Artificial intelligence in sport: Exploring the potential of using ChatGPT in resistance training prescription.
Chatbot
Exercise prescription
Individualised training
Periodisation
Programming
Strength training
Journal
Biology of sport
ISSN: 0860-021X
Titre abrégé: Biol Sport
Pays: Poland
ID NLM: 8700872
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2024
Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
13
09
2023
revised:
22
10
2023
accepted:
28
10
2023
medline:
25
3
2024
pubmed:
25
3
2024
entrez:
25
3
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
OpenAI's Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) technology enables conversational interactions with applications across various fields, including sport. Here, ChatGPT's proficiency in designing a 12-week resistance training programme, following specific prompts, was investigated. GPT3.5 and GPT4.0 versions were requested to design 12-week resistance training programmes for male and female hypothetical subjects (20-years-old, no injury, and 'intermediate' resistance training experience). Subsequently, GPT4.0 was requested to design an 'advanced' training programme for the same profiles. The proposed training programmes were compared with established guidelines and literature (e.g., National Strength and Conditioning Association textbook), and discussed. ChatGPT suggested 12-week training programmes comprising three, 4-week phases, each with different objectives (e.g., hypertrophy/strength). GPT3.5 proposed a weekly frequency of ~3 sessions, load intensity of 70-85% of one repetition-maximum, repetition range of 4-8 (2-4 sets), and tempo of 2/0/2 (eccentric/pause/concentric/'pause'). GPT4.0 proposed intermediate- and advanced programme, with a frequency of 5 or 4 sessions, 60-90% or 70-95% intensity, 3-5 sets or 3-6 sets, 5-12 or 3-12 repetitions, respectively. GPT3.5 proposed rest intervals of 90-120 s, and exercise tempo of 2/0/2. GPT4.0 proposed 60-180 (intermediate) or 60-300 s (advanced), with exercise tempo of 2/1/2 for intermediates, and 3/0/1/0, 2/0/1/0, and 1/0/1/0 for advanced programmes. All derived programmes were objectively similar regardless of sex. ChatGPT generated training programmes which likely require additional fine-tuning before application. GPT4.0 synthesised more information than GPT3.5 in response to the prompt, and demonstrated recognition awareness of training experience (intermediate vs advanced). ChatGPT may serve as a complementary tool for writing 'draft' programme, but likely requires human expertise to maximise training programme effectiveness.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38524820
doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2024.132987
pii: 51817
pmc: PMC10955742
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
209-220Informations de copyright
Copyright © Biology of Sport 2024.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.