Long-term treatment with lasmiditan in patients with migraine: post hoc analysis of treatment patterns and outcomes from the open-label extension of the CENTURION randomized trial.

Acute treatment Lasmiditan Migraine Open-label

Journal

The journal of headache and pain
ISSN: 1129-2377
Titre abrégé: J Headache Pain
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100940562

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 19 12 2023
accepted: 05 03 2024
medline: 26 3 2024
pubmed: 26 3 2024
entrez: 26 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The objective of this analysis was to gain new insights into the patient characteristics and other factors associated with lasmiditan usage and clinical outcomes under conditions resembling the real-world setting. This was a post hoc analysis of data from the 12-month, open-label extension (OLE) of the phase 3, double-blind, randomized, controlled CENTURION trial, which examined the efficacy and safety of lasmiditan as acute treatment across four migraine attacks. Patients completing the main study who treated ≥ 3 attacks could continue in the OLE. The initial lasmiditan dose was 100 mg, with dose adjustments to 50 mg or 200 mg allowed at the investigator's discretion. Patient and clinical characteristics were summarized by dosing pattern and completion status. Safety was assessed based on adverse event (AE) frequency by number of doses. In total, 445 patients treated ≥ 1 migraine attacks with lasmiditan during the OLE, 321 of whom (72.1%) completed the study. Forty-seven percent of patients remained on the 100-mg initial dose during the OLE whereas 20.2% used both 100 mg and 50 mg, 30.6% used both 100 mg and 200 mg, and 6 (1.3%) used multiple dose levels. All dosing patterns were associated with clinical and patient-reported improvement; however, the 100-mg group had the highest proportion of patients reporting improvement in the Patient Global Impression of Change - Migraine Headache Condition (56.5% vs 33.4%-52.2%). In comparison, all three groups that made dose adjustments had higher rates of completion compared to the 100-mg group (72.1%-83.3% vs 68.9%). The frequency of AEs decreased with continued use of lasmiditan. Concomitant triptans and lasmiditan use did not increase AE frequency. Based on high persistence and patient satisfaction rates, the 100-mg dose appears optimal for most patients. For those who adjusted dose levels, dose adjustments appeared beneficial to improve efficacy or tolerability, retaining patients on treatment. Collectively, the data suggest that patients who experienced efficacy continued to use lasmiditan regardless of the occurrence or frequency of AEs, and continued use appeared associated with fewer AEs. European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT): 2018-001661-17; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03670810; registration date: September 12, 2018.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The objective of this analysis was to gain new insights into the patient characteristics and other factors associated with lasmiditan usage and clinical outcomes under conditions resembling the real-world setting.
METHODS METHODS
This was a post hoc analysis of data from the 12-month, open-label extension (OLE) of the phase 3, double-blind, randomized, controlled CENTURION trial, which examined the efficacy and safety of lasmiditan as acute treatment across four migraine attacks. Patients completing the main study who treated ≥ 3 attacks could continue in the OLE. The initial lasmiditan dose was 100 mg, with dose adjustments to 50 mg or 200 mg allowed at the investigator's discretion. Patient and clinical characteristics were summarized by dosing pattern and completion status. Safety was assessed based on adverse event (AE) frequency by number of doses.
RESULTS RESULTS
In total, 445 patients treated ≥ 1 migraine attacks with lasmiditan during the OLE, 321 of whom (72.1%) completed the study. Forty-seven percent of patients remained on the 100-mg initial dose during the OLE whereas 20.2% used both 100 mg and 50 mg, 30.6% used both 100 mg and 200 mg, and 6 (1.3%) used multiple dose levels. All dosing patterns were associated with clinical and patient-reported improvement; however, the 100-mg group had the highest proportion of patients reporting improvement in the Patient Global Impression of Change - Migraine Headache Condition (56.5% vs 33.4%-52.2%). In comparison, all three groups that made dose adjustments had higher rates of completion compared to the 100-mg group (72.1%-83.3% vs 68.9%). The frequency of AEs decreased with continued use of lasmiditan. Concomitant triptans and lasmiditan use did not increase AE frequency.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Based on high persistence and patient satisfaction rates, the 100-mg dose appears optimal for most patients. For those who adjusted dose levels, dose adjustments appeared beneficial to improve efficacy or tolerability, retaining patients on treatment. Collectively, the data suggest that patients who experienced efficacy continued to use lasmiditan regardless of the occurrence or frequency of AEs, and continued use appeared associated with fewer AEs.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT): 2018-001661-17; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03670810; registration date: September 12, 2018.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38528476
doi: 10.1186/s10194-024-01745-y
pii: 10.1186/s10194-024-01745-y
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03670810']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

