Spontaneous echo contrast and decreased umbilical vein blood flow may predict thrombus formation in fetal intra-abdominal umbilical vein varix.

Fetal intra-abdominal umbilical vein varix (FIUVV) Spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) Thrombosis

Journal

Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001)
ISSN: 1613-2254
Titre abrégé: J Med Ultrason (2001)
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101128385

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 06 01 2023
accepted: 09 02 2024
medline: 26 3 2024
pubmed: 26 3 2024
entrez: 26 3 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Fetal intra-abdominal umbilical vein varix (FIUVV) can cause thrombosis, fetal growth restriction (FGR), and intrauterine fetal death (IUFD). However, its management and evaluation to avoid fetal risks have not been elucidated. The aim of this study was to develop a novel method to evaluate fetal risks, including FGR and fetal dysfunction via frequent ultrasound examinations. A 28-year-old pregnant woman was diagnosed with FIUVV via ultrasound at 26 weeks of gestation and admitted to our hospital. Ultrasound examinations were performed two to three times weekly to evaluate size and shape of the FIUVV and umbilical vein blood flow at the inflow and outflow sites of the FIUVV. The outflow site of the FIUVV was constricted and collapsed, and the blood flow velocity at the inflow site of the FIUVV was decreased. At 32 weeks of gestation, spontaneous echo contrast (SEC), which indicates increased echogenicity, appeared. At 35 weeks of gestation, the patient noticed decreased fetal movement, and CTG showed non-reassuring fetal status. SEC in the FIUVV was remarkable. Fetal movement could not be confirmed at ultrasound. Cesarean section was performed and a 1,854-g healthy infant was delivered with an umbilical cord arterial pH of 7.266. The echographic changes, such as decreased umbilical vein blood flow and SEC, in FIUVV observed in this case could indicate thrombus formation, which can lead to fetal dysfunction. Frequent ultrasound examinations can help determine the timing of delivery and improve the neonatal prognosis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38530506
doi: 10.1007/s10396-024-01428-w
pii: 10.1007/s10396-024-01428-w
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Japan Society of Ultrasonics in Medicine.

Références

Lee SW, Kim MY, Kim JE, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of antenatal fetal intra-abdominal umbilical vein varix detection. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2014;57:181–6.
doi: 10.5468/ogs.2014.57.3.181 pubmed: 24883288 pmcid: 4038683
Bas-Lando M, Rabinowitz R, Samueloff A, et al. The prenatal diagnosis of isolated fetal varix of the intra-abdominal umbilical vein is associated with favorable neonatal outcome at term: a case series. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;288:33–9.
doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2743-x pubmed: 23389248
Weissmann-Brenner A, Simchen MJ, Moran O, et al. Isolated fetal umbilical vein varix–prenatal sonographic diagnosis and suggested management. Prenat Diagn. 2009;29:229–33.
doi: 10.1002/pd.2219 pubmed: 19177454
Fung TY, Leung TN, Leung TY, et al. Fetal intra-abdominal umbilical vein varix: what is the clinical significance? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25:149–54.
doi: 10.1002/uog.1815 pubmed: 15685644
Valsky DV, Rosenak D, Hochner-Celnikier D, et al. Adverse outcome of isolated fetal intra-abdominal umbilical vein varix despite close monitoring. Prenat Diagn. 2004;24:451–4.
doi: 10.1002/pd.897 pubmed: 15229845
di Pasquo E, Kuleva M, O’Gorman N, et al. Fetal intra-abdominal umbilical vein varix: retrospective cohort study and systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51:580–5.
doi: 10.1002/uog.18895 pubmed: 28876490
Fuster JS, Benasco C, Saad I. Giant dilatation of the umbilical vein. J Clin Ultrasound. 1985;13:363–5.
doi: 10.1002/jcu.1870130516 pubmed: 3924973
Gowda S, Chakkalakkoombil SV, Bharathi S, et al. Large fetal intra-abdominal umbilical vein varix: antenatal sonographic diagnosis and follow-up. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019;45:1936–40.
doi: 10.1111/jog.14045 pubmed: 31237393
Beraud E, Rozel C, Milon J, et al. Umbilical vein varix: Importance of ante- and post-natal monitoring by ultrasound. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2015;96:21–6.
doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2014.01.009 pubmed: 24631035
Merino A, Hauptman P, Badimon L, et al. Echocardiographic “smoke” is produced by an interaction of erythrocytes and plasma proteins modulated by shear forces. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:1661–8.
doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90463-W pubmed: 1452941
Leung DY, Black IW, Cranney GB, et al. Prognostic implications of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:755–62.
doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90025-6 pubmed: 8077549
Fatkin D, Kelly RP, Feneley MP. Relations between left atrial appendage blood flow velocity, spontaneous echocardiographic contrast and thromboembolic risk in vivo. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:961–9.
doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90644-0 pubmed: 8106703
Mügge A, Kühn H, Nikutta P, et al. Assessment of left atrial appendage function by biplane transesophageal echocardiography in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation: identification of a subgroup of patients at increased embolic risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:599–607.
doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90743-9 pubmed: 8113541
Io S, Kondoh E, Iemura Y, et al. Severe fetal anemia as a consequence of extra-abdominal umbilical vein varix: a case report and review of the literature. Congenit Anom (Kyoto). 2021;61:4–8.
doi: 10.1111/cga.12397 pubmed: 33099808
Song QY, Tang Y. Foetal death due to extensive extra-abdominal umbilical vein Varix with umbilical vein thrombosis: a case report. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23:155.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05485-w pubmed: 36890479 pmcid: 9993576

Auteurs

Yu Takaishi (Y)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center, Amagasaki, Japan.

Kaoru Kawasaki (K)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan. kkaoru@med.kindai.ac.jp.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2 Ohno-Higashi, Osaka-Sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan. kkaoru@med.kindai.ac.jp.

Kazuhiko Uematsu (K)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Kosaka Womens Hospital, Higashi-Osaka, Japan.

Shinya Yoshioka (S)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.

Classifications MeSH