Mandibular Body Osteotomy Combined with Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy for the Treatment of Severe Skeletal Class Ⅲ Malocclusion with Ankylosed Teeth.
Journal
The Journal of craniofacial surgery
ISSN: 1536-3732
Titre abrégé: J Craniofac Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9010410
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Mar 2024
27 Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
07
12
2023
accepted:
15
01
2024
medline:
27
3
2024
pubmed:
27
3
2024
entrez:
27
3
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
This study presents a combination of 2 different surgery procedures performed on the mandible as part of the treatment aiming to improve the facial profile and occlusal function of patients with severe skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion and bilateral edentulous gaps. The teeth next to the edentulous gaps were found to be ankylosed. Mandibular setback by bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomies and mandibular body osteotomies, combined with Le Fort Ⅰ level maxillary advancement were performed, since the chief complaint of the patient was a concave profile. As a result, the skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion had been corrected, a satisfying facial profile had been achieved, and no apparent adverse effect was found. Thus, it has been proved that the combination of sagittal split ramus osteotomy and mandibular body osteotomy is available for correcting skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38534174
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000010075
pii: 00001665-990000000-01421
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Références
Bousquet P, Artz C, Renaud M, et al. Relocation of infrapositioned ankylosed teeth: description of orthodontic bone stretching and case series. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;74:1914–1925
Sencimen M, Gulses A, Sabuncuoglu FA, et al. Rectangular body ostectomy for the treatment of severe mandibular prognathism. J Craniofac Surg 2012;23:e190–e193
Kim YJ, Lee BK. Recent trends in orthognathic surgery in Asia. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2021;29:549–566
Chiu G, Chang C, Roberts WE. Interdisciplinary treatment for a compensated class II partially edentulous malocclusion: orthodontic creation of a posterior implant site. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018;153:422–435
Nagase T, Kurakata M, Komuro Y, et al. Vertical symphyseal osteotomy. J Craniofac Surg 1998;9:338–343
Suda N, Tominaga N, Niinaka Y, et al. Orthognathic treatment for a patient with facial asymmetry associated with unilateral scissors-bite and a collapsed mandibular arch. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;141:94–104
Kinzinger GS, Jänicke S, Riediger D, et al. Orthodontic fine adjustment after vertical callus distraction of an ankylosed incisor using the floating bone concept. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:582–590
Medeiros PJ, Bezerra AR. Treatment of an ankylosed central incisor by single-tooth dento-osseous osteotomy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;112:496–501
Lownie JF, Cleaton-Jones PE, Coleman H, et al. Long-term histologic changes in the dental pulp after posterior segmental osteotomies. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;87:299–304
Bansal P, Singh V, Anand SC, et al. Relevance of anterior mandibular body ostectomy in mandibular prognathism. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2013;4:57–65
Xie K, Wang L, Chen K, et al. Application of 3D-printed surgical cutting guide in anterior mandibular body ostectomy. J Craniofac Surg 2023;34:656–657