Tgfbr1 controls developmental plasticity between the hindlimb and external genitalia by remodeling their regulatory landscape.


Journal

Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 09 06 2023
accepted: 13 03 2024
medline: 21 3 2024
pubmed: 21 3 2024
entrez: 21 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The hindlimb and external genitalia of present-day tetrapods are thought to derive from an ancestral common primordium that evolved to generate a wide diversity of structures adapted for efficient locomotion and mating in the ecological niche occupied by the species. We show that despite long evolutionary distance from the ancestral condition, the early primordium of the mouse external genitalia preserved the capacity to take hindlimb fates. In the absence of Tgfbr1, the pericloacal mesoderm generates an extra pair of hindlimbs at the expense of the external genitalia. It has been shown that the hindlimb and the genital primordia share many of their key regulatory factors. Tgfbr1 controls the response to those factors by modulating the accessibility status of regulatory elements that control the gene regulatory networks leading to the formation of genital or hindlimb structures. Our work uncovers a remarkable tissue plasticity with potential implications in the evolution of the hindlimb/genital area of tetrapods, and identifies an additional mechanism for Tgfbr1 activity that might also contribute to the control of other physiological or pathological processes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38509075
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-46870-z
pii: 10.1038/s41467-024-46870-z
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2509

Subventions

Organisme : Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian (Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation)
ID : 36/8l-D/21

