Validation of a New and Straightforward Algorithm to Evaluate Signal Quality during ECG Monitoring with Wearable Devices Used in a Clinical Setting.

ECG clinical reliability low-cost technology signal quality evaluation wearable devices

Journal

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2306-5354
Titre abrégé: Bioengineering (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101676056

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 Feb 2024
Historique:
received: 12 01 2024
revised: 03 02 2024
accepted: 23 02 2024
medline: 27 3 2024
pubmed: 27 3 2024
entrez: 27 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Wearable devices represent a new approach for monitoring key clinical parameters, such as ECG signals, for research and health purposes. These devices could outcompete medical devices in terms of affordability and use in out-clinic settings, allowing remote monitoring. The major limitation, especially when compared to implantable devices, is the presence of artifacts. Several authors reported a relevant percentage of recording time with poor/unusable traces for ECG, potentially hampering the use of these devices for this purpose. For this reason, it is of the utmost importance to develop a simple and inexpensive system enabling the user of the wearable devices to have immediate feedback on the quality of the acquired signal, allowing for real-time correction. A simple algorithm that can work in real time to verify the quality of the ECG signal (acceptable and unacceptable) was validated. Based on simple statistical parameters, the algorithm was blindly tested by comparison with ECG tracings previously classified by two expert cardiologists. The classifications of 7200 10s-signal samples acquired on 20 patients with a commercial wearable ECG monitor were compared. The algorithm has an overall efficiency of approximately 95%, with a sensitivity of 94.7% and a specificity of 95.3%. The results demonstrate that even a simple algorithm can be used to classify signal coarseness, and this could allow real-time intervention by the subject or the technician.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Wearable devices represent a new approach for monitoring key clinical parameters, such as ECG signals, for research and health purposes. These devices could outcompete medical devices in terms of affordability and use in out-clinic settings, allowing remote monitoring. The major limitation, especially when compared to implantable devices, is the presence of artifacts. Several authors reported a relevant percentage of recording time with poor/unusable traces for ECG, potentially hampering the use of these devices for this purpose. For this reason, it is of the utmost importance to develop a simple and inexpensive system enabling the user of the wearable devices to have immediate feedback on the quality of the acquired signal, allowing for real-time correction.
METHODS METHODS
A simple algorithm that can work in real time to verify the quality of the ECG signal (acceptable and unacceptable) was validated. Based on simple statistical parameters, the algorithm was blindly tested by comparison with ECG tracings previously classified by two expert cardiologists.
RESULTS RESULTS
The classifications of 7200 10s-signal samples acquired on 20 patients with a commercial wearable ECG monitor were compared. The algorithm has an overall efficiency of approximately 95%, with a sensitivity of 94.7% and a specificity of 95.3%.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The results demonstrate that even a simple algorithm can be used to classify signal coarseness, and this could allow real-time intervention by the subject or the technician.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38534496
pii: bioengineering11030222
doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11030222
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Auteurs

Luca Neri (L)

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.

Ilaria Gallelli (I)

IRCCS AOU, Policlinico di S. Orsola, 40138 Bologna, Italy.

Massimo Dall'Olio (M)

IRCCS AOU, Policlinico di S. Orsola, 40138 Bologna, Italy.

Jessica Lago (J)

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.

Claudio Borghi (C)

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
IRCCS AOU, Policlinico di S. Orsola, 40138 Bologna, Italy.

Igor Diemberger (I)

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
IRCCS AOU, Policlinico di S. Orsola, 40138 Bologna, Italy.

Ivan Corazza (I)

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.

Classifications MeSH