The assessment of bladder cancer resectability with bimanual palpation: A prospective study in laparoscopy and open cystectomy patients.

Bladder cancer Cystectomy Exam under anesthesia Margins of excision Muscle-invasive bladder cancer

Journal

Urologic oncology
ISSN: 1873-2496
Titre abrégé: Urol Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9805460

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 10 11 2023
revised: 27 01 2024
accepted: 18 02 2024
medline: 21 3 2024
pubmed: 21 3 2024
entrez: 20 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To evaluate the value of examination under anesthesia (EUA) in the assessment of bladder resectability during cystectomy. This prospective study included consecutive patients undergoing cystectomy for bladder cancer at a single center between June 2017 and October 2020. EUA was conducted before cystectomy by two urologists who assessed the bladder for limited mobility. One examiner was blinded to the imaging results. Soft tissue surgical margin status in the pathological evaluation of a cystectomy specimen served as a measure of resectability. We used multivariable logistic regression models to assess whether EUA performed by blinded or non-blinded examiners is associated with soft tissue positive surgical margins (PSMs) and to calculate the fraction of new information added by such an examination in addition to selected clinical variables. Among the 134 patients analyzed, limited bladder mobility was indicated by the blinded and non-blinded examiners in 23 (17.2%) and 21 (15.7%) cases, respectively. PSMs were identified in 22 (16.4%) patients, more often in patients with limited bladder mobility as assessed by the blinded (odds ratio [OR] 6.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-24.2) and non-blinded examiners (OR 12.9; 95% CI, 2.9-57.5). The fraction of new information added by the blinded and non-blinded examiners was 48.6% and 57.7%, respectively. The enrichment of patients who underwent pure laparoscopic cystectomy (n = 102; 76%) and the inclusion of patients for emergent surgery may limit the generalizability of our findings. The identification of limited bladder mobility during preoperative EUA yielded prognostic information on surgical margin status. Our findings suggest that EUA has the potential to provide valuable insights in the assessment of bladder resectability. However, further research in a larger cohort of patients is warranted to validate and expand on these findings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38508941
pii: S1078-1439(24)00335-1
doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.02.006
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Anna K Czech (AK)

Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland. Electronic address: aka.czech@uj.edu.pl.

Katarzyna Gronostaj (K)

Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

Jakub Frydrych (J)

Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

Kamil Polok (K)

Center for Intensive Care and Perioperative Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

Jakub Fronczek (J)

Center for Intensive Care and Perioperative Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

Przemyslaw Dudek (P)

Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

Lukasz Belch (L)

Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

Marcin Chlosta (M)

Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

Dominik Choragwicki (D)

Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

Tomasz Dymowski (T)

Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

Mateusz Ostachowski (M)

Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

Katarzyna Piatek-Koziej (K)

Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

Mikołaj Przydacz (M)

Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

Pawel Pyrkosz (P)

Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

Tomasz Wiatr (T)

Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

Marcin Wrozek (M)

Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

Piotr L Chlosta (PL)

Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

Classifications MeSH