High-resolution co-seismic fault offsets of the 2023 Türkiye earthquake ruptures using satellite imagery.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 02 11 2023
accepted: 19 02 2024
medline: 22 3 2024
pubmed: 22 3 2024
entrez: 22 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

On February 6, 2023, southern Türkiye was struck by two large earthquakes at 01:17 UTC (Mw=7.8, Pazarcık, Kahramanmaraş) and 10:30 UTC (Mw = 7.6, Elbistan, Kahramanmaraş), causing severe damage at the complex junction of the Dead Sea Fault (DSF), the Cyprus Arc and the East Anatolian Fault Zone (EAFZ). The ruptures propagated along several known strands of the southwestern termination of the EAFZ, the main Pazarcık and Karasu valley faults, and the Çardak-Sürgü fault. Here we present the high-resolution mapping of the entire coseismic surface rupture and an estimate of the rupture width, total and on-fault offset, and diffuse deformation obtained a few days to three months after the two mainshocks. The mapping is derived from image correlation of Sentinel-2 optical satellite imagery and validated with offset measurements collected on the ground. We find that the ruptures extend over lengths of 310 km and 140 km for the Mw 7.8 and Mw 7.6 mainshocks, respectively. The maximum offsets reach 7.5 ± 0.8 m and 8.7 ± 0.8 m near the epicenters of the Mw 7.8 and Mw 7.6 events, respectively. We propose a segmentation of the two ruptures based on these observations, and further discuss the location of the potential supershear rupture. The use of optical image correlation, complemented by field investigations along earthquake faults, provides new insights into seismic hazard assessment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38514658
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55009-5
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-55009-5
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

6834

Subventions

Organisme : Agence Nationale de la Recherche
ID : ANR-20-CE01-0006
Organisme : ESA
ID : NoR - Project 1c15aa

