feb 2024
29 Feb 2024
Historique:
received:
07
09
2023
accepted:
29
12
2023
medline:
20
3
2024
pubmed:
20
3
2024
entrez:
20
3
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) and liposomal bupivacaine (LB) are two methods used for postoperative pain control after thoracic surgery. Some studies have compared LB to standard bupivacaine. However, data comparing the outcomes of LB to TEA after minimally invasive lung resection is limited. Therefore, the objective of our study was to compare postoperative pain, opioid usage, and outcomes between patients who received TEA We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent minimally invasive lung resections over an 8-month period. Intraoperatively, patients received either LB under direct vision or a TEA. Pain scores were obtained in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and at 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. Morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) were calculated at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. Postoperative outcomes were then compared between groups. In total, 391 patients underwent minimally invasive lung resection: 236 (60%) wedge resections, 51 (13%) segmentectomies, and 104 (27%) lobectomies. Of these, 326 (83%) received LB intraoperatively. Fewer patients in the LB group experienced postoperative complications (18% Compared to TEA, LB intercostal block placed under direct vision reduced morphine use 48 hours after thoracic surgery. It was also associated with fewer postoperative complications and shorter median hospital LOS. LB is a good alternative to TEA for pain management after minimally invasive lung resection.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) and liposomal bupivacaine (LB) are two methods used for postoperative pain control after thoracic surgery. Some studies have compared LB to standard bupivacaine. However, data comparing the outcomes of LB to TEA after minimally invasive lung resection is limited. Therefore, the objective of our study was to compare postoperative pain, opioid usage, and outcomes between patients who received TEA
Methods
UNASSIGNED
We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent minimally invasive lung resections over an 8-month period. Intraoperatively, patients received either LB under direct vision or a TEA. Pain scores were obtained in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and at 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. Morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) were calculated at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. Postoperative outcomes were then compared between groups.
Results
UNASSIGNED
In total, 391 patients underwent minimally invasive lung resection: 236 (60%) wedge resections, 51 (13%) segmentectomies, and 104 (27%) lobectomies. Of these, 326 (83%) received LB intraoperatively. Fewer patients in the LB group experienced postoperative complications (18%
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
Compared to TEA, LB intercostal block placed under direct vision reduced morphine use 48 hours after thoracic surgery. It was also associated with fewer postoperative complications and shorter median hospital LOS. LB is a good alternative to TEA for pain management after minimally invasive lung resection.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38505026
doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-1405
pii: jtd-16-02-1161
pmc: PMC10944765
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1161-1170Informations de copyright
2024 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-23-1405/coif). A.S. is personally funded by the John D. Mitchell Fellowship. R.B. has research grants and clinical trials support from MedGenome, Roche, Verastem, Genentech, Merck, Bicycles therapeutics, Serum, Intuitive, Siemens, NIH and DOD. Additionally, he has four patents through BWH (no royalties to date) and equity in a new start-up company, Navigation Sciences. These disclosures or conflicts of interest are not relevant to this manuscript. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.