Flatfoot arch correction with generic 3D-printed orthoses at different body weight percentages.
3D printing
Arch collapse
Arch height
Flatfoot
Medial arch angle
Orthosis
Weightbearing
Journal
Foot (Edinburgh, Scotland)
ISSN: 1532-2963
Titre abrégé: Foot (Edinb)
Pays: Scotland
ID NLM: 9109564
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Mar 2024
18 Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
12
09
2023
revised:
14
03
2024
accepted:
16
03
2024
medline:
24
3
2024
pubmed:
24
3
2024
entrez:
23
3
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Flatfoot can be associated with foot pathologies and treated conservatively with foot orthoses to correct arch collapse and alleviate painful symptoms. Recently, 3D printing has become more popular and is widely used for medical device manufacturing, such as orthoses. This study aims at quantifying the effect of generic 3D-printed foot orthoses on flatfoot arch correction under different static loading conditions. Participants with normal and flatfeet were recruited for this cross-sectional study. Clinical evaluation included arch height, foot posture index, and Beighton flexibility score. Surface imaging was performed in different loading conditions: 1) 0% when sitting, 2) 50% when standing on both feet, and 3) 125% when standing on one foot with a weighted vest. For flatfoot participants, three configurations were tested: without an orthosis, with a soft generic 3D printed orthosis, and with a rigid 3D printed orthosis. Arch heights and medial arch angles were calculated and compared for the different loading conditions and with or without orthoses. The differences between groups, with and without orthoses, were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis tests, and a p < 0.05 was considered significant. A total of 10 normal feet and 10 flatfeet were analyzed. The 3D printed orthosis significantly increased arch height in all loading conditions, compared to flatfeet without orthosis. Wearing an orthosis reduced the medial arch angle, although not significantly. Our technique was found to have good to excellent intra and interclass correlation coefficients. Generic 3D printed orthoses corrected arch collapse in static loading conditions, including 125% body weight to simulate functional tasks like walking. Our protocol was found to be reliable and easier to implement in a clinical setting compared to previously reported methods. II.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Flatfoot can be associated with foot pathologies and treated conservatively with foot orthoses to correct arch collapse and alleviate painful symptoms. Recently, 3D printing has become more popular and is widely used for medical device manufacturing, such as orthoses. This study aims at quantifying the effect of generic 3D-printed foot orthoses on flatfoot arch correction under different static loading conditions.
METHODS
METHODS
Participants with normal and flatfeet were recruited for this cross-sectional study. Clinical evaluation included arch height, foot posture index, and Beighton flexibility score. Surface imaging was performed in different loading conditions: 1) 0% when sitting, 2) 50% when standing on both feet, and 3) 125% when standing on one foot with a weighted vest. For flatfoot participants, three configurations were tested: without an orthosis, with a soft generic 3D printed orthosis, and with a rigid 3D printed orthosis. Arch heights and medial arch angles were calculated and compared for the different loading conditions and with or without orthoses. The differences between groups, with and without orthoses, were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis tests, and a p < 0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 10 normal feet and 10 flatfeet were analyzed. The 3D printed orthosis significantly increased arch height in all loading conditions, compared to flatfeet without orthosis. Wearing an orthosis reduced the medial arch angle, although not significantly. Our technique was found to have good to excellent intra and interclass correlation coefficients.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Generic 3D printed orthoses corrected arch collapse in static loading conditions, including 125% body weight to simulate functional tasks like walking. Our protocol was found to be reliable and easier to implement in a clinical setting compared to previously reported methods.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
METHODS
II.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38520781
pii: S0958-2592(24)00026-9
doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2024.102093
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
102093Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest Marie-Lyne Nault: The institution (Hopital Sacré-Coeur de Montréal) has received departmental funding for research and educational purposes from: Arthrex, Conmed, Depuy, Linvatec, Smith & Nephew, Stryker, Synthes, Tornier, Wright, Zimmer Biomet. Departmental funding was also provided to CHU Sainte-Justine from Orthopaediatrics. This project did not receive any funding from these entities and they were not involved in any aspect of the submitted work. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.