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Ambraseys, N. & Jackson, J. Faulting associated with historical and recent earthquakes in the eastern mediterranean region. Geophys. J. Int. 133, 390–406. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.1998.00508.x . https://academic.oup.com/gji/article-pdf/133/2/390/1550918/133-2-390.pdf (1998).
Ambraseys, N. N. Temporary seismic quiescence: Se Turkey. Geophys. J. Int. 96, 311–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1989.tb04453.x . https://academic.oup.com/gji/article-pdf/96/2/311/1680298/96-2-311.pdf (1989).
Özkan, A., Yavaşoğlu, H. H. & Masson, F. Present-day strain accumulations and fault kinematics at the Hatay triple junction using new geodetic constraints. Tectonophysics 854, 229819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2023.229819 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2023.229819
Yıldız, S. S. et al. Determination of recent tectonic deformations in the vicinity of Adana–Osmaniye–Hatay–Gaziantep triple junction region by half-space modeling. C. R. Géosci. 352, 225–234. https://doi.org/10.5802/crgeos.39 (2020).
doi: 10.5802/crgeos.39
Aktug, B. et al. Slip rates and seismic potential on the east anatolian fault system using an improved gps velocity field. J. Geodyn. 94–95, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2016.01.001 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.jog.2016.01.001
Karabacak, V. et al. The 2023 Pazarcık (Kahramanmaraş;, Türkiye) earthquake Mw 7.7: Implications for surface rupture dynamics along the East Anatolian Fault Zone. J. Geol. Soc. 180, jgs2023–020. https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2023-020 . https://www.lyellcollection.org/doi/pdf/10.1144/jgs2023-020 (2023).
Barbot, S. et al. Slip distribution of the February 6, 2023 Mw 7.8 and Mw 7.6, kahramanmaraş, Turkey earthquake sequence in the East Anatolian Fault Zone. Seismica https://doi.org/10.26443/seismica.v2i3.502 (2023).
Qu, Z., Wang, F., Chen, X., Wang, X. & Zhou, Z. Rapid report of seismic damage to hospitals in the 2023 Turkey earthquake sequences. Earthq. Res. Adv. 3, 100234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eqrea.2023.100234 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.eqrea.2023.100234
Okuwaki, R., Yagi, Y., Taymaz, T. & Hicks, S. P. Multi-scale rupture growth with alternating directions in a complex fault network during the 2023 south-eastern türkiye and Syria earthquake doublet. Geophys. Res. Lett. 50, e2023GL103480. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL103480 . https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2023GL103480 (2023).
Karabulut, H., Güvercin, S. E., Hollingsworth, J. & Konca, A. Z. Long silence on the East Anatolian Fault Zone (Southern Turkey) ends with devastating double earthquakes (6 February 2023) over a seismic gap: implications for the seismic potential in the Eastern Mediterranean region. J. Geol. Soc. 180, jgs2023–021. https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2023-021 . https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/jgs/article-pdf/doi/10.1144/jgs2023-021/5846387/jgs2023-021.pdf . (2023)
Jia, Z. et al. The complex dynamics of the 2023 kahramanmaraş, Turkey, Mw 7.8-7.7 earthquake doublet. Science 381, 985–990. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adi0685 . https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.adi0685 (2023).
Butler, R., Spencer, S. & Griffiths, H. Transcurrent fault activity on the Dead Sea Transform in Lebanon and its implications for plate tectonics and seismic hazard. J. Geol. Soc. 154, 757–760. https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.154.5.0757 . https://www.lyellcollection.org/doi/pdf/10.1144/gsjgs.154.5.0757 (1997).
Karabacak, V., Altunel, E., Meghraoui, M. & Akyüz, H. Field evidences from northern Dead Sea Fault Zone (South Turkey): New findings for the initiation age and slip rate. Tectonophysics 480, 172–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2009.10.001 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2009.10.001
Duman, T. Y. & Ömer Emre. The East Anatolian Fault: geometry, segmentation and jog characteristics. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 372, 495–529. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP372.14 . https://www.lyellcollection.org/doi/pdf/10.1144/SP372.14 (2013).
Emre, Ö. et al. Active fault database of Turkey. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 16, 3229–3275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-0041-2 (2018).
doi: 10.1007/s10518-016-0041-2
Nalbant, S. S., McCloskey, J., Steacy, S. & Barka, A. A. Stress accumulation and increased seismic risk in eastern Turkey. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 195, 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00592-1 (2002).
doi: 10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00592-1
Meghraoui, M. et al. Evidence for 830 years of seismic quiescence from palaeoseismology, archaeoseismology and historical seismicity along the dead sea fault in Syria. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 210, 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(03)00144-4 (2003).
doi: 10.1016/S0012-821X(03)00144-4
Akyuz, H. S., Altunel, E., Karabacak, V. & Yalciner, C. C. Historical earthquake activity of the northern part of the dead sea fault zone, southern Turkey. Tectonophysics 426, 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2006.08.005 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2006.08.005
Meghraoui, M. Paleoseismic History of the Dead Sea Fault Zone, 1–20 (Springer, 2014).
Yönlü, n., Altunel, E. & Karabacak, V. Geological and geomorphological evidence for the southwestern extension of the East Anatolian Fault Zone, Turkey. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 469, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.03.034 (2017).
King, G. & Nábělek, J. Role of fault bends in the initiation and termination of earthquake rupture. Science 228, 984–987. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.228.4702.984 . https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.228.4702.984 (1985).
