Multicenter, retrospective comparison of implant survival, complications and cost between plate and screw and intramedullary nail fixation for metastatic lesions of the diaphyseal humerus.

Background

The humerus is a common site of metastatic disease that can be fixated with either plate and screw or intramedullary nail (IMN) constructs. A multicenter retrospective comparison study was undertaken to compare implant survival, complication rate and cost between the two constructs. No prior studies have included a cost comparison.

Methods

Databases of two academic practices were queried retrospectively to identify patients with metastases of the humerus. Inclusion criteria were a lesion in the proximal metaphysis to distal diaphysis and amenable to both implant options with available cost data. Follow-up was at least 6 months barring death or discharge to hospice sooner. Demographic, clinical and outcome data was recorded. Costs were estimated based on contract pricing. Operating room (OR) costs were estimated using per minute OR costs proposed by other investigators.

Results

One hundred and one humeri in 96 patients were included (72 plates and 29 nails). The most common malignancies were renal cell, myeloma and lung. Half presented with a displaced fracture. Demographics were similar in both groups. Lesions were larger in the plate group. Surgical times were longer in the plate group, 146

Conclusions

IMN of metastases of the humerus offers a faster, potentially more durable construct with lower blood loss, faster OR times and decreased cost of implantation.

Informations de copyright

2022 Annals of Joint. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://aoj.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/aoj-20-101/coif). The series “Bone Metastasis” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.