Outcomes of modular stem for the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fracture: a systematic review of the literature.

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) modular tapered titanium stem (MTTS) periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) vancouver classification

Journal

Annals of joint
ISSN: 2415-6809
Titre abrégé: Ann Jt
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101711195

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 11 03 2023
accepted: 10 07 2023
medline: 26 3 2024
pubmed: 26 3 2024
entrez: 26 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) are a frequent complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Both modular and non-modular tapered fluted titanium (TFT) stems could be used in total hip revisions (THRs). Nevertheless, the most appropriate femoral stem type is still under debate. The current systematic review aims to analyze the survival rate and all causes of stem revision, the overall complication rate and reason for reoperation, and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in THR for PFF using the modular tapered titanium stems (MTTS). A comprehensive search in four databases, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases, was performed, and following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, starting from 1,259 studies. The risk of bias was analyzed according to the MINORS tool system. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed for all data extracted. Eighteen clinical studies were included in the qualitative analysis for a total of 775 patients enrolled. A mean MINORS criteria score of 9.8 [8-12] was reported. The overall survival of MTTS for PFF treatment was 95.4%, with an overall reintervention rate of 10.3% at an average follow-up of 4.5 years. Despite the use of modular components, postoperative hip instability remains the most frequent complication and cause of reintervention in these patients. In addition, a mean postoperative Harris Hip Score (HHS) of 78.1 was reported, which was considered acceptable given the high mean age of 74.1 years at the time of the revision. Several therapeutic approaches and a wide variety of implants have been described in the literature for PFF management; however, no one solution has proven superior to others in the PFF treatment. MTTS has become a commonly used treatment option for Vancouver B2 and B3 fractures because they provide good clinical and radiological results with a reasonable survival rate. However, the complication rate of MTTS is still high.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) are a frequent complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Both modular and non-modular tapered fluted titanium (TFT) stems could be used in total hip revisions (THRs). Nevertheless, the most appropriate femoral stem type is still under debate. The current systematic review aims to analyze the survival rate and all causes of stem revision, the overall complication rate and reason for reoperation, and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in THR for PFF using the modular tapered titanium stems (MTTS).
Methods UNASSIGNED
A comprehensive search in four databases, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases, was performed, and following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, starting from 1,259 studies. The risk of bias was analyzed according to the MINORS tool system. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed for all data extracted.
Results UNASSIGNED
Eighteen clinical studies were included in the qualitative analysis for a total of 775 patients enrolled. A mean MINORS criteria score of 9.8 [8-12] was reported. The overall survival of MTTS for PFF treatment was 95.4%, with an overall reintervention rate of 10.3% at an average follow-up of 4.5 years. Despite the use of modular components, postoperative hip instability remains the most frequent complication and cause of reintervention in these patients. In addition, a mean postoperative Harris Hip Score (HHS) of 78.1 was reported, which was considered acceptable given the high mean age of 74.1 years at the time of the revision.
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
Several therapeutic approaches and a wide variety of implants have been described in the literature for PFF management; however, no one solution has proven superior to others in the PFF treatment. MTTS has become a commonly used treatment option for Vancouver B2 and B3 fractures because they provide good clinical and radiological results with a reasonable survival rate. However, the complication rate of MTTS is still high.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38529241
doi: 10.21037/aoj-23-27
pii: aoj-08-40
pmc: PMC10929446
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

40

Informations de copyright

2023 Annals of Joint. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://aoj.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/aoj-23-27/coif). The series “Modular Implants for Revision Arthroplasty in Orthopedics” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. GS served as the unpaid Guest Editor for the special series and serves as an unpaid editorial board member of Annals of Joint from October 2022 to September 2024. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

Auteurs

Giorgio Cacciola (G)

Orthopaedic and Traumatology Department, Orthopaedic and Trauma Center, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Lorenzo Braconi (L)

Orthopaedic and Traumatology Department, Orthopaedic and Trauma Center, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Francesco Bosco (F)

Orthopaedic and Traumatology Department, Orthopaedic and Trauma Center, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Ospedale San Giovanni Bosco di Torino-ASL Città di Torino, Turin, Italy.

Fortunato Giustra (F)

Orthopaedic and Traumatology Department, Orthopaedic and Trauma Center, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Ospedale San Giovanni Bosco di Torino-ASL Città di Torino, Turin, Italy.

Luigi Sabatini (L)

Orthopaedic and Traumatology Department, Orthopaedic and Trauma Center, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Marcello Capella (M)

Orthopaedic and Traumatology Department, Orthopaedic and Trauma Center, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Federico De Meo (F)

Orthopaedic Institute of Southern Italy "Franco Scalabrino", Messina, Italy.

Pietro Cavaliere (P)

Orthopaedic Institute of Southern Italy "Franco Scalabrino", Messina, Italy.

Giuseppe Solarino (G)

Orthopaedic & Trauma Unit, Department of Translational Biomedicine and Neuroscience, University of Bari "Aldo Moro"-AOU Policlinico Consorziale, School of Medicine, Bari, Italy.

Classifications MeSH