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Duarte, P., Brattig Correia, R., Nóvoa, A. & Mallo, M. Regulatory changes associated with the head to trunk developmental transition. BMC Biol. 21, 170 (2023).
pubmed: 37553620 pmcid: 10408190 doi: 10.1186/s12915-023-01675-2
Jurberg, A. D., Aires, R., Varela-Lasheras, I., Nóvoa, A. & Mallo, M. Switching axial progenitors from producing trunk to tail tissues in vertebrate embryos. Dev. Cell 25, 451–462 (2013).
pubmed: 23763947 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.05.009
Binagui-Casas, A., Dias, A., Guillot, C., Metzis, V. & Saunders, D. Building consensus in neuromesodermal research: Current advances and future biomedical perspectives. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 73, 133–140 (2021).
pubmed: 34717142 doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2021.08.003
Tzouanacou, E., Wegener, A., Wymeersch, F. J., Wilson, V. & Nicolas, J. F. Redefining the progression of lineage segregations during mammalian embryogenesis by clonal analysis. Dev. Cell 17, 365–376 (2009).
pubmed: 19758561 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.08.002
Wymeersch, F. J., Wilson, V. & Tsakiridis, A. Understanding axial progenitor biology in vivo and in vitro. Development 148, dev180612 (2021).
pubmed: 33593754 doi: 10.1242/dev.180612
Wilson, V., Olivera-Martinez, I. & Storey, K. G. Stem cells, signals and vertebrate body axis extension. Development 136, 2133–2133 (2009).
doi: 10.1242/dev.039172
Prummel, K. D., Nieuwenhuize, S. & Mosimann, C. The lateral plate mesoderm. Development 147, dev175059 (2020).
pubmed: 32561665 pmcid: 7328003 doi: 10.1242/dev.175059
Seifert, A. W., Harfe, B. D. & Cohn, M. J. Cell lineage analysis demonstrates an endodermal origin of the distal urethra and perineum. Dev. Biol. 318, 143–152 (2008).
pubmed: 18439576 pmcid: 3047571 doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.03.017
Yamada, G. et al. Molecular genetic cascades for external genitalia formation: an emerging organogenesis program. Dev. Dyn. 235, 1738–1752 (2006).
pubmed: 16598715 doi: 10.1002/dvdy.20807
Miyagawa, S. et al. Disruption of the temporally regulated cloaca endodermal β-catenin signaling causes anorectal malformations. Cell Death Differ. 21, 990–997 (2014).
pubmed: 24632946 pmcid: 4013517 doi: 10.1038/cdd.2014.21
Miyagawa, S. et al. Dosage-dependent hedgehog signals integrated with Wnt/β-catenin signaling regulate external genitalia formation as an appendicular program. Development 136, 3969–3978 (2009).
pubmed: 19906864 pmcid: 2778744 doi: 10.1242/dev.039438
Huang, Y. C., Chen, F. & Li, X. Clarification of mammalian cloacal morphogenesis using high-resolution episcopic microscopy. Dev. Biol. 409, 106–113 (2016).
pubmed: 26485363 doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.10.018
Tickle, C. How the embryo makes a limb: determination, polarity and identity. J. Anat. 227, 418–430 (2015).
pubmed: 26249743 pmcid: 4580101 doi: 10.1111/joa.12361
Rallis, C. et al. Tbx5 is required for forelimb bud formation and continued outgrowth. Development 130, 2741–2751 (2003).
pubmed: 12736217 doi: 10.1242/dev.00473
Naiche, L. & Papaioannou, V. E. Tbx4 is not required for hindlimb identity or post-bud hindlimb outgrowth. Development 134, 93–103 (2007).
pubmed: 17164415 doi: 10.1242/dev.02712
Naiche, L. A. & Papaioannou, V. E. Loss of Tbx4 blocks hindlimb development and affects vascularization and fusion of the allantois. Development 130, 2681–2693 (2003).
pubmed: 12736212 doi: 10.1242/dev.00504
Kondo, T., Zakany, J., Innis, J. W. & Duboule, D. Of fingers, toes and penises [1]. Nature 390, 29 (1997).
pubmed: 9363887 doi: 10.1038/36234
Cohn, M. J. Development of the external genitalia: Conserved and divergent mechanisms of appendage patterning. Dev. Dyn. 240, 1108–1115 (2011).
pubmed: 21465625 pmcid: 4761266 doi: 10.1002/dvdy.22631
Lin, C. et al. Delineating a conserved genetic cassette promoting outgrowth of body appendages. PLoS Genet 9, e1003231 (2013).
pubmed: 23358455 pmcid: 3554569 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003231
Tschopp, P. et al. A relative shift in cloacal location repositions external genitalia in amniote evolution. Nature 516, 391–394 (2014).
pubmed: 25383527 pmcid: 4294627 doi: 10.1038/nature13819
Lozovska, A. et al. Tgfbr1 regulates lateral plate mesoderm and endoderm reorganization during the trunk to tail transition. BioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.22.554351 (2023).
