The impact of age on outcome 2 years after traumatic brain injury: Case control study.

Age Independence Outcome Traumatic brain injury

Journal

Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine
ISSN: 1877-0665
Titre abrégé: Ann Phys Rehabil Med
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101502773

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 23 10 2022
revised: 07 02 2024
accepted: 10 02 2024
medline: 23 3 2024
pubmed: 23 3 2024
entrez: 22 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Age is associated with outcome after traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, there are mixed findings across outcome domains and most studies lack controls. This cross-sectional study examined the association between age group (15-24 years, 25-34 years, 35-44 years, 45-54 years, 55-64 years, and 65 years or more) and outcomes 2 years after TBI in independence in daily activities, driving, public transportation use, employment, leisure activities, social integration, relationships and emotional functioning, relative to healthy controls. It was hypothesized that older individuals with TBI would have significantly poorer outcomes than controls in all domains except anxiety and depression, for which it was expected they would show better outcomes. Global functional outcome (measured using the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended) was also examined, and we hypothesized that older adults would have poorer outcomes than younger adults. Participants were 1897 individuals with TBI (mean, SD age 36.7, 17.7 years) who completed measures 2 years post-injury and 110 healthy controls (age 38.3, 17.5 years). Compared to controls, individuals with TBI were less independent in most activities of daily living, participated less in leisure activities and employment, and were more socially isolated, anxious and depressed (p < 0.001). Those who were older in age were disproportionately less likely to be independent in light domestic activities, shopping and driving; and participated less in occupational activities relative to controls. Functional outcome was significantly higher in the youngest age group than in all older age groups (p < 0.001), but the younger groups were more likely to report being socially isolated (p < 0.001), depressed (p = 0.005) and anxious (p = 0.02), and less likely to be married or in a relationship (p < 0.001). A greater focus is needed on addressing psychosocial issues in younger individuals with TBI, whereas those who are older may require more intensive therapy to maximise independence in activities of daily living and return to employment.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Age is associated with outcome after traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, there are mixed findings across outcome domains and most studies lack controls.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
This cross-sectional study examined the association between age group (15-24 years, 25-34 years, 35-44 years, 45-54 years, 55-64 years, and 65 years or more) and outcomes 2 years after TBI in independence in daily activities, driving, public transportation use, employment, leisure activities, social integration, relationships and emotional functioning, relative to healthy controls. It was hypothesized that older individuals with TBI would have significantly poorer outcomes than controls in all domains except anxiety and depression, for which it was expected they would show better outcomes. Global functional outcome (measured using the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended) was also examined, and we hypothesized that older adults would have poorer outcomes than younger adults.
METHODS METHODS
Participants were 1897 individuals with TBI (mean, SD age 36.7, 17.7 years) who completed measures 2 years post-injury and 110 healthy controls (age 38.3, 17.5 years).
RESULTS RESULTS
Compared to controls, individuals with TBI were less independent in most activities of daily living, participated less in leisure activities and employment, and were more socially isolated, anxious and depressed (p < 0.001). Those who were older in age were disproportionately less likely to be independent in light domestic activities, shopping and driving; and participated less in occupational activities relative to controls. Functional outcome was significantly higher in the youngest age group than in all older age groups (p < 0.001), but the younger groups were more likely to report being socially isolated (p < 0.001), depressed (p = 0.005) and anxious (p = 0.02), and less likely to be married or in a relationship (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
A greater focus is needed on addressing psychosocial issues in younger individuals with TBI, whereas those who are older may require more intensive therapy to maximise independence in activities of daily living and return to employment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38518520
pii: S1877-0657(24)00018-6
doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2024.101834
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

101834

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest None.

Auteurs

Marina G Downing (MG)

Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Science, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Australia. Electronic address: Marina.Downing@monash.edu.

Meagan Carty (M)

Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Australia.

John Olver (J)

Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Michael Ponsford (M)

Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Australia.

Rose Acher (R)

Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Australia.

Dean Mckenzie (D)

Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Australia.

Jennie L Ponsford (JL)

Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Science, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Australia.

Classifications MeSH