Laying the foundations for implementing Magnet principles in hospitals in Europe: A qualitative analysis.

Hospitals Leadership Magnet4Europe Organisational innovation Professional Qualitative study Workforce

Journal

International journal of nursing studies
ISSN: 1873-491X
Titre abrégé: Int J Nurs Stud
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0400675

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 04 10 2023
revised: 04 03 2024
accepted: 08 03 2024
medline: 25 3 2024
pubmed: 25 3 2024
entrez: 24 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Magnet hospitals, a concept developed in the U.S., have been associated with improved nurse recruitment and retention, and better patient outcomes. Magnet principles may be useful to address workforce challenges in European hospitals, but they have not been implemented or evaluated on a large scale in the European hospital context. This study aims to explore the initial phase of implementing Magnet principles in 11 acute care hospitals in six European countries. The specific objectives of the study were to investigate the type of work that characterises the early phase of implementation and how implementation leaders engage with their context. A multinational qualitative study was conducted, with data from 23 semi-structured, one-to-one interviews with implementation leaders in 11 acute care hospitals in six European countries. Thematic analyses guided the analysis of data. Three themes of core work processes during the early phase of implementing Magnet principles in European hospitals were identified. The first theme, 'Creating space for Magnet', describes how work was directed towards creating both political and organisational space for the project. The second theme, 'Framing to fit: understanding and interpreting Magnet principles', describes the translational work to understand what the Magnet model entails and how it relates to the local hospital context. Finally, the third theme, 'Calibrating speed and dose', describes the strategic work of considering internal and external factors to adjust the process of implementation. The first phase of implementation was characterised by conceptual and relational work; translating the Magnet concepts, considering the fit into existing structures and practices and making space for Magnet in the local context. Understanding the local context played an important role in shaping and guiding the navigation of professional and organisational tensions. Hospitals employed diverse strategies to either emphasise or downplay the role of nurses and nursing to facilitate progress in the implementation.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Magnet hospitals, a concept developed in the U.S., have been associated with improved nurse recruitment and retention, and better patient outcomes. Magnet principles may be useful to address workforce challenges in European hospitals, but they have not been implemented or evaluated on a large scale in the European hospital context.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This study aims to explore the initial phase of implementing Magnet principles in 11 acute care hospitals in six European countries. The specific objectives of the study were to investigate the type of work that characterises the early phase of implementation and how implementation leaders engage with their context.
METHODS METHODS
A multinational qualitative study was conducted, with data from 23 semi-structured, one-to-one interviews with implementation leaders in 11 acute care hospitals in six European countries. Thematic analyses guided the analysis of data.
FINDINGS RESULTS
Three themes of core work processes during the early phase of implementing Magnet principles in European hospitals were identified. The first theme, 'Creating space for Magnet', describes how work was directed towards creating both political and organisational space for the project. The second theme, 'Framing to fit: understanding and interpreting Magnet principles', describes the translational work to understand what the Magnet model entails and how it relates to the local hospital context. Finally, the third theme, 'Calibrating speed and dose', describes the strategic work of considering internal and external factors to adjust the process of implementation.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The first phase of implementation was characterised by conceptual and relational work; translating the Magnet concepts, considering the fit into existing structures and practices and making space for Magnet in the local context. Understanding the local context played an important role in shaping and guiding the navigation of professional and organisational tensions. Hospitals employed diverse strategies to either emphasise or downplay the role of nurses and nursing to facilitate progress in the implementation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38522183
pii: S0020-7489(24)00066-X
doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104754
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

104754

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Ingrid Svensson (I)

Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address: ingrid.svensson.2@ki.se.

Jackie Bridges (J)

School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.

Jaimie Ellis (J)

School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom.

Noeleen Brady (N)

School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

Simon Dello (S)

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.

Jonathan Hooft (J)

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.

Joan Kleine (J)

Department of Healthcare Management, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Dorothea Kohnen (D)

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium; Occupational & Organisational Psychology and Professional Learning, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium.

Elaine Lehane (E)

School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

Rikard Lindqvist (R)

Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Claudia B Maier (CB)

Department of Healthcare Management, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Vera J C Mc Carthy (VJC)

School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

Ingeborg Strømseng Sjetne (I)

Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway; Lovisenberg Diakonale Sykehus, Oslo, Norway.

Lars E Eriksson (LE)

Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom; Medical Unit Infectious Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden.

Lisa Smeds Alenius (L)

Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Classifications MeSH