Differential prognostic values of the three AKT isoforms in acute myeloid leukemia.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 24 11 2023
accepted: 19 03 2024
medline: 26 3 2024
pubmed: 26 3 2024
entrez: 26 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway lies at the confluence of signaling pathways in which various components are subjected to activating genetic alterations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), thus contributing to oncogenesis. Three AKT isoforms exist in humans. However, whether one isoform predominates in AML remains unknown. This study reveals that AKT3 behaves very distinctly than AKT1 or AKT2 in both normal myeloid differentiation and AML. During normal differentiation, AKT3 is preferentially expressed in hematopoietic stem cells whilst AKT1 becomes preferentially expressed as cells differentiate into granulocytes or monocytes. AKT2 expression remains unchanged. In AML, AKT3 expression varies widely among patient samples and is counterintuitively high in mature/monocytic leukemia. Furthermore, a low level of AKT3 expression is strongly correlated to genetic alterations associated with a better outcome (NPM1 mutations and RUNX1-RUNX1T1 translocation), while a high level is correlated to alterations associated to a bad outcome (RUNX1 mutations; and SRSF2, U2AF1, SF3B1, ASXL1 and BCOR mutations occurring frequently in MDS and MPN). Consistently, a high AKT3 expression level appears as a very strong predictor of poor survival. Curiously, although modestly varying among AML samples, a high AKT1 expression shows in contrast as a strong predictor of a better patient outcome. These data suggest that AKT3 and AKT1 expressions have strong, yet opposite, prognostic values.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38528080
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57578-x
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-57578-x
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

7070

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Döhner, H. et al. Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel. Blood. 129(4), 424–447 (2017).
doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-08-733196 pubmed: 27895058 pmcid: 5291965
Döhner, H. et al. Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2022 recommendations from an international expert panel on behalf of the ELN. Blood. 140(12), 1345–1377 (2022).
doi: 10.1182/blood.2022016867 pubmed: 35797463
Faridi, J., Fawcett, J., Wang, L. & Roth, R. A. Akt promotes increased mammalian cell size by stimulating protein synthesis and inhibiting protein degradation. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 285(5), E964–E972 (2003).
doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00239.2003 pubmed: 12876075
Smit, D. J. & Jücker, M. AKT Isoforms as a Target in Cancer and Immunotherapy. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 436, 409–436 (2022).
pubmed: 36243855
Masure, S. et al. Molecular cloning, expression and characterization of the human serine/threonine kinase Akt-3. Eur. J. Biochem. 265, 353–360 (1999).
doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1999.00774.x pubmed: 10491192
Degan, S. E. & Gelman, I. H. Emerging roles for AKT isoform preference in cancer progression pathways. Mol. Cancer Res. 19(8), 1251–1257 (2021).
doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-20-1066 pubmed: 33931488 pmcid: 8349788
Wainstein, E., Maik-Rachline, G., Blenis, J. & Seger, R. AKTs do not translocate to the nucleus upon stimulation but AKT3 can constitutively signal from the nuclear envelope. Cell Rep. 41(10), 111733 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111733 pubmed: 36476861
Mure, H. et al. Akt2 and Akt3 play a pivotal role in malignant gliomas. Neuro Oncol. 12(3), 221–232 (2010).
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nop026 pubmed: 20167810
Bagger, F. O. et al. BloodSpot: a database of gene expression profiles and transcriptional programs for healthy and malignant haematopoiesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 44(D1), D917–D924 (2016).
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1101 pubmed: 26507857
De Clara, E. et al. Long non-coding RNA expression profile in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia identifies a distinct signature and a new biomarker in NPM1-mutated patients. Haematologica. 102(10), 1718–1726 (2017).
doi: 10.3324/haematol.2017.171645 pubmed: 28679652 pmcid: 5622856
Tyner, J. W. et al. Functional genomic landscape of acute myeloid leukaemia. Nature. 562(7728), 526–531 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0623-z pubmed: 30333627 pmcid: 6280667
Zeng, A. G. X. et al. A cellular hierarchy framework for understanding heterogeneity and predicting drug response in acute myeloid leukemia. Nat. Med. 28(6), 1212–1223 (2022).
doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01819-x pubmed: 35618837
Phung, T. L. et al. Akt1 and akt3 exert opposing roles in the regulation of vascular tumor growth. Cancer Res. 75(1), 40–50 (2015).
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2961 pubmed: 25388284
Ren, Z. et al. Opposing effects of NPM1wt and NPM1c mutants on AKT signaling in AML. Leukemia. 34(4), 1172–1176 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41375-019-0621-7 pubmed: 31728055
Xiao, C. et al. RUNX1 targeting AKT3 promotes alveolar hypercoagulation and fibrinolytic inhibition in LPS induced ARDS. Respir. Res. 25(1), 54 (2024).
doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-02689-2 pubmed: 38267920 pmcid: 10809548
Wang, L. et al. Regulation of AKT signaling by Id1 controls t(8;21) leukemia initiation and progression. Blood. 126(5), 640–650 (2015).
doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-03-635532 pubmed: 26084673 pmcid: 4520879
Trapnell, C. et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat. Protoc. 7(3), 562–578 (2012).
doi: 10.1038/nprot.2012.016 pubmed: 22383036 pmcid: 3334321

Auteurs

Eulalie Corre (E)

Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse (CRCT), INSERM UMR-1037, CNRS UMR-5071, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.

Cécile Soum (C)

Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse (CRCT), INSERM UMR-1037, CNRS UMR-5071, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.

Romain Pfeifer (R)

Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse (CRCT), INSERM UMR-1037, CNRS UMR-5071, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.

Chloé Bessière (C)

Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse (CRCT), INSERM UMR-1037, CNRS UMR-5071, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.

Sandra Dailhau (S)

Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse (CRCT), INSERM UMR-1037, CNRS UMR-5071, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.

Catherine Marbœuf (C)

Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse (CRCT), INSERM UMR-1037, CNRS UMR-5071, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.

Fabienne Meggetto (F)

Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse (CRCT), INSERM UMR-1037, CNRS UMR-5071, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.

Christian Touriol (C)

Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse (CRCT), INSERM UMR-1037, CNRS UMR-5071, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.

Christian Récher (C)

Service d'Hématologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopôle, Toulouse, France.

Marina Bousquet (M)

Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse (CRCT), INSERM UMR-1037, CNRS UMR-5071, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.

Stéphane Pyronnet (S)

Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse (CRCT), INSERM UMR-1037, CNRS UMR-5071, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France. stephane.pyronnet@inserm.fr.

Classifications MeSH