43

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Steiner TJ, Stovner LJ, Jensen R, Uluduz D, Katsarava Z (2020) Lifting the Burden: the Global Campaign against Headache, Migraine remains second among the world’s causes of disability, and first among young women: findings from GBD2019. J Headache Pain 21(1):137
doi: 10.1186/s10194-020-01208-0 pubmed: 33267788 pmcid: 7708887
Fan L, Wu Y, Wei J, Xia F, Cai Y, Zhang S, Miao J, Zhou Y, Liu C, Yan W et al (2023) Global, regional, and national time trends in incidence for migraine, from 1990 to 2019: an age-period-cohort analysis for the GBD 2019. J Headache Pain 24(1):79
doi: 10.1186/s10194-023-01619-9 pubmed: 37391721 pmcid: 10314517
Stovner LJ, Hagen K, Linde M, Steiner TJ (2022) The global prevalence of headache: an update, with analysis of the influences of methodological factors on prevalence estimates. J Headache Pain 23(1):34
doi: 10.1186/s10194-022-01402-2 pubmed: 35410119 pmcid: 9004186
Singh A, Gupta D, Sahoo AK (2020) Acute migraine: can the new drugs clinically outpace? SN Compr Clin Med 2:1132–1138
doi: 10.1007/s42399-020-00390-1
Wells-Gatnik WD, Wences Chirino TY, Onan FN, Onan D, Martelletti P (2023) Emerging experimental drugs in clinical trials for migraine: observations and key talking points. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 32(8):761–771
doi: 10.1080/13543784.2023.2254691 pubmed: 37672405
REYVOW® (lasmiditan) tablets package insert (2022). Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN. http://pi.lilly.com/us/reyvow-uspi.pdf . Accessed 8 Nov 2023
Food and Drug Administration (2019) FDA approves new treatment for patients with migraine. https://fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-new-treatment-patients-migraine . Accessed 8 Nov 2023
Goadsby PJ, Wietecha LA, Dennehy EB, Kuca B, Case MG, Aurora SK, Gaul C (2019) Phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of lasmiditan for acute treatment of migraine. Brain 142(7):1894–1904
doi: 10.1093/brain/awz134 pubmed: 31132795 pmcid: 6620826
Kuca B, Silberstein SD, Wietecha L, Berg PH, Dozier G, Lipton RB (2018) COL MIG-301 Study Group Lasmiditan is an effective acute treatment for migraine: A phase 3 randomized study. Neurology 91(24):e2222–e2232
Sakai F, Takeshima T, Homma G, Tanji Y, Katagiri H, Komori M (2021) Phase 2 randomized placebo-controlled study of lasmiditan for the acute treatment of migraine in Japanese patients. Headache 61(5):755–765
doi: 10.1111/head.14122 pubmed: 33990951 pmcid: 8252620
Ashina M, Reuter U, Smith T, Krikke-Workel J, Klise SR, Bragg S, Doty EG, Dowsett SA, Lin Q, Krege JH (2021) Randomized, controlled trial of lasmiditan over four migraine attacks: Findings from the CENTURION study. Cephalalgia 41(3):294–304
doi: 10.1177/0333102421989232 pubmed: 33541117 pmcid: 7961651
Tassorelli C, Bragg S, Krege JH, Doty EG, Ardayfio PA, Ruff D, Dowsett SA, Schwedt T (2021) Safety findings from CENTURION, a phase 3 consistency study of lasmiditan for the acute treatment of migraine. J Headache Pain 22(1):132
doi: 10.1186/s10194-021-01343-2 pubmed: 34742230 pmcid: 8572440
Ashina M, Roos C, Li LQ, Komori M, Ayer D, Ruff D, Krege JH (2023) Long-term treatment with lasmiditan in patients with migraine: Results from the open-label extension of the CENTURION randomized trial. Cephalalgia 43(4):3331024231161745
doi: 10.1177/03331024231161745 pubmed: 36950929
Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) (2018) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia 38(1):1–211
Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Sawyer J, Edmeads JG (2001) Clinical utility of an instrument assessing migraine disability: the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire. Headache 41(9):854–861
doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2001.01156.x pubmed: 11703471
Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Dowson AJ, Sawyer J (2001) Development and testing of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire to assess headache-related disability. Neurology 56(6 Suppl 1):S20–28
