Biomimetic Scaffolds-A Novel Approach to Three Dimensional Cell Culture Techniques for Potential Implementation in Tissue Engineering.

3D bioprinting 4D materials biologically derived materials biomimetic scaffolds

Journal

Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2079-4991
Titre abrégé: Nanomaterials (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101610216

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 12 01 2024
revised: 28 02 2024
accepted: 14 03 2024
medline: 27 3 2024
pubmed: 27 3 2024
entrez: 27 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Biomimetic scaffolds imitate native tissue and can take a multidimensional form. They are biocompatible and can influence cellular metabolism, making them attractive bioengineering platforms. The use of biomimetic scaffolds adds complexity to traditional cell cultivation methods. The most commonly used technique involves cultivating cells on a flat surface in a two-dimensional format due to its simplicity. A three-dimensional (3D) format can provide a microenvironment for surrounding cells. There are two main techniques for obtaining 3D structures based on the presence of scaffolding. Scaffold-free techniques consist of spheroid technologies. Meanwhile, scaffold techniques contain organoids and all constructs that use various types of scaffolds, ranging from decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) through hydrogels that are one of the most extensively studied forms of potential scaffolds for 3D culture up to 4D bioprinted biomaterials. 3D bioprinting is one of the most important techniques used to create biomimetic scaffolds. The versatility of this technique allows the use of many different types of inks, mainly hydrogels, as well as cells and inorganic substances. Increasing amounts of data provide evidence of vast potential of biomimetic scaffolds usage in tissue engineering and personalized medicine, with the main area of potential application being the regeneration of skin and musculoskeletal systems. Recent papers also indicate increasing amounts of in vivo tests of products based on biomimetic scaffolds, which further strengthen the importance of this branch of tissue engineering and emphasize the need for extensive research to provide safe for humansbiomimetic tissues and organs. In this review article, we provide a review of the recent advancements in the field of biomimetic scaffolds preceded by an overview of cell culture technologies that led to the development of biomimetic scaffold techniques as the most complex type of cell culture.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38535679
pii: nano14060531
doi: 10.3390/nano14060531
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Auteurs

Tomasz Górnicki (T)

Division of Histology and Embryology, Department of Human Morphology and Embryology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-368 Wroclaw, Poland.

Jakub Lambrinow (J)

Division of Histology and Embryology, Department of Human Morphology and Embryology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-368 Wroclaw, Poland.

Afsaneh Golkar-Narenji (A)

Prestage Department of Poultry Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA.

Krzysztof Data (K)

Division of Anatomy, Department of Human Morphology and Embryology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-368 Wroclaw, Poland.

Dominika Domagała (D)

Division of Anatomy, Department of Human Morphology and Embryology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-368 Wroclaw, Poland.

Julia Niebora (J)

Division of Anatomy, Department of Human Morphology and Embryology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-368 Wroclaw, Poland.

Maryam Farzaneh (M)

Fertility, Infertility and Perinatology Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz P.O. Box 6193673111, Iran.

Paul Mozdziak (P)

Prestage Department of Poultry Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA.

Maciej Zabel (M)

Division of Histology and Embryology, Department of Human Morphology and Embryology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-368 Wroclaw, Poland.

Paweł Antosik (P)

Department of Veterinary Surgery, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, 87-100 Torun, Poland.

Dorota Bukowska (D)

Department of Diagnostics and Clinical Sciences, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, 87-100 Torun, Poland.

Kornel Ratajczak (K)

Department of Veterinary Surgery, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, 87-100 Torun, Poland.

Marzenna Podhorska-Okołów (M)

Division of Ultrastructure Research, Department of Human Morphology and Embryology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-368 Wroclaw, Poland.

Piotr Dzięgiel (P)

Division of Histology and Embryology, Department of Human Morphology and Embryology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-368 Wroclaw, Poland.

Bartosz Kempisty (B)

Division of Anatomy, Department of Human Morphology and Embryology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-368 Wroclaw, Poland.
Department of Veterinary Surgery, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, 87-100 Torun, Poland.
Physiology Graduate Faculty, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27613, USA.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital and Masaryk University, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic.

Classifications MeSH