Lepocreadiidae (Trematoda) associated with gelatinous zooplankton (Cnidaria and Ctenophora) and fishes in Australian and Japanese waters.

Cnidaria Ctenophora Lepocreadiidae Life cycle Taxonomy Trematoda

Journal

Parasitology international
ISSN: 1873-0329
Titre abrégé: Parasitol Int
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9708549

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 07 12 2023
revised: 21 03 2024
accepted: 21 03 2024
medline: 25 3 2024
pubmed: 25 3 2024
entrez: 24 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

We examined gelatinous zooplankton from off eastern Australia for lepocreadiid trematode metacercariae. From 221 specimens of 17 species of cnidarian medusae and 218 specimens of four species of ctenophores, infections were found in seven cnidarian and two ctenophore species. Metacercariae were distinguished using cox1 mtDNA, ITS2 rDNA and morphology. We identified three species of Prodistomum Linton, 1910 [P. keyam Bray & Cribb, 1996, P. orientale (Layman, 1930), and Prodistomum Type 3], two species of Opechona Looss, 1907 [O. kahawai Bray & Cribb, 2003 and O. cf. olssoni], and Cephalolepidapedon saba Yamaguti, 1970. Two species were found in cnidarians and ctenophores, three only in cnidarians, and one only in a ctenophore. Three Australian fishes were identified as definitive hosts; four species were collected from Scomber australasicus and one each from Arripis trutta and Monodactylus argenteus. Transmission of trematodes to these fishes by ingestion of gelatinous zooplankton is plausible given their mid-water feeding habits, although such predation is rarely reported. Combined morphological and molecular analyses of adult trematodes identified two cox1 types for C. saba, three cox1 types and species of Opechona, and six cox1 types and five species of Prodistomum of which only two are identified to species. All three genera are widely distributed geographically and have unresolved taxonomic issues. Levels of distinction between the recognised species varied dramatically for morphology, the three molecular markers, and host distribution. Phylogenetic analysis of 28S rDNA data extends previous findings that species of Opechona and Prodistomum do not form monophyletic clades.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38522781
pii: S1383-5769(24)00041-2
doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2024.102890
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

102890

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Auteurs

Thomas H Cribb (TH)

School of the Environment, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia; Queensland Museum, Biodiversity and Geosciences Program, South Brisbane, Queensland 4101, Australia. Electronic address: T.cribb@uq.edu.au.

Scott C Cutmore (SC)

Queensland Museum, Biodiversity and Geosciences Program, South Brisbane, Queensland 4101, Australia.

Nicholas Q-X Wee (NQ)

Queensland Museum, Biodiversity and Geosciences Program, South Brisbane, Queensland 4101, Australia.

Joanna G Browne (JG)

School of Environment and Science and Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Gold Coast, Queensland 4222, Australia; Museums Victoria, GPO Box 666, Melbourne, Victoria 3001, Australia.

Pablo Diaz Morales (PD)

Sea Jellies Illuminated, Sea World, Main Beach, QLD 4217, Australia.

Kylie A Pitt (KA)

School of Environment and Science and Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Gold Coast, Queensland 4222, Australia.

Classifications MeSH