Human-Prosthetic Interaction (HumanIT): A study protocol for a clinical trial evaluating brain neuroplasticity and functional performance after lower limb loss.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 07 09 2023
accepted: 13 02 2024
medline: 21 3 2024
pubmed: 21 3 2024
entrez: 21 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Lower limb amputation contributes to structural and functional brain alterations, adversely affecting gait, balance, and overall quality of life. Therefore, selecting an appropriate prosthetic ankle is critical in enhancing the well-being of these individuals. Despite the availability of various prostheses, their impact on brain neuroplasticity remains poorly understood. The primary objective is to examine differences in the degree of brain neuroplasticity using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between individuals wearing a new passive ankle prosthesis with an articulated ankle joint and a standard passive prosthesis, and to examine changes in brain neuroplasticity within these two prosthetic groups. The second objective is to investigate the influence of prosthetic type on walking performance and quality of life. The final objective is to determine whether the type of prosthesis induces differences in the walking movement pattern. Participants with a unilateral transtibial amputation will follow a 24-week protocol. Prior to rehabilitation, baseline MRI scans will be performed, followed by allocation to the intervention arms and commencement of rehabilitation. After 12 weeks, baseline functional performance tests and a quality of life questionnaire will be administered. At the end of the 24-week period, participants will undergo the same MRI scans, functional performance tests and questionnaire to evaluate any changes. A control group of able-bodied individuals will be included for comparative analysis. This study aims to unravel the differences in brain neuroplasticity and prosthesis type in patients with a unilateral transtibial amputation and provide insights into the therapeutic benefits of prosthetic devices. The findings could validate the therapeutic benefits of more advanced lower limb prostheses, potentially leading to a societal impact ultimately improving the quality of life for individuals with lower limb amputation. NCT05818410 (Clinicaltrials.gov).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Lower limb amputation contributes to structural and functional brain alterations, adversely affecting gait, balance, and overall quality of life. Therefore, selecting an appropriate prosthetic ankle is critical in enhancing the well-being of these individuals. Despite the availability of various prostheses, their impact on brain neuroplasticity remains poorly understood.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
The primary objective is to examine differences in the degree of brain neuroplasticity using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between individuals wearing a new passive ankle prosthesis with an articulated ankle joint and a standard passive prosthesis, and to examine changes in brain neuroplasticity within these two prosthetic groups. The second objective is to investigate the influence of prosthetic type on walking performance and quality of life. The final objective is to determine whether the type of prosthesis induces differences in the walking movement pattern.
METHODS METHODS
Participants with a unilateral transtibial amputation will follow a 24-week protocol. Prior to rehabilitation, baseline MRI scans will be performed, followed by allocation to the intervention arms and commencement of rehabilitation. After 12 weeks, baseline functional performance tests and a quality of life questionnaire will be administered. At the end of the 24-week period, participants will undergo the same MRI scans, functional performance tests and questionnaire to evaluate any changes. A control group of able-bodied individuals will be included for comparative analysis.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
This study aims to unravel the differences in brain neuroplasticity and prosthesis type in patients with a unilateral transtibial amputation and provide insights into the therapeutic benefits of prosthetic devices. The findings could validate the therapeutic benefits of more advanced lower limb prostheses, potentially leading to a societal impact ultimately improving the quality of life for individuals with lower limb amputation.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
NCT05818410 (Clinicaltrials.gov).

Identifiants

pubmed: 38512879
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299869
pii: PONE-D-23-27271
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05818410']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0299869

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2024 Lathouwers et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Auteurs

Elke Lathouwers (E)

Human Physiology and Sports Physiotherapy research group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
BruBotics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

Bruno Tassignon (B)

Human Physiology and Sports Physiotherapy research group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

Alexandre Maricot (A)

Human Physiology and Sports Physiotherapy research group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

Ahmed Radwan (A)

KU Leuven, Department of Imaging and pathology, Translational MRI, Leuven, Belgium.

Maarten Naeyaert (M)

Department of Radiology and Magnetic Resonance, UZ Brussel, Jette, Belgium.

Hubert Raeymaekers (H)

Department of Radiology and Magnetic Resonance, UZ Brussel, Jette, Belgium.

Peter Van Schuerbeek (P)

Department of Radiology and Magnetic Resonance, UZ Brussel, Jette, Belgium.

Stefan Sunaert (S)

KU Leuven, Department of Imaging and pathology, Translational MRI, Leuven, Belgium.
UZ Leuven, Department of Radiology, Leuven, Belgium.

Johan De Mey (J)

Department of Radiology and Magnetic Resonance, UZ Brussel, Jette, Belgium.

Kevin De Pauw (K)

Human Physiology and Sports Physiotherapy research group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
BruBotics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Strategic Research Program 'Exercise and the Brain in Health & Disease: The Added Value of Human-Centered Robotics', Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

Classifications MeSH