How BRCA and homologous recombination deficiency change therapeutic strategies in ovarian cancer: a review of literature.
BRCA protein
BRCAness
HRD testing
PARP inhibitors
homologous recombination deficiency
ovarian cancer
overall survival
Journal
Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
received:
08
11
2023
accepted:
09
01
2024
medline:
25
3
2024
pubmed:
25
3
2024
entrez:
25
3
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
About 50% of High Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer exhibit a high degree of genomic instability due to mutation of genes involved in Homologous Recombination (HRD) and such defect accounts for synthetic lethality mechanism of PARP inhibitors (PARP-i). Several clinical trials have shown how BRCA and HRD mutational status profoundly affect first line chemotherapy as well as response to maintenance therapy with PARP-i, hence Progression Free Survival and Overall Survival. Consequently, there is urgent need for the development of increasingly reliable HRD tests, overcoming present limitations, as they play a key role in the diagnostic and therapeutic process as well as have a prognostic and predictive value. In this review we offer an overview of the state of the art regarding the actual knowledge about BRCA and HRD mutational status, the rationale of PARPi use and HRD testing (current and in development assays) and their implications in clinical practice and in the treatment decision process, in order to optimize and choose the best tailored therapy in patients with ovarian cancer.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38525421
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1335196
pmc: PMC10957789
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
1335196Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Arcieri, Tius, Andreetta, Restaino, Biasioli, Poletto, Damante, Ercoli, Driul, Fagotti, Lorusso, Scambia and Vizzielli.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.