A novel large intragenic DPYD deletion causing dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency: a case report.
DPYD
Copy number variants
Deletion
Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase
Fluoropyrimidines
Toxicity
Journal
BMC medical genomics
ISSN: 1755-8794
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Genomics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101319628
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Mar 2024
25 Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
31
10
2023
accepted:
05
03
2024
medline:
26
3
2024
pubmed:
26
3
2024
entrez:
26
3
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), is the initial and rate-limiting enzyme in the catabolic pathway of pyrimidines. Deleterious variants in the DPYD gene cause DPD deficiency, a rare autosomal recessive disorder. The clinical spectrum of affected individuals is wide ranging from asymptomatic to severely affected patients presenting with intellectual disability, motor retardation, developmental delay and seizures. DPD is also important as the main enzyme in the catabolism of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) which is extensively used as a chemotherapeutic agent. Even in the absence of clinical symptoms, individuals with either complete or partial DPD deficiency face a high risk of severe and even fatal fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicity. The identification of causative genetic variants in DPYD is therefore gaining increasing attention due to their potential use as predictive markers of fluoropyrimidine toxicity. A male infant patient displaying biochemical features of DPD deficiency was investigated by clinical exome sequencing. Bioinformatics tools were used for data analysis and results were confirmed by MLPA and Sanger sequencing. A novel intragenic deletion of 71.2 kb in the DPYD gene was identified in homozygosity. The deletion, DPYD(NM_000110.4):c.850 + 23455_1128 + 8811del, eliminates exons 9 and 10 and may have resulted from a non-homologous end-joining event, as suggested by in silico analysis. The study expands the spectrum of DPYD variants associated with DPD deficiency. Furthermore, it raises the concern that patients at risk for fluoropyrimidine toxicity due to DPYD deletions could be missed during pre-treatment genetic testing for the currently recommended single nucleotide polymorphisms.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), is the initial and rate-limiting enzyme in the catabolic pathway of pyrimidines. Deleterious variants in the DPYD gene cause DPD deficiency, a rare autosomal recessive disorder. The clinical spectrum of affected individuals is wide ranging from asymptomatic to severely affected patients presenting with intellectual disability, motor retardation, developmental delay and seizures. DPD is also important as the main enzyme in the catabolism of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) which is extensively used as a chemotherapeutic agent. Even in the absence of clinical symptoms, individuals with either complete or partial DPD deficiency face a high risk of severe and even fatal fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicity. The identification of causative genetic variants in DPYD is therefore gaining increasing attention due to their potential use as predictive markers of fluoropyrimidine toxicity.
METHODS
METHODS
A male infant patient displaying biochemical features of DPD deficiency was investigated by clinical exome sequencing. Bioinformatics tools were used for data analysis and results were confirmed by MLPA and Sanger sequencing.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A novel intragenic deletion of 71.2 kb in the DPYD gene was identified in homozygosity. The deletion, DPYD(NM_000110.4):c.850 + 23455_1128 + 8811del, eliminates exons 9 and 10 and may have resulted from a non-homologous end-joining event, as suggested by in silico analysis.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The study expands the spectrum of DPYD variants associated with DPD deficiency. Furthermore, it raises the concern that patients at risk for fluoropyrimidine toxicity due to DPYD deletions could be missed during pre-treatment genetic testing for the currently recommended single nucleotide polymorphisms.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38528593
doi: 10.1186/s12920-024-01846-2
pii: 10.1186/s12920-024-01846-2
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
78Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Forouzesh DC, Moran GR. Mammalian dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2021;714:109066.
Berger R, Stoker-de Vries SA, Wadman SK, Duran M, Beemer FA, de Bree PK, et al. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency leading to thymine-uraciluria. An inborn error of pyrimidine metabolism. Clin Chim Acta. 1984;141(2–3):227–34.
doi: 10.1016/0009-8981(84)90014-7
pubmed: 6488556
Morel A, Boisdron-Celle M, Fey L, Soulie P, Craipeau MC, Traore S, et al. Clinical relevance of different dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene single nucleotide polymorphisms on 5-fluorouracil tolerance. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006;5(11):2895–904.
doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0327
pubmed: 17121937
Johnson MR, Diasio RB. Importance of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency in patients exhibiting toxicity following treatment with 5-fluorouracil. Adv Enzyme Regul. 2001;41:151–7.
doi: 10.1016/S0065-2571(00)00011-X
pubmed: 11384742
Van Kuilenburg AB, Vreken P, Abeling NG, Bakker HD, Meinsma R, Van Lenthe H, et al. Genotype and phenotype in patients with dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency. Hum Genet. 1999;104(1):1–9.
doi: 10.1007/PL00008711
pubmed: 10071185
Ezzeldin H, Diasio R. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency, a pharmacogenetic syndrome associated with potentially life-threatening toxicity following 5-fluorouracil administration. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2004;4(3):181–9.
doi: 10.3816/CCC.2004.n.018
pubmed: 15377401
Henricks LM, Opdam FL, Beijnen JH, Cats A, Schellens JHM. DPYD genotype-guided dose individualization to improve patient safety of fluoropyrimidine therapy: call for a drug label update. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(12):2915–22.