Milliner, C. W. et al. Quantifying near-field and off-fault deformation patterns of the 1992 Mw 7.3 Landers earthquake. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 16, 1577–1598. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GC005693 . https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/2014GC005693 (2015).
Gold, R. D. et al. On-and off-fault deformation associated with the September 2013 Mw 7.7 Balochistan earthquake: Implications for geologic slip rate measurements. 660, 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2015.08.019 (2015).
Scott, C. P. et al. Kumamoto, Japan, earthquake: 3-D deformation along the fault and within the damage zone constrained from differential lidar topography. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 123, 6138–6155. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB015581(2018) . https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2018JB015581 (2016).
Klinger, Y. et al. Earthquake damage patterns resolve complex rupture processes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 10279–10287. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL078842 . https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2018GL078842 (2018).
Antoine, S. L. et al. Ridgecrest, California, ruptures. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 111, 2275–2302. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120210036(2021) . https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/ssa/bssa/article-pdf/111/5/2275/5651823/bssa-2021036.1.pdf (2019).
Goldberg, D. E. et al. Rapid Characterization of the February 2023 Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye. Earthq. Seq. Seismic Rec. 3, 156–167. https://doi.org/10.1785/0320230009 (2023).
doi: 10.1785/0320230009
Mai, P. M. et al. in South-central Türkiye and northwestern Syria: Initial observations and analyses. Seismic Rec. 3, 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1785/0320230007(2023) . https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/ssa/tsr/article-pdf/3/2/105/5840910/tsr-2023007.1.pdf (2023).
Delouis, B., van den Ende, M. & Ampuero, J.-P. Kinematic rupture model of the February 6th 2023 Mw7. 8 Turkey earthquake from a large set of near-source strong motion records combined by GNSS offsets reveals intermittent supershear rupture. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120230077 . https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/ssa/bssa/article-pdf/doi/10.1785/0120230077/6010681/bssa-2023077.1.pdf (2023).
Abdelmeguid, M. et al. Dynamics of episodic supershear in the 2023 m7. 8 kahramanmaraş/pazarcik earthquake, revealed by near-field records and computational modeling. Commun. Earth Environ. 4, 456. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-01131-7 (2023).
Lomax, A. Precise, NLL-SSST-coherence hypocenter catalog for the 2023 Mw 7.8 and Mw 7.6 SE Turkey earthquake sequence. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7699882 (2023).
Styron, R. & Pagani, M. The GEM global active faults database. Earthq. Spectra 36, 160–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293020944182 (2020).
doi: 10.1177/8755293020944182
An, Q. et al. Three-dimensional deformation of the 2023 Turkey Mw 7.8 and Mw 7.7 earthquake sequence obtained by fusing optical and SAR images. Remote Sens . https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15102656 (2023).
Li, C. et al. Strain threshold for the formation of coseismic surface rupture. Geophys. Res. Lett. 50, e2023GL103666. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL103666 . https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2023GL103666 (2023).
Provost, F. et al. Terrain deformation measurements from optical satellite imagery: The MPIC-OPT processing services for geohazards monitoring. Remote Sens. Environ. 274, 112949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.112949 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2022.112949
Rosu, A.-M., Pierrot-Deseilligny, M., Delorme, A., Binet, R. & Klinger, Y. Measurement of ground displacement from optical satellite image correlation using the free open-source software micmac. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 100, 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.03.002 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.03.002
Rupnik, E., Daakir, M. & Pierrot Deseilligny, M. Micmac-a free, open-source solution for photogrammetry. Open Geospatial Data Softw. Stand. 2, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40965-017-0027-2 (2017).
doi: 10.1186/s40965-017-0027-2
Leprince, S., Barbot, S., Ayoub, F. & Avouac, J.-P. Automatic and precise orthorectification, coregistration, and subpixel correlation of satellite images, application to ground deformation measurements. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 45, 1529–1558. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2006.888937 (2007).
doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2006.888937
Reitman, N. G. et al. Kahramanmaraş, Turkey (Türkiye), earthquake sequence. Seismic Rec. 3, 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1785/0320230029(2023) . https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/ssa/tsr/article-pdf/3/4/289/6004245/tsr-2023029.1.pdf (2023).
Taftsoglou, M., Valkaniotis, S., Papathanassiou, G., Karantanellis, E. Satellite imagery for rapid detection of liquefactionsurface manifestations: The case study of Türkiye-Syria. Earthquakes. Remote Sens. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15174190 (2023).
Duman, T. Y. et al. Seismotectonic database of Turkey. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 16, 3277–3316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9965-9 (2018).
doi: 10.1007/s10518-016-9965-9
He, L. et al. Coseismic kinematics of the 2023 Kahramanmaras, Turkey earthquake sequence from inSAR and optical data. Geophys. Res. Lett. 50, e2023GL104693. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104693 . https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2023GL104693 (2023).
Melgar, D. et al. Sub- and super-shear ruptures during the 2023 Mw 7.8 and Mw 7.6 earthquake doublet in se Türkiye. Seismica https://doi.org/10.26443/seismica.v2i3.387 (2023).
