Assessing Knowledge, Competence, and Performance Following Web-Based Education on Early Breast Cancer Management: Health Care Professional Questionnaire Study and Anonymized Patient Records Analysis.

continuing medical education early breast cancer performance risk stratification shared decision-making

Journal

JMIR formative research
ISSN: 2561-326X
Titre abrégé: JMIR Form Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101726394

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 24 07 2023
accepted: 07 02 2024
revised: 06 02 2024
medline: 21 3 2024
pubmed: 21 3 2024
entrez: 21 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Web-based learning activities are key components of continuing medical education (CME) for health care professionals (HCPs). However, the published outcomes of web-based educational interventions for early breast cancer (EBC) are limited. This study aims to objectively assess knowledge, competence, and performance among HCPs following participation in 2 EBC-focused CME activities and to identify the remaining educational gaps. We developed 2 CME-accredited web-based educational activities addressing high-risk EBC, including integration of shared decision-making to optimize patient care (touchMDT) and stratification for early identification of high-risk patients and novel treatment strategies (touchPANEL DISCUSSION). Knowledge, competence, and performance were assessed before and after the activities against an expanded outcomes framework (levels 1-5) using self-reported questionnaires and an analysis of anonymized data extracted from patient records. Six months after the launch of the activity, 7047 and 8989 HCP participants engaged with touchMDT and touchPANEL DISCUSSION, respectively. The overall satisfaction was 82% (a total score of 20.6 out of 25) for the touchMDT and 88% (a total score of 21.9 out of 25) for the touchPANEL DISCUSSION. For the evaluation of knowledge and competence (50 respondents before the activity and 50 learners after the activity), there was a significant increase in the mean number of correctly answered questions from pre- to postactivity (touchMDT: median 4.0, IQR 3.0-5.0 to median 5.5, IQR 4.0-7.0; mean 4.00, SD 1.39 to mean 5.30, SD 1.56 and touchPANEL DISCUSSION: median 4.0, IQR 4.0-5.0 to median 6.0, IQR 5.0-7.0; mean 4.32, SD 1.30 to mean 5.88, SD 1.49; both P<.001). A significant improvement in self-reported performance (50 respondents before the activity and 50 learners after the activity) was observed in a combined analysis of both activities (median 3.0, IQR 2.0-3.0 to median 4.0, IQR 3.0-5.0; mean 2.82, SD 1.08 to mean 4.16, SD 1.45; P<.001). Patient record analysis (50 respondents before the activity and 50 learners after the activity) showed that the HCPs used a range of measures to determine EBC recurrence risk and revealed no significant differences in adjuvant therapies used before and after the activity (P=.97 and P>.99 for Ki-67 <20% and Ki-67 ≥20% tumors, respectively). The remaining educational gaps included strategies for implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice and the use of genetic and biomarker testing to guide treatment selection. Brief, web-based CME activities on EBC were associated with an improvement in HCP knowledge, competence, and self-reported performance and can help identify unmet needs to inform the design of future CME activities.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Web-based learning activities are key components of continuing medical education (CME) for health care professionals (HCPs). However, the published outcomes of web-based educational interventions for early breast cancer (EBC) are limited.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This study aims to objectively assess knowledge, competence, and performance among HCPs following participation in 2 EBC-focused CME activities and to identify the remaining educational gaps.
METHODS METHODS
We developed 2 CME-accredited web-based educational activities addressing high-risk EBC, including integration of shared decision-making to optimize patient care (touchMDT) and stratification for early identification of high-risk patients and novel treatment strategies (touchPANEL DISCUSSION). Knowledge, competence, and performance were assessed before and after the activities against an expanded outcomes framework (levels 1-5) using self-reported questionnaires and an analysis of anonymized data extracted from patient records.
RESULTS RESULTS
Six months after the launch of the activity, 7047 and 8989 HCP participants engaged with touchMDT and touchPANEL DISCUSSION, respectively. The overall satisfaction was 82% (a total score of 20.6 out of 25) for the touchMDT and 88% (a total score of 21.9 out of 25) for the touchPANEL DISCUSSION. For the evaluation of knowledge and competence (50 respondents before the activity and 50 learners after the activity), there was a significant increase in the mean number of correctly answered questions from pre- to postactivity (touchMDT: median 4.0, IQR 3.0-5.0 to median 5.5, IQR 4.0-7.0; mean 4.00, SD 1.39 to mean 5.30, SD 1.56 and touchPANEL DISCUSSION: median 4.0, IQR 4.0-5.0 to median 6.0, IQR 5.0-7.0; mean 4.32, SD 1.30 to mean 5.88, SD 1.49; both P<.001). A significant improvement in self-reported performance (50 respondents before the activity and 50 learners after the activity) was observed in a combined analysis of both activities (median 3.0, IQR 2.0-3.0 to median 4.0, IQR 3.0-5.0; mean 2.82, SD 1.08 to mean 4.16, SD 1.45; P<.001). Patient record analysis (50 respondents before the activity and 50 learners after the activity) showed that the HCPs used a range of measures to determine EBC recurrence risk and revealed no significant differences in adjuvant therapies used before and after the activity (P=.97 and P>.99 for Ki-67 <20% and Ki-67 ≥20% tumors, respectively). The remaining educational gaps included strategies for implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice and the use of genetic and biomarker testing to guide treatment selection.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Brief, web-based CME activities on EBC were associated with an improvement in HCP knowledge, competence, and self-reported performance and can help identify unmet needs to inform the design of future CME activities.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38512328
pii: v8i1e50931
doi: 10.2196/50931
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e50931

Informations de copyright

©Michael Gnant, Khatijah Lim Abdullah, Frances Boyle, Chiun-Sheng Huang, Katie Bickford, Sola Neunie, Alexander Noble, Anne Nunn, Caroline Sproat, Nadia Harbeck, Carlos Barrios. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 21.03.2024.

Auteurs

Michael Gnant (M)

Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Khatijah Lim Abdullah (KL)

Department of Nursing, School of Medical and Life Sciences, Sunway University, Selangor, Malaysia.

Frances Boyle (F)

Patricia Ritchie Centre for Cancer Care and Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Chiun-Sheng Huang (CS)

Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan.

Katie Bickford (K)

touch Independent Medical Education Limited, Stockport, United Kingdom.

Sola Neunie (S)

touch Independent Medical Education Limited, Stockport, United Kingdom.

Alexander Noble (A)

touch Independent Medical Education Limited, Stockport, United Kingdom.

Anne Nunn (A)

touch Independent Medical Education Limited, Stockport, United Kingdom.

Caroline Sproat (C)

touch Independent Medical Education Limited, Stockport, United Kingdom.

Nadia Harbeck (N)

Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital of Munich Ludwig Maximilian, Munich, Germany.

Carlos Barrios (C)

Latin American Cooperative Group and Oncoclínicas Group, Hospital São Lucas da Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

Classifications MeSH