Examining the association between men's gender equitable attitudes and contraceptive outcomes in rural Maharashtra, India.

Contraceptive communication Family planning Gender attitudes Gender-equitable men scale Male engagement

Journal

Dialogues in health
ISSN: 2772-6533
Titre abrégé: Dialogues Health
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9918506184906676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 04 07 2023
revised: 18 12 2023
accepted: 19 01 2024
medline: 22 3 2024
pubmed: 22 3 2024
entrez: 22 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Previous literature suggests that men reporting more gender-equitable attitudes are more likely to use condoms, but there is a paucity of data evaluating whether these attitudes are associated with contraceptive communication and use. The objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that men reporting more gender-equitable attitudes will be more likely to (a) engage in contraceptive communication with their wives and (b) that they and/or their wives will be more likely to use all forms of family planning, compared to men with less equitable attitudes. Using cross-sectional dyadic survey data from young married couples from rural Maharashtra, India ( Men with more gender-equitable attitudes were more likely to discuss family planning with their wives (AOR = 1·05, 95%CI 1·03-1·07, While gender-equitable attitudes among men may facilitate condom use and family planning communication in marriage, they do not appear to be linked with greater likelihood of use of more effective types of contraceptive use. This suggests that males supportive of gender equity may take greater responsibility for family planning vis a vis a less effective contraceptive, condoms, in the absence of more effective short-acting contraceptives for men. The National Institutes of Health [Grant number 5R01HD084453-01A1] and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA [grant number INV-002967].

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Previous literature suggests that men reporting more gender-equitable attitudes are more likely to use condoms, but there is a paucity of data evaluating whether these attitudes are associated with contraceptive communication and use. The objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that men reporting more gender-equitable attitudes will be more likely to (a) engage in contraceptive communication with their wives and (b) that they and/or their wives will be more likely to use all forms of family planning, compared to men with less equitable attitudes.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Using cross-sectional dyadic survey data from young married couples from rural Maharashtra, India (
Findings UNASSIGNED
Men with more gender-equitable attitudes were more likely to discuss family planning with their wives (AOR = 1·05, 95%CI 1·03-1·07,
Interpretation UNASSIGNED
While gender-equitable attitudes among men may facilitate condom use and family planning communication in marriage, they do not appear to be linked with greater likelihood of use of more effective types of contraceptive use. This suggests that males supportive of gender equity may take greater responsibility for family planning vis a vis a less effective contraceptive, condoms, in the absence of more effective short-acting contraceptives for men.
Funding UNASSIGNED
The National Institutes of Health [Grant number 5R01HD084453-01A1] and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA [grant number INV-002967].

Identifiants

pubmed: 38516219
doi: 10.1016/j.dialog.2024.100168
pii: S2772-6533(24)00004-2
pmc: PMC10953923
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

100168

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. CC BY 4.0.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Mohan Ghule (M)

Center on Gender Equity and Health, Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, USA.

Anvita Dixit (A)

Center on Gender Equity and Health, Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, USA.
Joint Doctoral Program in Public Health (Global Health track), University of California San Diego/San Diego State University, USA.

Nicole E Johns (NE)

Center on Gender Equity and Health, Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, USA.

Madhusudana Battala (M)

Population Council, New Delhi, India.

Shahina Begum (S)

ICMR-National Institute for Research in Reproductive and Child Health, Mumbai, India.

Sarah Averbach (S)

Center on Gender Equity and Health, Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, USA.
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, USA.

Jay G Silverman (JG)

Center on Gender Equity and Health, Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, USA.

Niranjan Saggurti (N)

Population Council, New Delhi, India.

Anita Raj (A)

Newcomb Institute, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA.

Classifications MeSH