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx411
pubmed: 29045513
Diasio RB, Harris BE. Clinical pharmacology of 5-fluorouracil. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1989;16(4):215–37.
doi: 10.2165/00003088-198916040-00002
pubmed: 2656050
van Kuilenburg AB. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and the efficacy and toxicity of 5-fluorouracil. Eur J Cancer. 2004;40(7):939–50.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2003.12.004
pubmed: 15093568
EMA recommendations on DPD testing prior to treatment with fluorouracil, capecitabine, tegafur and flucytosine. 2020. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/ema-recommendations-dpd-testing-prior-treatment-fluorouracilcapecitabine-tegafur-flucytosine . Accessed 20 Sept 2023.
Johnson MR, Wang K, Tillmanns S, Albin N, Diasio RB. Structural organization of the human dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene. Cancer Res. 1997;57(9):1660–3.
pubmed: 9135003
Wei X, Elizondo G, Sapone A, McLeod HL, Raunio H, Fernandez-Salguero P, et al. Characterization of the human dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene. Genomics. 1998;51(3):391–400.
doi: 10.1006/geno.1998.5379
pubmed: 9721209
Meulendijks D, Henricks LM, Sonke GS, Deenen MJ, Froehlich TK, Amstutz U, et al. Clinical relevance of DPYD variants c.1679T>G, c.1236G>A/HapB3, and c.1601G>A as predictors of severe fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(16):1639–50.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00286-7
pubmed: 26603945
Amstutz U, Henricks LM, Offer SM, Barbarino J, Schellens JHM, Swen JJ, et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guideline for Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Genotype and Fluoropyrimidine Dosing: 2017 Update. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018;103(2):210–6.
doi: 10.1002/cpt.911
pubmed: 29152729
Knikman JE, Gelderblom H, Beijnen JH, Cats A, Guchelaar HJ, Henricks LM. Individualized dosing of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy to prevent severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity: what are the options? Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021;109(3):591–604.
doi: 10.1002/cpt.2069
pubmed: 33020924
Garcia-Gonzalez X, Kaczmarczyk B, Abarca-Zabalia J, Thomas F, Garcia-Alfonso P, Robles L, et al. New DPYD variants causing DPD deficiency in patients treated with fluoropyrimidine. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2020;86(1):45–54.
doi: 10.1007/s00280-020-04093-1
pubmed: 32529295
Offer SM, Fossum CC, Wegner NJ, Stuflesser AJ, Butterfield GL, Diasio RB. Comparative functional analysis of DPYD variants of potential clinical relevance to dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity. Cancer Res. 2014;74(9):2545–54.
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2482
pubmed: 24648345
pmcid: 4012613
Saarenheimo J, Wahid N, Eigeliene N, Ravi R, Salomons GS, Ojeda MF, et al. Preemptive screening of DPYD as part of clinical practice: high prevalence of a novel exon 4 deletion in the Finnish population. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2021;87(5):657–63.
doi: 10.1007/s00280-021-04236-y
pubmed: 33544210
Wigle TJ, Medwid S, Ross C, Schwarz UI, Kim RB. DPYD Exon 4 Deletion Associated with Fluoropyrimidine Toxicity and Importance of Copy Number Variation. Curr Oncol. 2023;30(1):663–72.
doi: 10.3390/curroncol30010051
pubmed: 36661700
pmcid: 9857685
Rinaldo P. Organic acids. In: Blau N, Duran M, Gibson KM, editors. Laboratory guide to the methods in biochemical genetics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2008. p. 137–69.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-76698-8_9
Garcia M, Juhos S, Larsson M, Olason PI, Martin M, Eisfeldt J, et al. Sarek: A portable workflow for whole-genome sequencing analysis of germline and somatic variants. F1000Res. 2020;9:63.
Di Tommaso P, Chatzou M, Floden EW, Barja PP, Palumbo E, Notredame C. Nextflow enables reproducible computational workflows. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35(4):316–9.
doi: 10.1038/nbt.3820
pubmed: 28398311
Andrews S. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. 2017. http://www.bioinformaticsbabrahamacuk/projects/fastqc .
Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(17):i884–90.
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560
pubmed: 30423086
pmcid: 6129281
McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20(9):1297–303.
doi: 10.1101/gr.107524.110
pubmed: 20644199
pmcid: 2928508
Pedersen BS, Quinlan AR. Mosdepth: quick coverage calculation for genomes and exomes. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(5):867–8.
