The Milan score: A novel manometric tool for a more efficient diagnosis of gastro-esophageal reflux disease.
Milan score
esophagogastric junction
gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)
high resolution manometry
nomogram
Journal
United European gastroenterology journal
ISSN: 2050-6414
Titre abrégé: United European Gastroenterol J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101606807
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Mar 2024
27 Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
01
02
2024
accepted:
04
03
2024
medline:
27
3
2024
pubmed:
27
3
2024
entrez:
27
3
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
A definitive diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) depends on endoscopic and/or pH-study criteria. However, high resolution manometry (HRM) can identify factors predicting GERD, such as ineffective esophageal motility (IEM), esophago-gastric junction contractile integral (EGJ-CI), evaluating esophagogastric junction (EGJ) type and straight leg raise (SLR) maneuver response. We aimed to build and externally validate a manometric score (Milan Score) to stratify the risk and severity of the disease in patients undergoing HRM for suspected GERD. A population of 295 consecutive patients undergoing HRM and pH-study for persistent typical or atypical GERD symptoms was prospectively enrolled to build a model and a nomogram that provides a risk score for AET > 6%. Collected HRM data included IEM, EGJ-CI, EGJ type and SLR. A supplemental cohort of patients undergoing HRM and pH-study was also prospectively enrolled in 13 high-volume esophageal function laboratories across the world in order to validate the model. Discrimination and calibration were used to assess model's accuracy. Gastroesophageal reflux disease was defined as acid exposure time >6%. Out of the analyzed variables, SLR response and EGJ subtype 3 had the highest impact on the score (odd ratio 18.20 and 3.87, respectively). The external validation cohort consisted of 233 patients. In the validation model, the corrected Harrel c-index was 0.90. The model-fitting optimism adjusted calibration slope was 0.93 and the integrated calibration index was 0.07, indicating good calibration. A novel HRM score for GERD diagnosis has been created and validated. The MS might be a useful screening tool to stratify the risk and the severity of GERD, allowing a more comprehensive pathophysiologic assessment of the anti-reflux barrier. ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT05851482).
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05851482']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Authors. United European Gastroenterology Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of United European Gastroenterology.
Références
Gyawali CP, Yadlapati R, Fass R, Katzka D, Pandolfino J, Savarino E, et al. Updates to the modern diagnosis of GERD: Lyon consensus 2.0. Gut. 2023;21(2):361–371. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37734911. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl‐2023‐330616
Gyawali CP, Roman S, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Keller J, Pandolfino JE, et al. International GERD consensus working group. Classification of esophageal motor findings in gastro‐esophageal reflux disease: conclusions from an international consensus group. Neuro Gastroenterol Motil. 2017;29(12). PMID: 28544357. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.13104
Kahrilas PJ, Mittal RK, Bor S, Kohn GP, Lenglinger J, Mittal SK, et al. Chicago classification update (v4.0): technical review of high‐resolution manometry metrics for EGJ barrier function. Neuro Gastroenterol Motil. 2021;33(10):e14113. Epub 2021 Mar 2. PMID: 33655610; PMCID: PMC8410874. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14113
Tolone S, de Cassan C, de Bortoli N, Roman S, Galeazzi F, Salvador R, et al. Esophagogastric junction morphology is associated with a positive impedance‐pH monitoring in patients with GERD. Neuro Gastroenterol Motil. 2015;27(8):1175–1182. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12606
Nicodème F, Pipa‐Muniz M, Khanna K, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE. Quantifying esophagogastric junction contractility with a novel HRM topographic metric, the EGJ‐Contractile Integral: normative values and preliminary evaluation in PPI non‐responders. Neuro Gastroenterol Motil. 2014;26(3):353–360. Epub 2013 Dec 3. PMID: 24460814; PMCID: PMC4605557. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12267
Gyawali CP, Zerbib F, Bhatia S, Cisternas D, Coss‐Adame E, Lazarescu A, et al. Chicago classification update (V4.0): technical review on diagnostic criteria for ineffective esophageal motility and absent contractility. Neuro Gastroenterol Motil. 2021;33(8):e14134. Epub 2021 Mar 26. PMID: 33768698. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14134
Triadafilopoulos G, Tandon A, Shetler KP, Clarke J. Clinical and pH study characteristics in reflux patients with and without ineffective oesophageal motility (IEM). BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2016;3(1):e000126. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast‐2016‐000126
Gyawali CP, Sifrim D, Carlson DA, Hawn M, Katzka DA, Pandolfino JE, et al. Ineffective esophageal motility: concepts, future directions, and conclusions from the Stanford 2018 symposium. Neuro Gastroenterol Motil. 2019;31(9):e13584. Epub 2019 Apr 11. PMID: 30974032; PMCID: PMC9380027. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.13584
Ribolsi M, Holloway RH, Emerenziani S, Balestrieri P, Cicala M. Impedance‐high resolution manometry analysis of patients with nonerosive reflux disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12(1):52–57. Epub 2013 Jul 23. PMID: 23891920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2013.06.034
Butterfield DG, Struthers JE, Jr, Showalter JP. A test of gastroesophageal sphincter competence. The common cavity test. Am J Dig Dis. 1972;17(5):415–421. PMID: 5024985.