Vallée, M., Landès, M., Shapiro, N. M. & Klinger, Y. The 14 November 2001 Kokoxili (Tibet) earthquake: High-frequency seismic radiation originating from the transitions between sub-Rayleigh and supershear rupture velocity regimes. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 113. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB005520(2008) . https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2007JB005520 (2001).
Bruhat, L., Fang, Z. & Dunham, E. M. Rupture complexity and the supershear transition on rough faults. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 121, 210–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JB012512 . https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/2015JB012512 (2016).
Wang, Z. et al. Dynamic rupture process of the 2023 Mw 7.8 Kahramanmaraş earthquake (SE Türkiye): Variable rupture speed and implications for seismic hazard. Geophys. Res. Lett. 50, e2023GL104787. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104787 . https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2023GL104787 (2023).
Bouchon, M. et al. Faulting characteristics of supershear earthquakes. Earthquake supershear rupture speeds. Tectonophysics 493, 244–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2010.06.011 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2010.06.011
Gabriel, A. A., Ulrich, T., Marchandon, M., Biemiller, J. & Rekoske, J. 3D dynamic rupture modeling of the 6 February 2023, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey Mw 7.8 and 7.7 earthquake doublet using early observations. Seism. rec. 3(4), 342–356. https://doi.org/10.1785/0320230028 (2023).
doi: 10.1785/0320230028
Xu, L. et al. The 2023 Mw 7.8 and 7.6 earthquake doublet in southeast türkiye: Coseismic and early postseismic deformation, faulting model, and potential seismic hazard. Seismol. Res. Lett 1–12 (2023).
Kame, N., Rice, J. R. & Dmowska, R. Effects of prestress state and rupture velocity on dynamic fault branching. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 108. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JB002189 . https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2002JB002189 (2003).
Rousseau, C.-E. & Rosakis, A. J. Dynamic path selection along branched faults: Experiments involving sub-Rayleigh and supershear ruptures. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 114. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB006173 . https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2008JB006173 (2009).
Liu, C. et al. Complex multi-fault rupture and triggering during the 2023 earthquake doublet in southeastern Türkiye. Nat. Commun. 14, 5564. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41404-5 (2023).
doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41404-5 pubmed: 37689816 pmcid: 10492857
Dolan, J. F. & Haravitch, B. D. How well do surface slip measurements track slip at depth in large strike-slip earthquakes? The importance of fault structural maturity in controlling on-fault slip versus off-fault surface deformation. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 388, 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.11.043 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2013.11.043
Ragon, T., Sladen, A. & Simons, M. Accounting for uncertain fault geometry in earthquake source inversions—I: Theory and simplified application. Geophys. J. Int. 214, 1174–1190. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy187 . https://academic.oup.com/gji/article-pdf/214/2/1174/25050637/ggy187.pdf (2018).
Xu, X. et al. Refining the shallow slip deficit. Geophys. J. Int. 204, 1867–1886. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv563 . https://academic.oup.com/gji/article-pdf/204/3/1867/17369820/ggv563.pdf (2016).
Marchandon, M., Hollingsworth, J. & Radiguet, M. Origin of the shallow slip deficit on a strike slip fault: Influence of elastic structure, topography, data coverage, and noise. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 554, 116696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116696 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116696
Stumpf, A., Michéa, D. & Malet, J.-P. Improved co-registration of Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 imagery for earth surface motion measurements. Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10020160 (2018).
doi: 10.3390/rs10020160
Provost, F., Malet, J.-P., Michéa, D., Déprez, A., Pointal, E., Pacini, F. ForM@Ter - EOST (2024): Terrain displacement from the Turkiye–Syria earthquakes of February 6, 2023 obtained with the GDM-OPT-ETQ service applied on Sentinel-2 optical imagery. https://doi.org/10.25577/EWT8-KY06 (2024).
He, L. et al. Coseismic and early postseismic slip models of the 2021 Mw 7.4 Maduo earthquake (western China) estimated by space-based geodetic data. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2021GL095860. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095860 . https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2021GL095860 (2021).
Wen, Y., Li, Z., Xu, C., Ryder, I. & Bürgmann, R. Postseismic motion after the 2001 Mw 7.8 Kokoxili earthquake in Tibet observed by InSAR time series. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 117. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB009043 . https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2011JB009043 (2012).
Weertman, J. & Weertman, J. R. Elementary Dislocation Theory (The Macmillan Company, 1964).
Savage, J. & Burford, R. Geodetic determination of relative plate motion in central California. J. Geophys. Res. 1896–1977(78), 832–845. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB078i005p00832 (1973).
doi: 10.1029/JB078i005p00832
Visage, S. et al. Evolution of the off-fault deformation of strike-slip faults in a sand-box experiment. Tectonophysics 847, 229704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2023.229704 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2023.229704
Barnhart, W. D. et al. Baluchistan, Pakistan earthquake. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 124, 6039–6055. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB017107(2019) . https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2018JB017107 (2013).