Zakin, L., Reversade, B., Kuroda, H., Lyons, K. & De Robertis, E. Sirenomelia in Bmp7 and Tsg compound mutant mice: requirement for Bmp signaling in the development of ventral posterior mesoderm. Development 132, 2489–2499 (2005).
pubmed: 15843411 doi: 10.1242/dev.01822
Suzuki, K. et al. Reduced BMP signaling results in hindlimb fusion with lethal pelvic/urogenital organ aplasia: a new mouse model of sirenomelia. PLoS One 7, e43453 (2012).
pubmed: 23028455 pmcid: 3444444 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043453
Suzuki, K. et al. Regulation of outgrowth and apoptosis for the terminal appendage: External genitalia: Development by concerted actions of BMP signaling. Development 130, 6209–6220 (2003).
pubmed: 14602679 doi: 10.1242/dev.00846
Kajioka, D. et al. Bmp4 is an essential growth factor for the initiation of genital tubercle (GT) outgrowth. Congenit. Anom. (Kyoto) 60, 15–21 (2020).
pubmed: 30714224 doi: 10.1111/cga.12326
Satoh, Y. et al. Regulation of external genitalia development by concerted actions of FGF ligands and FGF receptors. Anat. Embryol. (Berl.) 208, 479–486 (2004).
pubmed: 15340846 doi: 10.1007/s00429-004-0419-9
Haraguchi, R. et al. Molecular analysis of external genitalia formation: the role of fibroblast growth factor (fgf) genes during genital tubercle formation. Development 127, 2471–2479 (2000).
pubmed: 10804187 doi: 10.1242/dev.127.11.2471
Seifert, A. W., Yamaguchi, T. & Cohn, M. J. Functional and phylogenetic analysis shows that Fgf8 is a marker of genital induction in mammals but is not required for external genital development. Development 136, 2643–2651 (2009).
pubmed: 19592577 pmcid: 2709070 doi: 10.1242/dev.036830
Seifert, A. W., Bouldin, C. M., Choi, K. S., Harfe, B. D. & Cohn, M. J. Multiphasic and tissue-specific roles of sonic hedgehog in cloacal septation and external genitalia development. Development 136, 3949–3957 (2009).
pubmed: 19906862 pmcid: 2778742 doi: 10.1242/dev.042291
Haraguchi, R. et al. Unique functions of sonic hedgehog signaling during external genitalia development. Development 128, 4241–4250 (2001).
pubmed: 11684660 doi: 10.1242/dev.128.21.4241
Perriton, C. L., Powles, N., Chiang, C., Maconochie, M. K. & Cohn, M. J. Sonic hedgehog signaling from the urethral epithelium controls external genital development. Dev. Biol. 247, 26–46 (2002).
pubmed: 12074550 doi: 10.1006/dbio.2002.0668
Yamaguchi, T. P., Bradley, A., McMahon, A. P. & Jones, S. A Wnt5a pathway underlies outgrowth of multiple structures in the vertebrate embryo. Development 126, 1211–1223 (1999).
pubmed: 10021340 doi: 10.1242/dev.126.6.1211
Warot, X., Fromental-Ramain, C., Fraulob, V., Chambon, P. & Dollé, P. Gene dosage-dependent effects of the Hoxa-13 and Hoxd-13 mutations on morphogenesis of the terminal parts of the digestive and urogenital tracts. Development 124, 4781–4791 (1997).
pubmed: 9428414 doi: 10.1242/dev.124.23.4781
Scott, V., Morgan, E. A. & Stadler, H. S. Genitourinary functions of Hoxa13 and Hoxd13. J. Biochem. 137, 671–676 https://doi.org/10.1093/jb/mvi086 (2005).
Su, T. et al. LIM homeodomain transcription factor Isl1 affects urethral epithelium differentiation and apoptosis via Shh. Cell Death Dis. 10, 713 (2019).
pubmed: 31558700 pmcid: 6763423 doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-1952-z
Tickle, C. & Towers, M. Sonic hedgehog signaling in limb development. Front Cell Dev. Biol. 5, 14 (2017).
pubmed: 28293554 pmcid: 5328949 doi: 10.3389/fcell.2017.00014
Dias, A. et al. A Tgfbr1/Snai1-dependent developmental module at the core of vertebrate axial elongation. Elife 9, e56615 (2020).
pubmed: 32597756 pmcid: 7324159 doi: 10.7554/eLife.56615
Andersson, O., Reissmann, E. & Ibáñez, C. F. Growth differentiation factor 11 signals through the transforming growth factor-beta receptor ALK5 to regionalize the anterior-posterior axis. EMBO Rep. 7, 831–837 (2006).
pubmed: 16845371 pmcid: 1525155 doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400752
McPherron, A. C., Lawle, A. M. & Lee, S.-J. Regulation of anterior/posterior patterning of the axial skeleton by growth/differentiation factor 11. Nat. Genet 22, 260–264 (1999).
pubmed: 10391213 doi: 10.1038/10320
Matsubara, Y. et al. Anatomical integration of the sacral-hindlimb unit coordinated by GDF11 underlies variation in hindlimb positioning in tetrapods. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1392–1399 (2017).
pubmed: 29046533 doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0247-y
Aires, R. et al. Oct4 is a key regulator of vertebrate trunk length diversity. Dev. Cell 38, 262–274 (2016).
pubmed: 27453501 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.06.021
