Comparing image normalization techniques in an end-to-end model for automated modic changes classification from MRI images.

Automatic classification Deep learning Detection MRI images Modic changes

Journal

Brain & spine
ISSN: 2772-5294
Titre abrégé: Brain Spine
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9918470888906676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 25 08 2023
revised: 07 11 2023
accepted: 20 12 2023
medline: 21 3 2024
pubmed: 21 3 2024
entrez: 21 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Modic Changes (MCs) are MRI alterations in spine vertebrae's signal intensity. This study introduces an end-to-end model to automatically detect and classify MCs in lumbar MRIs. The model's two-step process involves locating intervertebral regions and then categorizing MC types (MC0, MC1, MC2) using paired T1-and T2-weighted images. This approach offers a promising solution for efficient and standardized MC assessment. The aim is to investigate how different MRI normalization techniques affect MCs classification and how the model can be used in a clinical setting. A combination of Faster R-CNN and a 3D Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is employed. The model first identifies intervertebral regions and then classifies MC types (MC0, MC1, MC2) using paired T1-and T2-weighted lumbar MRIs. Two datasets are used for model development and evaluation. The detection model achieves high accuracy in identifying intervertebral areas, with Intersection over Union (IoU) values above 0.7, indicating strong localization alignment. Confidence scores above 0.9 demonstrate the model's accurate levels identification. In the classification task, standardization proves the best performances for MC type assessment, achieving mean sensitivities of 0.83 for MC0, 0.85 for MC1, and 0.78 for MC2, along with balanced accuracy of 0.80 and F1 score of 0.88. The study's end-to-end model shows promise in automating MC assessment, contributing to standardized diagnostics and treatment planning. Limitations include dataset size, class imbalance, and lack of external validation. Future research should focus on external validation, refining model generalization, and improving clinical applicability.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38510635
doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2023.102738
pii: S2772-5294(23)01026-3
pmc: PMC10951698
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

102738

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Andrea Cina (A)

ETH Zürich, Department of Health Sciences and Technologies, Zürich, Switzerland.
Schulthess Klinik, Department of Teaching, Research and Development, Zürich, Switzerland.

Daniel Haschtmann (D)

Schulthess Klinik, Department of Spine Surgery and Neurosurgery, Zürich, Switzerland.

Dimitrios Damopoulos (D)

University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Nicolas Gerber (N)

Personalised Medicine Research, School of Biomedical and Precision Engineering, University of Bern, Switzerland.

Markus Loibl (M)

Schulthess Klinik, Department of Spine Surgery and Neurosurgery, Zürich, Switzerland.

Tamas Fekete (T)

Schulthess Klinik, Department of Spine Surgery and Neurosurgery, Zürich, Switzerland.

Frank Kleinstück (F)

Schulthess Klinik, Department of Spine Surgery and Neurosurgery, Zürich, Switzerland.

Fabio Galbusera (F)

Schulthess Klinik, Department of Teaching, Research and Development, Zürich, Switzerland.

Classifications MeSH