Exploring Regorafenib Responsiveness and Uncovering Molecular Mechanisms in Recurrent Glioblastoma Tumors through Longitudinal In Vitro Sampling.

NADP(H) FLIM Regorafenib drug response glioblastoma organoids

Journal

Cells
ISSN: 2073-4409
Titre abrégé: Cells
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101600052

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 07 02 2024
revised: 06 03 2024
accepted: 07 03 2024
medline: 27 3 2024
pubmed: 27 3 2024
entrez: 27 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Glioblastoma, a deadly brain tumor, shows limited response to standard therapies like temozolomide (TMZ). Recent findings from the REGOMA trial underscore a significant survival improvement offered by Regorafenib (REGO) in recurrent glioblastoma. Our study aimed to propose a 3D ex vivo drug response precision medicine approach to investigate recurrent glioblastoma sensitivity to REGO and elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms involved in tumor resistance or responsiveness to treatment. Three-dimensional glioblastoma organoids (GB-EXPs) obtained from 18 patients' resected recurrent glioblastoma tumors were treated with TMZ and REGO. Drug responses were evaluated using NAD(P)H FLIM, stratifying tumors as responders (Resp) or non-responders (NRs). Whole-exome sequencing was performed on 16 tissue samples, and whole-transcriptome analysis on 13 GB-EXPs treated and untreated. We found 35% (n = 9) and 77% (n = 20) of tumors responded to TMZ and REGO, respectively, with no instances of TMZ-Resp being REGO-NRs. Exome analysis revealed a unique mutational profile in REGO-Resp tumors compared to NR tumors. Transcriptome analysis identified distinct expression patterns in Resp and NR tumors, impacting Rho GTPase and NOTCH signaling, known to be involved in drug response. In conclusion, recurrent glioblastoma tumors were more responsive to REGO compared to TMZ treatment. Importantly, our approach enables a comprehensive longitudinal exploration of the molecular changes induced by treatment, unveiling promising biomarkers indicative of drug response.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38534332
pii: cells13060487
doi: 10.3390/cells13060487
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Mariangela Morelli (M)

Fondazione Pisana per la Scienza, San Giuliano Terme, 56017 Pisa, Italy.

Francesca Lessi (F)

Fondazione Pisana per la Scienza, San Giuliano Terme, 56017 Pisa, Italy.

Sara Franceschi (S)

Fondazione Pisana per la Scienza, San Giuliano Terme, 56017 Pisa, Italy.

Gianmarco Ferri (G)

Fondazione Pisana per la Scienza, San Giuliano Terme, 56017 Pisa, Italy.

Manuel Giacomarra (M)

Fondazione Pisana per la Scienza, San Giuliano Terme, 56017 Pisa, Italy.

Michele Menicagli (M)

Fondazione Pisana per la Scienza, San Giuliano Terme, 56017 Pisa, Italy.

Carlo Gambacciani (C)

Neurosurgical Department of Spedali Riuniti di Livorno, 57124 Livorno, Italy.

Francesco Pieri (F)

Neurosurgical Department of Spedali Riuniti di Livorno, 57124 Livorno, Italy.

Francesco Pasqualetti (F)

Radiotherapy Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, 56126 Pisa, Italy.

Nicola Montemurro (N)

Department of Neurosurgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, 56126 Pisa, Italy.

Paolo Aretini (P)

Fondazione Pisana per la Scienza, San Giuliano Terme, 56017 Pisa, Italy.

Orazio Santo Santonocito (OS)

Neurosurgical Department of Spedali Riuniti di Livorno, 57124 Livorno, Italy.

Anna Luisa Di Stefano (AL)

Neurosurgical Department of Spedali Riuniti di Livorno, 57124 Livorno, Italy.

Chiara Maria Mazzanti (CM)

Fondazione Pisana per la Scienza, San Giuliano Terme, 56017 Pisa, Italy.

Classifications MeSH