Comparison of ultrasound guided supraclavicular subclavian vein versus infraclavicular subclavian/axillary vein catheterization: A systematic review and meta analysis.

Subclavian vein cannulation axillary vein infraclavicular subclavian meta analysis supraclavicular subclavian ultrasound

Journal

The journal of vascular access
ISSN: 1724-6032
Titre abrégé: J Vasc Access
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100940729

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Mar 2024
Historique:
medline: 20 3 2024
pubmed: 20 3 2024
entrez: 20 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Subclavian vein cannulation is an important technique of central venous cannulation with a supraclavicular and an infraclavicular approach. There are randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which highlight the various differences between these two approaches when accessed via ultrasound. We undertook a meta-analysis to compare the ultrasound guided supraclavicular subclavian and the infraclavicular subclavian/axillary vein cannulation, keeping in mind that the infraclavicular approach may lead to cannulation of either subclavian/axillary vein. This meta-analysis encompassed studies that compared ultrasound-guided supraclavicular subclavian vein and infraclavicular subclavian/axillary vein. Binary outcomes were presented as odds ratios (OR), while continuous outcomes were presented as standardized mean differences (SMD) accompanied by 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Potential trials meeting the eligibility criteria were sought from databases including PubMed, PubMed Central, The Cochrane Library, and EMBASE, covering the period from inception to April 30, 2023. The analysis comprised a total of six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one retrospective observational study collectively involving 1812 patients. The first pass success rate for subclavian vein catheterization was found to be greater with the supraclavicular approach (OR = 1.91 [95% CI 1.04-3.50]; Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular approach for subclavian vein catheterization is superior to the infraclavicular approach for subclavian/axillary vein catheterization, with higher first-pass success rates, shorter catheterization times. However, there were no differences in the complication rates.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND UNASSIGNED
Subclavian vein cannulation is an important technique of central venous cannulation with a supraclavicular and an infraclavicular approach. There are randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which highlight the various differences between these two approaches when accessed via ultrasound. We undertook a meta-analysis to compare the ultrasound guided supraclavicular subclavian and the infraclavicular subclavian/axillary vein cannulation, keeping in mind that the infraclavicular approach may lead to cannulation of either subclavian/axillary vein.
METHODS UNASSIGNED
This meta-analysis encompassed studies that compared ultrasound-guided supraclavicular subclavian vein and infraclavicular subclavian/axillary vein. Binary outcomes were presented as odds ratios (OR), while continuous outcomes were presented as standardized mean differences (SMD) accompanied by 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Potential trials meeting the eligibility criteria were sought from databases including PubMed, PubMed Central, The Cochrane Library, and EMBASE, covering the period from inception to April 30, 2023.
RESULTS UNASSIGNED
The analysis comprised a total of six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one retrospective observational study collectively involving 1812 patients. The first pass success rate for subclavian vein catheterization was found to be greater with the supraclavicular approach (OR = 1.91 [95% CI 1.04-3.50];
CONCLUSION UNASSIGNED
Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular approach for subclavian vein catheterization is superior to the infraclavicular approach for subclavian/axillary vein catheterization, with higher first-pass success rates, shorter catheterization times. However, there were no differences in the complication rates.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38506879
doi: 10.1177/11297298241239092
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

11297298241239092

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Rajathadri Hosur Ravikumar (R)

Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care Medicine AIIMS, New Delhi, India.

Siddhavivek Majage (S)

Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care Medicine AIIMS, New Delhi, India.

Mrudula Prasanna (M)

Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care Medicine AIIMS, New Delhi, India.

Bikash Ranjan Ray (BR)

Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care Medicine AIIMS, New Delhi, India.

Classifications MeSH