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx699
pubmed: 29096012
Talevich E, Shain AH, Botton T, Bastian BC. CNVkit: Genome-Wide Copy Number Detection and Visualization from Targeted DNA Sequencing. PLoS Comput Biol. 2016;12(4):e1004873.
Robinson JT, Thorvaldsdottir H, Turner D, Mesirov JP. igv.js: an embeddable JavaScript implementation of the Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV). Bioinformatics. 2023;39(1).
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2013. http://www.R-project.org/ .
Wickham H, Averick M, Bryan J, Chang W, D’ Agostino McGowan L, Francois R, et al. Welcome to Tidyverse. The Journal of Open Source Software. 2019;4(43):1686.
Wickham H. ggplot2. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics. 2011;3(2):180–5.
doi: 10.1002/wics.147
Mattison LK, Johnson MR, Diasio RB. A comparative analysis of translated dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase cDNA; conservation of functional domains and relevance to genetic polymorphisms. Pharmacogenetics. 2002;12(2):133–44.
doi: 10.1097/00008571-200203000-00007
pubmed: 11875367
Hormozian F, Schmitt JG, Sagulenko E, Schwab M, Savelyeva L. FRA1E common fragile site breaks map within a 370kilobase pair region and disrupt the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene (DPYD). Cancer Lett. 2007;246(1–2):82–91.
doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2006.02.004
pubmed: 16556484
Mirceta M, Shum N, Schmidt MHM, Pearson CE. Fragile sites, chromosomal lesions, tandem repeats, and disease. Front Genet. 2022;13:985975.
Carvalho CM, Lupski JR. Mechanisms underlying structural variant formation in genomic disorders. Nat Rev Genet. 2016;17(4):224–38.
doi: 10.1038/nrg.2015.25
pubmed: 26924765
pmcid: 4827625
Georgakopoulos-Soares I, Morganella S, Jain N, Hemberg M, Nik-Zainal S. Noncanonical secondary structures arising from non-B DNA motifs are determinants of mutagenesis. Genome Res. 2018;28(9):1264–71.
doi: 10.1101/gr.231688.117
pubmed: 30104284
pmcid: 6120622
Qi M, Stenson PD, Ball EV, Tainer JA, Bacolla A, Kehrer-Sawatzki H, et al. Distinct sequence features underlie microdeletions and gross deletions in the human genome. Hum Mutat. 2022;43(3):328–46.
doi: 10.1002/humu.24314
pubmed: 34918412
pmcid: 9069542
Loganayagam A, Arenas-Hernandez M, Fairbanks L, Ross P, Sanderson JD, Marinaki AM. The contribution of deleterious DPYD gene sequence variants to fluoropyrimidine toxicity in British cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2010;65(2):403–6.
doi: 10.1007/s00280-009-1147-x
pubmed: 19795123
Ragia G, Maslarinou A, Atzemian N, Biziota E, Koukaki T, Ioannou C, et al. Implementing pharmacogenetic testing in fluoropyrimidine-treated cancer patients: DPYD genotyping to guide chemotherapy dosing in Greece. Front Pharmacol. 2023;14:1248898.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1248898
pubmed: 37781702
pmcid: 10536177
de With M, Sadlon A, Cecchin E, Haufroid V, Thomas F, Joerger M, et al. Implementation of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency testing in Europe. ESMO Open. 2023;8(2):101197.
Henricks LM, Lunenburg C, de Man FM, Meulendijks D, Frederix GWJ, Kienhuis E, et al. DPYD genotype-guided dose individualisation of fluoropyrimidine therapy in patients with cancer: a prospective safety analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(11):1459–67.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30686-7
pubmed: 30348537
Wigle TJ, Povitz BL, Medwid S, Teft WA, Legan RM, Lenehan J, et al. Impact of pretreatment dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase genotype-guided fluoropyrimidine dosing on chemotherapy associated adverse events. Clin Transl Sci. 2021;14(4):1338–48.
doi: 10.1111/cts.12981
pubmed: 33620159
pmcid: 8301551
van Kuilenburg AB, Meijer J, Mul AN, Hennekam RC, Hoovers JM, de Die-Smulders CE, et al. Analysis of severely affected patients with dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency reveals large intragenic rearrangements of DPYD and a de novo interstitial deletion del(1)(p13.3p21.3). Hum Genet. 2009;125(5–6):581–90.
doi: 10.1007/s00439-009-0653-6
pubmed: 19296131
Riggs ER, Andersen EF, Cherry AM, Kantarci S, Kearney H, Patel A, et al. Technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen). Genet Med. 2020;22(2):245–57.
doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0686-8
pubmed: 31690835