MAN vs MACHINE: PROVIDER DIRECTED vs PRECISION AUTOMATED CRITICAL CARE MANAGEMENT (PACC-MAN) IN A PORCINE MODEL OF DISTRIBUTIVE SHOCK.


Journal

Shock (Augusta, Ga.)
ISSN: 1540-0514
Titre abrégé: Shock
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9421564

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 Mar 2024
Historique:
medline: 25 3 2024
pubmed: 25 3 2024
entrez: 25 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Critical care management of shock is a labor-intensive process. Precision automated critical care management (PACC-MAN) is an automated closed-loop system incorporating physiologic and hemodynamic inputs to deliver interventions while avoiding excessive fluid or vasopressor administration. To understand PACC-MAN efficacy, we compared PACC-MAN to provider-directed management (PDM). We hypothesized that PACC-MAN would achieve equivalent resuscitation outcomes to PDM while maintaining normotension with lower fluid and vasopressor requirements. Twelve swine underwent 30% controlled hemorrhage over 30 minutes, followed by 45 minutes of aortic occlusion to generate a vasoplegic shock state, transfusion to euvolemia, and randomization to PACC-MAN or PDM for 4.25 hours. Primary outcomes were total crystalloid volume, vasopressor administration, total time spent at hypotension (MAP <60 mmHg), and total number of interventions. Weight-based fluid volumes were similar between PACC-MAN and PDM, median and IQR are reported (73.1 mL/kg [59.0-78.7] vs. 87.1 mL/kg [79.4-91.8] p = 0.07). There was no statistical difference in cumulative norepinephrine (PACC-MAN: 33.4 mcg/kg [27.1-44.6] vs. PDM: 7.5 [3.3-24.2] mcg/kg, p = 0.09). The median percentage of time spent at hypotension was equivalent (PACC-MAN: 6.2% [3.6-7.4] and PDM: 3.1% [1.3-6.6], p = 0.23). Urine outputs were similar between PACC-MAN and PDM (14.0 mL/kg vs. 21.5 mL/kg, p = 0.13). Automated resuscitation achieves equivalent resuscitation outcomes to direct human intervention in this shock model. This study provides the first translational experience with the PACC-MAN system versus PDM.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Critical care management of shock is a labor-intensive process. Precision automated critical care management (PACC-MAN) is an automated closed-loop system incorporating physiologic and hemodynamic inputs to deliver interventions while avoiding excessive fluid or vasopressor administration. To understand PACC-MAN efficacy, we compared PACC-MAN to provider-directed management (PDM). We hypothesized that PACC-MAN would achieve equivalent resuscitation outcomes to PDM while maintaining normotension with lower fluid and vasopressor requirements.
METHODS METHODS
Twelve swine underwent 30% controlled hemorrhage over 30 minutes, followed by 45 minutes of aortic occlusion to generate a vasoplegic shock state, transfusion to euvolemia, and randomization to PACC-MAN or PDM for 4.25 hours. Primary outcomes were total crystalloid volume, vasopressor administration, total time spent at hypotension (MAP <60 mmHg), and total number of interventions.
RESULTS RESULTS
Weight-based fluid volumes were similar between PACC-MAN and PDM, median and IQR are reported (73.1 mL/kg [59.0-78.7] vs. 87.1 mL/kg [79.4-91.8] p = 0.07). There was no statistical difference in cumulative norepinephrine (PACC-MAN: 33.4 mcg/kg [27.1-44.6] vs. PDM: 7.5 [3.3-24.2] mcg/kg, p = 0.09). The median percentage of time spent at hypotension was equivalent (PACC-MAN: 6.2% [3.6-7.4] and PDM: 3.1% [1.3-6.6], p = 0.23). Urine outputs were similar between PACC-MAN and PDM (14.0 mL/kg vs. 21.5 mL/kg, p = 0.13).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Automated resuscitation achieves equivalent resuscitation outcomes to direct human intervention in this shock model. This study provides the first translational experience with the PACC-MAN system versus PDM.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38526148
doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000002345
pii: 00024382-990000000-00409
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Shock Society.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest: AJ, LPN, and TKW are co-founders and shareholders of Certus Critical Care, Incorporated. All other authors: No conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Gloria D Sanin (GD)

Department of General Surgery, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

Gabriel E Cambronero (GE)

Department of General Surgery, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

Elizabeth C Wood (EC)

Department of General Surgery, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

James W Patterson (JW)

Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

Magan R Lane (MR)

Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

Antonio C Renaldo (AC)

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA.

Bonnie E Laingen (BE)

Department of General Surgery, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

Elaheh Rahbar (E)

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA.

Jason Y Adams (JY)

Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.

Austin Johnson (A)

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Lucas P Neff (LP)

Department of General Surgery, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

Timothy K Williams (TK)

Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

Classifications MeSH