pubmed: 11294956
Martin BC, Pathak DS, Sharfman MI, Adelman JU, Taylor F, Kwong WJ, Jhingran P (2000) Validity and reliability of the migraine-specific quality of life questionnaire (MSQ Version 2.1). Headache 40(3):204–215
doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2000.00030.x pubmed: 10759923
Lipton RB, Fanning KM, Serrano D, Reed ML, Cady R, Buse DC (2015) Ineffective acute treatment of episodic migraine is associated with new-onset chronic migraine. Neurology 84(7):688–695
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001256 pubmed: 25609757 pmcid: 4336107
Guy W (ed) (1976) Clinical global impression, ECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology – revised. US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. National Institute of Mental Health, Rockville, MD
R Core Team (2019) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
Kitamura S, Imai N, Tanji Y, Ozeki A, Komori M (2023) Lasmiditan in Japanese patients with common migraine comorbidities or concomitant medications: A post hoc safety and efficacy analysis from the MONONOFU study. J Pain Res 16:1725–1738
doi: 10.2147/JPR.S399567 pubmed: 37255987 pmcid: 10226550
Polavieja P, Belger M, Venkata SK, Wilhelm S, Johansson E (2022) Relative efficacy of lasmiditan versus rimegepant and ubrogepant as acute treatments for migraine: network meta-analysis findings. J Headache Pain 23(1):76
doi: 10.1186/s10194-022-01440-w pubmed: 35790906 pmcid: 9258126
Brandes JL, Klise S, Krege JH, Case M, Khanna R, Vasudeva R, Raskin J, Pearlman EM, Kudrow D (2019) Interim results of a prospective, randomized, open-label, phase 3 study of the long-term safety and efficacy of lasmiditan for acute treatment of migraine (the GLADIATOR study). Cephalalgia 39(11):1343–1357
doi: 10.1177/0333102419864132 pubmed: 31433669 pmcid: 6779019
Tfelt-Hansen P (2011) Optimal balance of efficacy and tolerability of oral triptans and telcagepant: a review and a clinical comment. J Headache Pain 12(3):275–280
doi: 10.1007/s10194-011-0309-5 pubmed: 21350792 pmcid: 3094671
REYVOW® tablets (lasmiditan) tablets package insert for Japan (2023) Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN.  https://www.pmda.go.jp/PmdaSearch/iyakuDetail/ResultDataSetPDF/530471_1190030F1024_1_03 (Japanese) Accessed 28 Nov 2023
European Medicines Agency (2022) Rayvow. Lasmiditan.  https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/rayvow . Accessed 15 Nov 2023
Zhou Z, Urman R, Gill K, Park AS, Vuvu F, Patel LB, Lu J, Wade RL, Frerichs L, Bensink ME (2023) Treatment patterns for patients initiating novel acute migraine specific medications (nAMSMs) in the context of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway. J Headache Pain 24(1):153
doi: 10.1186/s10194-023-01678-y pubmed: 37946113 pmcid: 10634163

Auteurs

Mika Komori (M)

Japan Drug Development and Medical Affairs, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., 5-1-28, Isogamidori, Kobe-Shi, Chuo-Ku, 651-0086, Japan. komori_mika@lilly.com.

Akichika Ozeki (A)

Japan Drug Development and Medical Affairs, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., 5-1-28, Isogamidori, Kobe-Shi, Chuo-Ku, 651-0086, Japan.

Yuka Tanji (Y)

Japan Drug Development and Medical Affairs, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., 5-1-28, Isogamidori, Kobe-Shi, Chuo-Ku, 651-0086, Japan.

Eriko Kamiki (E)

Japan Drug Development and Medical Affairs, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., 5-1-28, Isogamidori, Kobe-Shi, Chuo-Ku, 651-0086, Japan.

John H Krege (JH)

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA.

Lily Qian Li (LQ)

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA.

Shiho Suzuki (S)

Department of Neurology, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu, Tochigi, Japan.

Mamoru Shibata (M)

Department of Neurology, Tokyo Dental College, Ichikawa General Hospital, Ichikawa, Japan.

Takao Takeshima (T)

Department of Neurology, Tominaga Hospital, Osaka, Japan.

Classifications MeSH