Assessing inhaled corticosteroid adherence and responsiveness in severe asthma using beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol NEXThaler™ dose-counting and nitric oxide monitoring.

Adherence FeNO NEXThaler™ Severe asthma

Journal

The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice
ISSN: 2213-2201
Titre abrégé: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101597220

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 21 12 2023
revised: 21 02 2024
accepted: 13 03 2024
medline: 23 3 2024
pubmed: 23 3 2024
entrez: 22 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

65% of people with severe asthma and a FeNO ≥45 ppb are non-adherent to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). Digital devices recording both time-of-use and inhaler technique identify non-adherence and ICS responsiveness but are not widely available. As the NEXThaler™ dose counter only activates at an inspiratory flow of 35 L/min, this may provide an alternative to identifying ICS responsiveness. To assess ICS adherence and responsiveness in severe asthma using beclometasone/formoterol (200/6 mcg) NEXThaler™ (BFN) dose-counting. Severe asthmatics with a FeNO ≥45 ppb were invited to use BFN in place of their usual ICS/long-acting β2-agonist (LABA). FeNO, ACQ6, lung function and blood eosinophil count were monitored for 3 months. A log10ΔFeNO ≥0.24 was used to define FeNO suppression as the primary marker of ICS responsiveness at day 28. 27/48 (56%) patients demonstrated significant FeNO suppression at month 1 (median pre-114, post-48 ppb, p<0.001). A small but significant reduction occurred in FeNO non-suppressors. ACQ6 fell a median 1.2 units in FeNO suppressors (p<0.001) and 0.5 units in non-suppressors (p=0.025). These effects were sustained until month 3 in FeNO suppressors with a significant improvement in FEV1 and blood eosinophils. 67% (18/27) of those with baseline ICS/LABA prescription refills of ≥80% were FeNO suppressors suggesting prior non-adherence despite adequate prescription collection. 79% of FeNO suppressors did not require biologics within mean 11.4 months from initial dose counting. BFN dose counting identifies ICS responsiveness in severe asthma with the implication that these patients may not need to progress to biological therapies.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
65% of people with severe asthma and a FeNO ≥45 ppb are non-adherent to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). Digital devices recording both time-of-use and inhaler technique identify non-adherence and ICS responsiveness but are not widely available. As the NEXThaler™ dose counter only activates at an inspiratory flow of 35 L/min, this may provide an alternative to identifying ICS responsiveness.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To assess ICS adherence and responsiveness in severe asthma using beclometasone/formoterol (200/6 mcg) NEXThaler™ (BFN) dose-counting.
METHODS METHODS
Severe asthmatics with a FeNO ≥45 ppb were invited to use BFN in place of their usual ICS/long-acting β2-agonist (LABA). FeNO, ACQ6, lung function and blood eosinophil count were monitored for 3 months. A log10ΔFeNO ≥0.24 was used to define FeNO suppression as the primary marker of ICS responsiveness at day 28.
RESULTS RESULTS
27/48 (56%) patients demonstrated significant FeNO suppression at month 1 (median pre-114, post-48 ppb, p<0.001). A small but significant reduction occurred in FeNO non-suppressors. ACQ6 fell a median 1.2 units in FeNO suppressors (p<0.001) and 0.5 units in non-suppressors (p=0.025). These effects were sustained until month 3 in FeNO suppressors with a significant improvement in FEV1 and blood eosinophils. 67% (18/27) of those with baseline ICS/LABA prescription refills of ≥80% were FeNO suppressors suggesting prior non-adherence despite adequate prescription collection. 79% of FeNO suppressors did not require biologics within mean 11.4 months from initial dose counting.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
BFN dose counting identifies ICS responsiveness in severe asthma with the implication that these patients may not need to progress to biological therapies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38518866
pii: S2213-2198(24)00288-5
doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.03.026
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Hnin Ww Aung (HW)

Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester. Institute for Lung Health, NIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester United Kingdom; Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester United Kingdom.

Claire E Boddy (CE)

Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester United Kingdom.

Eleanor Hampson (E)

Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester United Kingdom.

Mark Bell (M)

Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester United Kingdom.

Lauren A Parnell (LA)

Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester United Kingdom.

Kumaran Balasundaram (K)

Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester United Kingdom.

Anna C Murphy (AC)

Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester United Kingdom.

Shamsa Naveed (S)

Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester. Institute for Lung Health, NIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester United Kingdom; Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester United Kingdom.

Peter Bradding (P)

Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester. Institute for Lung Health, NIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester United Kingdom; Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester United Kingdom. Electronic address: pb46@le.ac.uk.

Classifications MeSH