Siboni S, Kristo I, Rogers BD, De Bortoli N, Hobson A, Louie B, et al. Improving the diagnostic yield of high‐resolution esophageal manometry for GERD: the "straight leg‐raise" international study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;19(7):1761.e1–1770.e1. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36270615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2022.10.008
ClinicalTri.als.gov [Internet]. Validation of HRM score for the GERD diagnosis (HRM nomogram). Identifier NCT05851482. Bethesda: National Library of Medicine (US).
Jones R, Junghard O, Dent J, Vakil N, Halling K, Wernersson B, et al. Development of the GerdQ, a tool for the diagnosis and management of gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease in primary care. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;30(10):1030–1038. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365‐2036.2009.04142.x
Velanovich V. The development of the GERD‐HRQL symptom severity instrument. Dis Esophagus. 2007;20(2):130–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442‐2050.2007.00658.x
Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI). J Voice. 2002;16(2):274–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0892‐1997(02)00097‐8
Yadlapati R, Kahrilas PJ, Fox MR, Bredenoord, AJ, Prakash Gyawali, C, Roman, S, et al., . Esophageal motility disorders on high‐resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0©. Neuro Gastroenterol Motil. 2021;33(1):e14058, https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14058
Savarino E, Frazzoni M, Marabotto E, Zentilin P, Iovino P, Costantini M, et al. A SIGE‐SINGEM‐AIGO technical review on the clinical use of esophageal reflux monitoring. Dig Liver Dis. 2020;52(9):966–980. Epub 2020 Jun 6. PMID: 32513632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2020.04.031
Gyawali CP, Rogers B, Frazzoni M, Savarino E, Roman S, Sifrim D. Inter‐reviewer variability in interpretation of pH‐impedance studies: the wingate consensus. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;19(9):1976–1978.e1. Epub 2020 Sep 2. PMID: 32890752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2020.09.002
Frazzoni M, Savarino E, de Bortoli N, Martinucci I, Furnari M, Frazzoni L, et al. Analyses of the post‐reflux swallow‐induced peristaltic wave index and nocturnal baseline impedance parameters increase the diagnostic yield of impedance‐pH monitoring of patients with reflux disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14(1):40–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2015.06.026
Li H, Johnson T. Wilcoxon's signed‐rank statistic: what null hypothesis and why it matters. Pharm Stat. 2014;13(5):281–285. Epub 2014 Jun 18. PMID: 24943680. https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.1628
Taylor M, Szafron B, Martin GP, Abah U, Smith M, Shackcloth M, et al. North west thoracic surgery collaborative (NWTSC). External validation of six existing multivariable clinical prediction models for short‐term mortality in patients undergoing lung resection. Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg. 2021;59(5):1030–1036. PMID: 33230562. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezaa422
Paul P, Pennell ML, Lemeshow S. Standardizing the power of the Hosmer‐Lemeshow goodness of fit test in large data sets. Stat Med. 2013;32(1):67–80. Epub 2012 Jul 26. PMID: 22833304. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.5525
Katzka DA, Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ. Phenotypes of gastroesophageal reflux disease: where Rome, Lyon, and Montreal meet. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18(4):767–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2019.07.015