Better together: A multistakeholder approach to developing specialty-wide entrustable professional activities in emergency medicine.


Journal

AEM education and training
ISSN: 2472-5390
Titre abrégé: AEM Educ Train
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101722142

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 27 12 2023
revised: 28 02 2024
accepted: 04 03 2024
pmc-release: 25 03 2025
medline: 27 3 2024
pubmed: 27 3 2024
entrez: 27 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) are a widely used framework for curriculum and assessment, yet the variability in emergency medicine (EM) training programs mandates the development of EPAs that meet the needs of the specialty as a whole. This requires eliciting and incorporating the perspectives of multiple stakeholders (i.e., faculty, residents, and patients) in the development of EPAs. Without a shared understanding of what a resident must be able to do upon graduation, we run the risk of advancing ill-prepared residents that may provide inconsistent care. In an effort to address these challenges, beginning in February 2020, the authors assembled an advisory board of 25 EM faculty to draft and reach consensus on a final list of EPAs that can be used across all training programs within the specialty of EM. Using modified Delphi methodology, the authors came to consensus on an initial list of 22 EPAs. The authors presented these EPAs to faculty supervisors, residents, and patients for refinement. The authors collated and analyzed feedback from focus groups of residents and patients using thematic analysis. The EPAs were subsequently refined based on this feedback. Stakeholders in EM residency training endorsed a final revised list of 22 EPAs. Stakeholder focus groups highlighted two main thematic considerations that helped shape the finalized list of EM EPAs: attention to the meaningful nuances of EPA language and contextualizing the EPAs and viewing them developmentally. To foreground all key stakeholders within the EPA process for EM, the authors chose within the development process to draft; come to consensus; and refine EPAs for EM in collaboration with relevant faculty, patient, and resident stakeholders. Each stakeholder group contributed meaningfully to the content and intended implementation of the EPAs. This process may serve as a model for others in developing stakeholder-responsive EPAs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38532740
doi: 10.1002/aet2.10974
pii: AET210974
pmc: PMC10962124
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e10974

Informations de copyright

© 2024 Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Holly A Caretta-Weyer (HA)

Department of Emergency Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Palo Alto California USA.

Stefanie S Sebok-Syer (SS)

Department of Emergency Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Palo Alto California USA.

Amanda M Morris (AM)

Department of Emergency Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Palo Alto California USA.

Benjamin H Schnapp (BH)

Berbee Walsh Department of Emergency Medicine University of Wisconsin Madison Wisconsin USA.

Abra L Fant (AL)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine McGaw Medical Center at Northwestern University Chicago Illinois USA.

Kevin R Scott (KR)

Department of Emergency Medicine University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.

Matthew Pirotte (M)

Department of Emergency Medicine Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee USA.

Michael A Gisondi (MA)

Department of Emergency Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Palo Alto California USA.

Lalena M Yarris (LM)

Department of Emergency Medicine Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA.

Classifications MeSH