McPherron, A. C., Huynh, T. V. & Lee, S.-J. Redundancy of myostatin and growth/differentiation factor 11 function. BMC Dev. Biol. 9, 24 (2009).
pubmed: 19298661 pmcid: 2666675 doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-9-24
Garrido-Allepuz, C., González-Lamuño, D. & Ros, M. A. Sirenomelia phenotype in Bmp7;Shh compound mutants: a novel experimental model for studies of caudal body malformations. PLoS One 7, e44962 (2012).
pubmed: 23028704 pmcid: 3444499 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044962
Heldin, C.-H. & Moustakas, A. Signaling receptors for TGF-β family members. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 8, 1–33 (2016).
doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a022053
Goumans, M.-J. et al. Activin receptor-like kinase (ALK)1 is an antagonistic mediator of lateral TGF/ALK5 signaling. Mol. Cell 12, 817–828 (2003).
pubmed: 14580334 doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00386-1
Carvalho, R. L. C. et al. Compensatory signalling induced in the yolk sac vasculature by deletion of TGFβ receptors in mice. J. Cell Sci. 120, 4269–4277 (2007).
pubmed: 18029401 doi: 10.1242/jcs.013169
Ramachandran, A. et al. TGF-β uses a novel mode of receptor activation to phosphorylate SMAD1/5 and induce epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Elife 7, e31756 (2018).
pubmed: 29376829 pmcid: 5832415 doi: 10.7554/eLife.31756
Wang, W. et al. The TGF β type I receptor TGF β RI functions as an inhibitor of BMP signaling in cartilage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 15570–15579 (2019).
pubmed: 31311865 pmcid: 6681752 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1902927116
Aires, R. et al. Tail bud progenitor activity relies on a network comprising Gdf11, Lin28, and Hox13 genes. Dev. Cell 48, 383–395 (2019).
pubmed: 30661984 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2018.12.004
Sridurongrit, S., Larsson, J., Schwartz, R., Ruiz-Lozano, P. & Kaartinen, V. Signaling via the Tgf-β type I receptor Alk5 in heart development. Dev. Biol. 322, 208–218 (2008).
pubmed: 18718461 pmcid: 2677203 doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.07.038
Larsson, J. et al. Abnormal angiogenesis but intact hematopoietic potential in TGF-β type I receptor-deficient mice. EMBO J. 20, 1663–1673 (2001).
pubmed: 11285230 pmcid: 145465 doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.7.1663
Pineault, K. M., Novoa, A., Lozovska, A., Wellik, D. M. & Mallo, M. Two CRISPR/Cas9-mediated methods for targeting complex insertions, deletions, or replacements in mouse. MethodsX 6, 2088–2100 (2019).
pubmed: 31667107 pmcid: 6812322 doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2019.09.003
Wieser, R., Wrana, J. L. & Massague, J. GS domain mutations that constitutively activate T beta R-I, the downstream signaling component in the TGF-beta receptor complex. EMBO J. 14, 2199–2208 (1995).
pubmed: 7774578 pmcid: 398326 doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07214.x
Dünker, N. & Krieglstein, K. Tgfβ2-/-Tgfβ3-/- double knockout mice display severe midline fusion defects and early embryonic lethality. Anat. Embryol. (Berl.) 206, 73–83 (2002).
pubmed: 12478370 doi: 10.1007/s00429-002-0273-6
Yang, L. et al. Isl1 Cre reveals a common Bmp pathway in heart and limb development. Development 133, 1575–1585 (2006).
pubmed: 16556916 doi: 10.1242/dev.02322
Min, H. et al. Fgf-10 is required for both limb and lung development and exhibits striking functional similarity to Drosophila branchless. Genes Dev. 12, 3156–3161 (1998).
pubmed: 9784490 pmcid: 317210 doi: 10.1101/gad.12.20.3156
Davis, C. A., Holmyard, D. P., Millen, K. J. & Joyner, A. L. Examining pattern formation in mouse, chicken and frog embryos with an En-specific antiserum. Development 111, 287–298 (1991).
pubmed: 1680044 doi: 10.1242/dev.111.2.287
Riddle, R. D. et al. Induction of the LIM Homeobox Gene Lmx7 by WNT7a Establishes Dorsoventral Pattern in the Vertebrate Limb. Cell 83, 631–640 (1995).
pubmed: 7585966 doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90103-5
Corces, M. R. et al. An improved ATAC-seq protocol reduces background and enables interrogation of frozen tissues. Nat. Methods 14, 959–962 (2017).
pubmed: 28846090 pmcid: 5623106 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4396
Sheth, R. et al. Distal limb patterning requires modulation of cis-regulatory activities by HOX13. Cell Rep. 17, 2913–2926 (2016).
pubmed: 27974206 pmcid: 5697718 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.11.039
