Effect of preoperative chlorhexidine, essential oil, and cetylpyridinium chloride mouthwashes on bacterial contamination during dental implant surgery: A randomized controlled clinical trial.

Bacteria count Cetylpyridinium chloride Chlorhexidine Dental implant placement Essential oil Mouthwash

Journal

The Saudi dental journal
ISSN: 1013-9052
Titre abrégé: Saudi Dent J
Pays: Saudi Arabia
ID NLM: 9313603

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 26 08 2023
revised: 23 12 2023
accepted: 25 12 2023
medline: 25 3 2024
pubmed: 25 3 2024
entrez: 25 3 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Although the role of chlorhexidine and other mouthwashes in periodontal therapy has been elucidated, little information is available on their use as routine preoperative mouth rinses before surgery, especially in periodontal procedures such as dental implant surgery. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of preoperative chlorhexidine, essential oil, and cetylpyridinium chloride mouthwashes in reducing bacterial contamination at the time of implant placement. Eligible patients who underwent dental implant surgery were randomly divided into four groups based on the mouthwash used: (1) 0.12 % chlorhexidine, (2) essential oil, (3) cetylpyridinium chloride, and (4) saline (served as the control group). All the patients of each group rinsed preoperatively with 15 mL of the respective mouthwash for 60 s. Saliva samples before (pre) and immediately after rinsing with the mouthwash (post) and after suturing the flap (end) were collected on the day of the implant placement. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was performed to analyze the samples and quantify the targeted periodontal pathogens using a propidium monoazide (PMA) dye. Forty patients were included in the study. Real-time qPCR demonstrated a significant reduction in the number of pathogens in the saliva samples of the mouthwash groups compared to that of the control group. A statistically significant difference was observed between the groups for the pre-post and pre-end samples ( Preoperative chlorhexidine, essential oil, and cetylpyridinium chloride mouthwashes can reduce the bacterial load at the time of implant placement, thereby reducing the incidence of implant-related complications.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Although the role of chlorhexidine and other mouthwashes in periodontal therapy has been elucidated, little information is available on their use as routine preoperative mouth rinses before surgery, especially in periodontal procedures such as dental implant surgery.
Objective UNASSIGNED
This study aimed to compare the efficacy of preoperative chlorhexidine, essential oil, and cetylpyridinium chloride mouthwashes in reducing bacterial contamination at the time of implant placement.
Materials and Methods UNASSIGNED
Eligible patients who underwent dental implant surgery were randomly divided into four groups based on the mouthwash used: (1) 0.12 % chlorhexidine, (2) essential oil, (3) cetylpyridinium chloride, and (4) saline (served as the control group). All the patients of each group rinsed preoperatively with 15 mL of the respective mouthwash for 60 s. Saliva samples before (pre) and immediately after rinsing with the mouthwash (post) and after suturing the flap (end) were collected on the day of the implant placement. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was performed to analyze the samples and quantify the targeted periodontal pathogens using a propidium monoazide (PMA) dye.
Results UNASSIGNED
Forty patients were included in the study. Real-time qPCR demonstrated a significant reduction in the number of pathogens in the saliva samples of the mouthwash groups compared to that of the control group. A statistically significant difference was observed between the groups for the pre-post and pre-end samples (
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
Preoperative chlorhexidine, essential oil, and cetylpyridinium chloride mouthwashes can reduce the bacterial load at the time of implant placement, thereby reducing the incidence of implant-related complications.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38525187
doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.12.011
pii: S1013-9052(23)00275-4
pmc: PMC10960146
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

492-497

Informations de copyright

© 2023 THE AUTHORS.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Wael Yaghmoor (W)

Department of Basic and Clinical Oral Sciences, College of Dental Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Periodontology, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

Montserrat Ruiz-Torruella (M)

Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, the Forsyth Institute, Boston, MA, USA.

Yumi Ogata (Y)

Department of Periodontology, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

Zuhair S Natto (ZS)

Department of Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Matthew Finkelman (M)

Department of Public Health and Community Service, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

Toshi Kawai (T)

Department of Oral Science and Translation Research, College of Dental Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.

Yong Hur (Y)

Department of Periodontology, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

Classifications MeSH