The Alarming Rate of Malnutrition after Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal Bypass. A single Centre Experience.
Innovative procedure
Malnutrition
SASI
Journal
Obesity surgery
ISSN: 1708-0428
Titre abrégé: Obes Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9106714
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Mar 2024
27 Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
13
02
2024
accepted:
20
03
2024
revised:
19
03
2024
medline:
27
3
2024
pubmed:
27
3
2024
entrez:
27
3
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass is a modification of sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition (SG + TB). This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of SASI as a primary metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS). This is a retrospective case series of 30 patients who underwent SASI bypass from January to December 2021. All patients completed at least 12 months of follow-up. Among the 30 patients, 93.3% were women, the mean age was 37.4 years, and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 45.6 kg/m Despite good short-term weight loss and improvement of obesity-associated complications, SASI is accompanied by high alarming malnutrition, even in short-term follow-up. Novel MBS should be judged for their long-term effects and compared to well-tested standard operations before they are used in routine clinical practice.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass is a modification of sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition (SG + TB). This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of SASI as a primary metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS).
METHODS
METHODS
This is a retrospective case series of 30 patients who underwent SASI bypass from January to December 2021. All patients completed at least 12 months of follow-up.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Among the 30 patients, 93.3% were women, the mean age was 37.4 years, and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 45.6 kg/m
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Despite good short-term weight loss and improvement of obesity-associated complications, SASI is accompanied by high alarming malnutrition, even in short-term follow-up. Novel MBS should be judged for their long-term effects and compared to well-tested standard operations before they are used in routine clinical practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38532145
doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07192-7
pii: 10.1007/s11695-024-07192-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Sjöström L. Review of the key results from the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) trial - a prospective controlled intervention study of bariatric surgery. J Intern Med. 2013;273(3):219–34.
doi: 10.1111/joim.12012
pubmed: 23163728
Perdomo CM, Cohen RV, Sumithran P, et al. Contemporary medical, device, and surgical therapies for adult obesity. Lancet. 2023;401(10382):1116–30.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02403-5
pubmed: 36774932
Haddad A, Kow L, Herrera MF, et al. Innovative Bariatric Procedures and Ethics in Bariatric Surgery: the IFSO Position Statement. Obes Surg. 2022;32(10):3217–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-06220-8 . (Epub 2022 Aug 3. Erratum in Obes Surg 2022 Aug 22 PMID 35922610).
doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06220-8
pubmed: 35922610
Emile SH, Madyan A, Mahdy T, et al. Single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy: a case-matched multicenter study. Surg Endosc. 2021;35(2):652–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07430-w . (Epub 2020 Feb 18PMID: 32072282).
doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07430-w
pubmed: 32072282
Mahawar KK, Borg CM, Agarwal S, et al. Criteria for Inclusion of Newer Bariatric and Metabolic Procedures into the Mainstream: a Survey of 396 Bariatric Surgeons. Obes Surg. 2017;27(4):873–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2398-3 . (PMID: 27709488).
doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2398-3
pubmed: 27709488
Kermansaravi M, Kabir A, Pazouki A. 1-Year Follow-up of Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal (SASI) Bypass in Morbid Obese Patients: Efficacy and Concerns. Obes Surg. 2020;30(11):4286–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04781-0 . (Epub 2020 Jul 17 PMID: 32681291).
doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04781-0
pubmed: 32681291
Hosseini SV, Moeinvaziri N, Medhati P, et al. Optimal Length of Biliopancreatic Limb in Single Anastomosis Sleeve Gastrointestinal Bypass for Treatment of Severe Obesity: Efficacy and Concerns. Obes Surg. 2022;32(8):2582–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-06107-8 . (Epub 2022 May 18 PMID: 35583584).
doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06107-8
pubmed: 35583584
Santoro S, Castro LC, Velhote MCP, et al. Cas- tro LP, Lacombe A, Santo MA, Sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition: a potent intervention for metabolic syndrome and obe- sity. Ann Surg. 2012;256:104–10.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825370c0
pubmed: 22609843
Emile SH, Mahdy T, Schou C, et al. Systematic review of the outcome of single-anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass in treatment of morbid obesity with proportion meta-analysis of improvement in diabetes mellitus. Int J Surg. 2021;92:106024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106024 . (Epub 2021 Jul 9 PMID: 34252597).
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106024
pubmed: 34252597
Mahdy T, Emile SH, Madyan A, et al. Evaluation of the Efficacy of Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal (SASI) Bypass for Patients with Morbid Obesity: a Multicenter Study. Obes Surg. 2020;30(3):837–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-04296-3 . (PMID: 31734889).
doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04296-3
pubmed: 31734889
Ribeiro R, Viveiros O, Taranu V, et al. One Anastomosis Transit Bipartition (OATB): Rational and Mid-term Outcomes. Obes Surg. 2023;34(2):371–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06988-3 . (Epub ahead of print PMID 38135740).
doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06988-3
pubmed: 38135740
Scopinaro N, Marinari GM, Camerini GB, et al. Specific effects of biliopancreatic diversion on the major components of metabolic syndrome: a long-term follow-up study. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(10):2406–11. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.28.10.2406 . (PMID: 16186271).
doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.10.2406
pubmed: 16186271
Papadia F, Carlini F, Longo G, et al. Pyrrhic victory? Long-term results of biliopancreatic diversion on patients with type 2 diabetes and severe obesity. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2023;19(10):1110–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2023.04.300 . (Epub2023 Apr 11 PMID: 37156659).
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2023.04.300
pubmed: 37156659
Haddad A, Cohen RV. Reply to the letter to the editor titled “The questionable IFSO position statement”. Is it acceptable to call a position statement questionable to raise more doubt about an already debatable procedure? OBES SURG. 2023;33(2):668–9.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06408-y
pubmed: 36502438
Santoro S, Velhote MCP, Malzoni CE, et al. Digestive Adaptation with Intestinal Reserve: A New Surgical Proposal for Morbid Obesity. Rev bras videocir. 2004;2(3):130–8.
Santoro S, Malzoni CE, Velhote MC, et al. Digestive Adaptation with Intestinal Reserve: a neuroendocrine-based operation for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2006;16(10):1371–9.
doi: 10.1381/096089206778663841
pubmed: 17059749