Lex, R. K. et al. GLI transcriptional repression regulates tissue-specific enhancer activity in response to hedgehog signaling. Elife 9, e50670 (2020).
pubmed: 31989924 pmcid: 6986877 doi: 10.7554/eLife.50670
Malkmus, J. et al. Spatial regulation by multiple Gremlin1 enhancers provides digit development with cis-regulatory robustness and evolutionary plasticity. Nat. Commun. 12, 5557 (2021).
pubmed: 34548488 pmcid: 8455560 doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25810-1
Zhu, J., Patel, R., Trofka, A., Harfe, B. D. & Mackem, S. Sonic hedgehog is not a limb morphogen but acts as a trigger to specify all digits in mice. Dev. Cell 57, 2048–2062 (2022).
pubmed: 35977544 pmcid: 9709693 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2022.07.016
Michos, O. et al. Gremlin-mediated BMP antagonism induces the epithelial-mesenchymal feedback signaling controlling metanephric kidney and limb organogenesis. Development 131, 3401–3410 (2004).
pubmed: 15201225 doi: 10.1242/dev.01251
Nissim, S., Hasso, S. M., Fallon, J. F. & Tabin, C. J. Regulation of Gremlin expression in the posterior limb bud. Dev. Biol. 299, 12–21 (2006).
pubmed: 16989805 doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.05.026
Farin, H. F. et al. Tbx2 terminates Shh/Fgf signaling in the developing mouse limb bud by direct repression of Gremlin1. PLoS Genet 9, e1003467 (2013).
pubmed: 23633963 pmcid: 3636256 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003467
Zuniga, A. et al. Mouse limb deformity mutations disrupt a global control region within the large regulatory landscape required for Gremlin expression. Genes Dev. 18, 1553–1564 (2004).
pubmed: 15198975 pmcid: 443518 doi: 10.1101/gad.299904
Li, Q. et al. A Gli silencer is required for robust repression of gremlin in the vertebrate limb bud. Development (Camb.) 141, 1906–1914 (2014).
doi: 10.1242/dev.104299
Lettice, L. A. et al. A long-range Shh enhancer regulates expression in the developing limb and fin and is associated with preaxial polydactyly. Hum. Mol. Genet 12, 1725–1735 (2003).
pubmed: 12837695 doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddg180
Galli, A. et al. Distinct roles of Hand2 in initiating polarity and posterior Shh expression during the onset of mouse limb bud development. PLoS Genet 6, e1000901 (2010).
pubmed: 20386744 pmcid: 2851570 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000901
Leal, F. & Cohn, M. J. Loss and re-emergence of legs in snakes by modular evolution of sonic hedgehog and HOXD report loss and re-emergence of legs in snakes by modular evolution of sonic hedgehog and HOXD enhancers. Curr. Biol. 26, 1–8 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.09.020
Sagai, T. et al. A cluster of three long-range enhancers directs regional Shh expression in the epithelial linings. Development 136, 1665–1674 (2009).
pubmed: 19369396 doi: 10.1242/dev.032714
Jia, S. & Meng, A. TGF β family signaling and development. Development 148, dev188490 (2021).
pubmed: 33712443 doi: 10.1242/dev.188490
Coda, D. M. et al. Distinct modes of SMAD2 chromatin binding and remodeling shape the transcriptional response to NODAL/Activin signaling. Elife 6, 1–31 (2017).
doi: 10.7554/eLife.22474
Coda, D. M. et al. A network of transcription factors governs the dynamics of NODAL/Activin transcriptional responses. J. Cell Sci. 135, jjcs259972 (2022).
doi: 10.1242/jcs.259972
Xi, Q. et al. Genome-wide impact of the BRG1 SWI/SNF chromatin remodeler on the transforming growth factor β transcriptional program. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 1146–1155 (2008).
pubmed: 18003620 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M707479200
Li, Z. et al. Identification of transcription factor binding sites using ATAC-seq. Genome Biol. 20, 45 (2019).
pubmed: 30808370 pmcid: 6391789 doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1642-2
Liang, L. et al. Complementary Alu sequences mediate enhancer–promoter selectivity. Nature 619, 868–875 (2023).
pubmed: 37438529 doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06323-x
Chiang, C. et al. Manifestation of the limb prepattern: limb development in the absence of sonic hedgehog function. Dev. Biol. 236, 421–435 (2001).
pubmed: 11476582 doi: 10.1006/dbio.2001.0346
Hogan, B., Beddington, R., Constantini, F. & Lacy, E. Manipulating the mouse embryo: a laboratory manual. (Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press, 1994).
Dias, A., Martins, G. G., Lopes, A. & Mallo, M. Three and four-dimensional visualization and analysis approaches to study vertebrate axial elongation and segmentation. J. Vis. Exp. 168, e62086 (2021).