Auteurs

Floriane Provost (F)

Ecole et Observatoire des Sciences de la Terre (EOST), CNRS UAR 830, Université de Strasbourg, 5 rue René Descartes, 67084, Strasbourg, France. f.provost@unistra.fr.
Institut Terre et Environnement de Strasbourg (ITES), CNRS UMR 7063, Université de Strasbourg, 5 rue René Descartes, 67084, Strasbourg, France. f.provost@unistra.fr.

Volkan Karabacak (V)

Department of Geological Engineering, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, 26040, Eskisehir, Turkey.

Jean-Philippe Malet (JP)

Ecole et Observatoire des Sciences de la Terre (EOST), CNRS UAR 830, Université de Strasbourg, 5 rue René Descartes, 67084, Strasbourg, France.
Institut Terre et Environnement de Strasbourg (ITES), CNRS UMR 7063, Université de Strasbourg, 5 rue René Descartes, 67084, Strasbourg, France.

Jérôme Van der Woerd (J)

Ecole et Observatoire des Sciences de la Terre (EOST), CNRS UAR 830, Université de Strasbourg, 5 rue René Descartes, 67084, Strasbourg, France.
Institut Terre et Environnement de Strasbourg (ITES), CNRS UMR 7063, Université de Strasbourg, 5 rue René Descartes, 67084, Strasbourg, France.

Mustapha Meghraoui (M)

Ecole et Observatoire des Sciences de la Terre (EOST), CNRS UAR 830, Université de Strasbourg, 5 rue René Descartes, 67084, Strasbourg, France.
Institut Terre et Environnement de Strasbourg (ITES), CNRS UMR 7063, Université de Strasbourg, 5 rue René Descartes, 67084, Strasbourg, France.

Frédéric Masson (F)

Ecole et Observatoire des Sciences de la Terre (EOST), CNRS UAR 830, Université de Strasbourg, 5 rue René Descartes, 67084, Strasbourg, France.
Institut Terre et Environnement de Strasbourg (ITES), CNRS UMR 7063, Université de Strasbourg, 5 rue René Descartes, 67084, Strasbourg, France.

Matthieu Ferry (M)

Géosciences Montpellier, CNRS UMR 5243, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

David Michéa (D)

Ecole et Observatoire des Sciences de la Terre (EOST), CNRS UAR 830, Université de Strasbourg, 5 rue René Descartes, 67084, Strasbourg, France.

Elisabeth Pointal (E)

Data-Terra / Pôle de Données Terre Solide (ForM@Ter), CNRS, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, 1 rue Jussieu, 75005, Paris, France.

Classifications MeSH