Use of Inhaled Epoprostenol in Patients With COVID-19 Receiving Humidified, High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Is Associated With Progressive Respiratory Failure.

ARDS Acute respiratory distress syndrome COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 humidified high-flow nasal cannula inhaled epoprostenol inhaled pulmonary vasodilators

Journal

CHEST critical care
ISSN: 2949-7884
Titre abrégé: CHEST Crit Care
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9918681585806676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Historique:
medline: 22 3 2024
pubmed: 22 3 2024
entrez: 22 3 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The clinical benefit of using inhaled epoprostenol (iEpo) through a humidified high-flow nasal cannula (HHFNC) remains unknown for patients with COVID-19. Can iEpo prevent respiratory deterioration for patients with positive SARS-CoV-2 findings receiving HHFNC? This multicenter retrospective cohort analysis included patients aged 18 years or older with COVID-19 pneumonia who required HHFNC treatment. Patients who received iEpo were propensity score matched to patients who did not receive iEpo. The primary outcome was time to mechanical ventilation or death without mechanical ventilation and was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard ratios. The effects of residual confounding were assessed using a multilevel analysis, and a secondary analysis adjusted for outcome propensity also was performed in a multivariable model that included the entire (unmatched) patient cohort. Among 954 patients with positive SARS-CoV-2 findings receiving HHFNC therapy, 133 patients (13.9%) received iEpo. After propensity score matching, the median number of days until the composite outcome was similar between treatment groups (iEpo: 5.0 days [interquartile range, 2.0-10.0 days] vs no-iEpo: 6.5 days [interquartile range, 2.0-11.0 days]; In patients with COVID-19 receiving HHFNC therapy, use of iEpo was associated with the need for invasive mechanical ventilation.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The clinical benefit of using inhaled epoprostenol (iEpo) through a humidified high-flow nasal cannula (HHFNC) remains unknown for patients with COVID-19.
RESEARCH QUESTION OBJECTIVE
Can iEpo prevent respiratory deterioration for patients with positive SARS-CoV-2 findings receiving HHFNC?
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS METHODS
This multicenter retrospective cohort analysis included patients aged 18 years or older with COVID-19 pneumonia who required HHFNC treatment. Patients who received iEpo were propensity score matched to patients who did not receive iEpo. The primary outcome was time to mechanical ventilation or death without mechanical ventilation and was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard ratios. The effects of residual confounding were assessed using a multilevel analysis, and a secondary analysis adjusted for outcome propensity also was performed in a multivariable model that included the entire (unmatched) patient cohort.
RESULTS RESULTS
Among 954 patients with positive SARS-CoV-2 findings receiving HHFNC therapy, 133 patients (13.9%) received iEpo. After propensity score matching, the median number of days until the composite outcome was similar between treatment groups (iEpo: 5.0 days [interquartile range, 2.0-10.0 days] vs no-iEpo: 6.5 days [interquartile range, 2.0-11.0 days];
INTERPRETATION CONCLUSIONS
In patients with COVID-19 receiving HHFNC therapy, use of iEpo was associated with the need for invasive mechanical ventilation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38516615
doi: 10.1016/j.chstcc.2023.100019
pmc: PMC10956404
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Auteurs

Andrew P Michelson (AP)

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO.; Department of Medicine, the Institute for Informatics, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO.

Patrick G Lyons (PG)

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO.

Nguyet M Nguyen (NM)

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO.

Daniel Reynolds (D)

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO.

Rachel McDonald (R)

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO.

Colleen A McEvoy (CA)

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO.

Vladimir Despotovic (V)

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO.

Steven L Brody (SL)

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO.

Marin H Kollef (MH)

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO.

Bryan D Kraft (BD)

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO.

Classifications MeSH