Martins, G. G. et al. Optical projection tomography. in Imaging Modalities for Biological and Preclinical Research: A Compendium, Volume 1: Part I: Ex vivo biological imaging (eds Walter, A., Mannheim, J. G. & Caruana, C. J.) i.2.f1-i.2.f11 (IOP Publishing, 2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/978-0-7503-3059-6ch12 .
Lösel, P. D. et al. Introducing Biomedisa as an open-source online platform for biomedical image segmentation. Nat. Commun. 11, 5577 (2020).
pubmed: 33149150 pmcid: 7642381 doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19303-w
Afgan, E. et al. The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2016 update. Nucleic Acids Res 44, W3–W10 (2016).
pubmed: 27137889 pmcid: 4987906 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw343
Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 17, 10–12 (2011).
doi: 10.14806/ej.17.1.200
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).
pubmed: 22388286 pmcid: 3322381 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923
Barnett, D. W., Garrison, E. K., Quinlan, A. R., Strömberg, M. P. & Marth, G. T. Bamtools: A C++ API and toolkit for analyzing and managing BAM files. Bioinformatics 27, 1691–1692 (2011).
pubmed: 21493652 pmcid: 3106182 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr174
Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841–842 (2010).
pubmed: 20110278 pmcid: 2832824 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033
Feng, J., Liu, T., Qin, B., Zhang, Y. & Liu, X. S. Identifying ChIP-seq enrichment using MACS. Nat. Protoc. 7, 1728–1740 (2012).
pubmed: 22936215 doi: 10.1038/nprot.2012.101
Ramírez, F. et al. deepTools2: a next generation web server for deep-sequencing data analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W160–W165 (2016).
pubmed: 27079975 pmcid: 4987876 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw257
Pollard, K. S., Hubisz, M. J., Rosenbloom, K. R. & Siepel, A. Detection of nonneutral substitution rates on mammalian phylogenies. Genome Res. 20, 110–121 (2010).
pubmed: 19858363 pmcid: 2798823 doi: 10.1101/gr.097857.109
Rausch, T., Hsi-Yang Fritz, M., Korbel, J. O. & Benes, V. Alfred: interactive multi-sample BAM alignment statistics, feature counting and feature annotation for long- and short-read sequencing. Bioinformatics 35, 2489–2491 (2019).
pubmed: 30520945 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty1007
Erarslan‐Uysal, B. et al. Chromatin accessibility landscape of pediatric T‐lymphoblastic leukemia and human T‐cell precursors. EMBO Mol. Med. 12, e12104 (2020).
pubmed: 32755029 pmcid: 7507092 doi: 10.15252/emmm.202012104
Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).
pubmed: 25516281 pmcid: 4302049 doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8
Wang, Q. et al. Exploring epigenomic datasets by ChIPseeker. Curr. Protoc. 2, e585 (2022).
pubmed: 36286622 doi: 10.1002/cpz1.585
Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: A Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140 (2009).
pubmed: 19910308 pmcid: 2796818 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616
Kulakovskiy, I. V. et al. HOCOMOCO: towards a complete collection of transcription factor binding models for human and mouse via large-scale ChIP-Seq analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, D252–D259 (2018).
pubmed: 29140464 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1106

Auteurs

Anastasiia Lozovska (A)

Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Rua da Quinta Grande 6, 2780-156, Oeiras, Portugal.

Artemis G Korovesi (AG)

Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Rua da Quinta Grande 6, 2780-156, Oeiras, Portugal.

André Dias (A)

Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Rua da Quinta Grande 6, 2780-156, Oeiras, Portugal.
Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.

Alexandre Lopes (A)

Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Rua da Quinta Grande 6, 2780-156, Oeiras, Portugal.

Donald A Fowler (DA)

Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Rua da Quinta Grande 6, 2780-156, Oeiras, Portugal.

Gabriel G Martins (GG)

Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Rua da Quinta Grande 6, 2780-156, Oeiras, Portugal.

Ana Nóvoa (A)

Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Rua da Quinta Grande 6, 2780-156, Oeiras, Portugal.

Moisés Mallo (M)

Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Rua da Quinta Grande 6, 2780-156, Oeiras, Portugal. mallo@igc.gulbenkian.pt.

Classifications MeSH