Telehealth Education in Allied Health Care and Nursing: Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey of Student's Perceived Knowledge, Skills, Attitudes, and Experience.

curriculum health care education interdisciplinary education student perspectives telehealth

Journal

JMIR medical education
ISSN: 2369-3762
Titre abrégé: JMIR Med Educ
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101684518

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 21 07 2023
accepted: 13 02 2024
revised: 04 12 2023
medline: 21 3 2024
pubmed: 21 3 2024
entrez: 21 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the growing relevance of telehealth in health care. Assessing health care and nursing students' telehealth competencies is crucial for its successful integration into education and practice. We aimed to assess students' perceived telehealth knowledge, skills, attitudes, and experiences. In addition, we aimed to examine students' preferences for telehealth content and teaching methods within their curricula. We conducted a cross-sectional web-based study in May 2022. A project-specific questionnaire, developed and refined through iterative feedback and face-validity testing, addressed topics such as demographics, personal perceptions, and professional experience with telehealth and solicited input on potential telehealth course content. Statistical analyses were conducted on surveys with at least a 50% completion rate, including descriptive statistics of categorical variables, graphical representation of results, and Kruskal Wallis tests for central tendencies in subgroup analyses. A total of 261 students from 7 bachelor's and 4 master's health care and nursing programs participated in the study. Most students expressed interest in telehealth (180/261, 69% very or rather interested) and recognized its importance in their education (215/261, 82.4% very or rather important). However, most participants reported limited knowledge of telehealth applications concerning their profession (only 7/261, 2.7% stated profound knowledge) and limited active telehealth experience with various telehealth applications (between 18/261, 6.9% and 63/261, 24.1%). Statistically significant differences were found between study programs regarding telehealth interest (P=.005), knowledge (P<.001), perceived importance in education (P<.001), and perceived relevance after the pandemic (P=.004). Practical training with devices, software, and apps and telehealth case examples with various patient groups were perceived as most important for integration in future curricula. Most students preferred both interdisciplinary and program-specific courses. This study emphasizes the need to integrate telehealth into health care education curricula, as students state positive telehealth attitudes but seem to be not adequately prepared for its implementation. To optimally prepare future health professionals for the increasing role of telehealth in practice, the results of this study can be considered when designing telehealth curricula.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the growing relevance of telehealth in health care. Assessing health care and nursing students' telehealth competencies is crucial for its successful integration into education and practice.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
We aimed to assess students' perceived telehealth knowledge, skills, attitudes, and experiences. In addition, we aimed to examine students' preferences for telehealth content and teaching methods within their curricula.
METHODS METHODS
We conducted a cross-sectional web-based study in May 2022. A project-specific questionnaire, developed and refined through iterative feedback and face-validity testing, addressed topics such as demographics, personal perceptions, and professional experience with telehealth and solicited input on potential telehealth course content. Statistical analyses were conducted on surveys with at least a 50% completion rate, including descriptive statistics of categorical variables, graphical representation of results, and Kruskal Wallis tests for central tendencies in subgroup analyses.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 261 students from 7 bachelor's and 4 master's health care and nursing programs participated in the study. Most students expressed interest in telehealth (180/261, 69% very or rather interested) and recognized its importance in their education (215/261, 82.4% very or rather important). However, most participants reported limited knowledge of telehealth applications concerning their profession (only 7/261, 2.7% stated profound knowledge) and limited active telehealth experience with various telehealth applications (between 18/261, 6.9% and 63/261, 24.1%). Statistically significant differences were found between study programs regarding telehealth interest (P=.005), knowledge (P<.001), perceived importance in education (P<.001), and perceived relevance after the pandemic (P=.004). Practical training with devices, software, and apps and telehealth case examples with various patient groups were perceived as most important for integration in future curricula. Most students preferred both interdisciplinary and program-specific courses.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
This study emphasizes the need to integrate telehealth into health care education curricula, as students state positive telehealth attitudes but seem to be not adequately prepared for its implementation. To optimally prepare future health professionals for the increasing role of telehealth in practice, the results of this study can be considered when designing telehealth curricula.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38512310
pii: v10i1e51112
doi: 10.2196/51112
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e51112

Informations de copyright

©Lena Rettinger, Peter Putz, Lea Aichinger, Susanne Maria Javorszky, Klaus Widhalm, Veronika Ertelt-Bach, Andreas Huber, Sevan Sargis, Lukas Maul, Oliver Radinger, Franz Werner, Sebastian Kuhn. Originally published in JMIR Medical Education (https://mededu.jmir.org), 21.03.2024.

Auteurs

Lena Rettinger (L)

Health Assisting Engineering, FH Campus Wien, University of Applied Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Institute of Digital Medicine, Philipps-University & University Hospital of Giessen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

Peter Putz (P)

Competence Center INDICATION, FH Campus Wien, University of Applied Sciences, Vienna, Austria.

Lea Aichinger (L)

Health Assisting Engineering, FH Campus Wien, University of Applied Sciences, Vienna, Austria.

Susanne Maria Javorszky (SM)

Logopedics - Phoniatrics - Audiology, FH Campus Wien, University of Applied Sciences, Vienna, Austria.

Klaus Widhalm (K)

Physiotherapy, FH Campus Wien, University of Applied Sciences, Vienna, Austria.

Veronika Ertelt-Bach (V)

Occupational Therapy, FH Campus Wien, University of Applied Sciences, Vienna, Austria.

Andreas Huber (A)

Orthoptics, FH Campus Wien, University of Applied Sciences, Vienna, Austria.

Sevan Sargis (S)

Midwifery, FH Campus Wien, University of Applied Sciences, Vienna, Austria.

Lukas Maul (L)

Health Assisting Engineering, FH Campus Wien, University of Applied Sciences, Vienna, Austria.

Oliver Radinger (O)

Competence Center Nursing Sciences, FH Campus Wien, University of Applied Sciences, Vienna, Austria.

Franz Werner (F)

Health Assisting Engineering, FH Campus Wien, University of Applied Sciences, Vienna, Austria.

Sebastian Kuhn (S)

Institute of Digital Medicine, Philipps-University & University Hospital of Giessen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

Classifications MeSH