Trends in Medicare Submitted Charges to Allowed Payment Ratios for Ophthalmology Services.

allowed medicare payments billing medicare excess charge ophthalmology services trends

Journal

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)
ISSN: 1177-5467
Titre abrégé: Clin Ophthalmol
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101321512

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 24 08 2023
accepted: 21 11 2023
medline: 25 3 2024
pubmed: 25 3 2024
entrez: 25 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Many physicians charge more than the Medicare insurance program pays. Current charge-to-payment ratios in ophthalmology and trends over the years are unknown. In this work, we examined physician charge-to-payment ratios in ophthalmology across procedures and consultations. We utilized data from 100% final-action physician/supplier Part B Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) population from 2015 to 2020. We retrieved data on ophthalmic procedures and consultations, both facility-based and non-facility-based, conducted by ≥ 50 ophthalmologists. We analyzed median charge-to-payment ratios, which were calculated as submitted charges divided by the Medicare-allowed payments, between ophthalmic procedures and consultations to assess for trends over the study period. We find that the median charge-to-payment ratio for all current procedural terminology (CPT) codes in 2020 was 2.23 (Interquartile range (IQR): 1.54-3.27) as compared to 2.00 (IQR: 1.39-2.92) in 2015, an overall 2.76% average annual growth rate from 2015-2020. For ophthalmic procedures, the median charge-to-payment ratio in 2020 was 3.03 (IQR: 2.13-4.41) compared to 2.79 (IQR: 1.96-3.97) in 2015, corresponding to a 2.01% AAGR from 2015-2020. For consultations, those rates were 2.06 (IQR: 1.48-2.96), 1.85 (IQR: 1.33-2.59), and 2.71%, respectively. We found that the submitted charge-to-Medicare payment ratios among ophthalmic procedures and consultations have steadily increased since 2015. However, there was a relatively low rate of excess charges for ophthalmology services compared to other surgical-based specialties with minimal variation among providers.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38525383
doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S436918
pii: 436918
pmc: PMC10959116
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

859-863

Informations de copyright

© 2024 Elhusseiny et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Auteurs

Abdelrahman M Elhusseiny (AM)

Department of Ophthalmology, Harvey and Bernice Jones Eye Institute, the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Department of Ophthalmology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Muhammad Z Chauhan (MZ)

Department of Ophthalmology, Harvey and Bernice Jones Eye Institute, the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.

Ahmed B Sallam (AB)

Department of Ophthalmology, Harvey and Bernice Jones Eye Institute, the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Department of Ophthalmology, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

Classifications MeSH