Cervical Nerve Root Block Using a Curved Blunt Needle and Posterior Approach.

cervical disk herniation cervical foraminal stenosis cervical radicular pain cervical radiculopathy cervical selective nerve root block cervical stenosis cervical transforaminal steroid injection Cervical radiculitis

Journal

Pain physician
ISSN: 2150-1149
Titre abrégé: Pain Physician
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100954394

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2024
Historique:
medline: 20 3 2024
pubmed: 20 3 2024
entrez: 20 3 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections have become less popular due to the risk of catastrophic complications they pose. However, cervical nerve root blocks are useful for surgical planning in patients with cervical radicular pain syndromes. Our aim was to find a method of performing cervical selective nerve root blocks that removed the risk of catastrophic complications. Retrospective case review. Academic multidisciplinary spine center. Among patients, 50 consecutive cases were retrospectively reviewed for immediate pain scores and follow-up results. In the intervention, a posterior approach using a curved blunt needle was employed for cervical selective nerve root blocks to minimize the risk of arterial injection. To measure the outcomes, we used quantitative pain severity scores and qualitative responses. This technique detailed in this study has a high immediate analgesic effect that can be used for diagnostic purposes. It is not known if this technique has prognostic value with respect to surgery. The prolonged response rate is about 50%, which is in line with other techniques. This study had no control group. Cervical selective nerve root blocks using a curved blunt needle and a posterior approach are effective in selectively identifying nerves that cause clinical symptoms. This technique minimizes the risk of arterial or spinal cord impingement and therefore may be safer than transforaminal selective nerve root blocks.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections have become less popular due to the risk of catastrophic complications they pose. However, cervical nerve root blocks are useful for surgical planning in patients with cervical radicular pain syndromes.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
Our aim was to find a method of performing cervical selective nerve root blocks that removed the risk of catastrophic complications.
STUDY DESIGN METHODS
Retrospective case review.
SETTING METHODS
Academic multidisciplinary spine center.
METHODS METHODS
Among patients, 50 consecutive cases were retrospectively reviewed for immediate pain scores and follow-up results. In the intervention, a posterior approach using a curved blunt needle was employed for cervical selective nerve root blocks to minimize the risk of arterial injection. To measure the outcomes, we used quantitative pain severity scores and qualitative responses.
RESULTS RESULTS
This technique detailed in this study has a high immediate analgesic effect that can be used for diagnostic purposes. It is not known if this technique has prognostic value with respect to surgery. The prolonged response rate is about 50%, which is in line with other techniques.
LIMITATIONS CONCLUSIONS
This study had no control group.
CONCLUSION(S) CONCLUSIONS
Cervical selective nerve root blocks using a curved blunt needle and a posterior approach are effective in selectively identifying nerves that cause clinical symptoms. This technique minimizes the risk of arterial or spinal cord impingement and therefore may be safer than transforaminal selective nerve root blocks.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38506683

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

161-168

Auteurs

Carl Noe (C)

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.

Michael van Hal (M)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.

Standiford Helm Ii (S)

Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA.

Gabor B Racz (GB)

Department of Anesthesiology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX.

Classifications MeSH