The use of Kudoh method for culture of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium africanum in The Gambia.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 02 11 2023
accepted: 20 02 2024
medline: 27 3 2024
pubmed: 27 3 2024
entrez: 27 3 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Mycobacterium tuberculosis culturing remains the gold standard for laboratory diagnosis of tuberculosis. Tuberculosis remains a great public health problem in developing countries like The Gambia, as most of the methods currently used for bacterial isolation are either time-consuming or costly. To evaluate the Kudoh swab method in a West African setting in Gambia, with a particular focus on the method's performance when culturing Mycobacterium africanum West Africa 2 (MAF2) isolates. 75 sputum samples were collected in the Greater Banjul Area and decontaminated in parallel with both the standard N-acetyl-L-Cysteine-NaOH (NALC-NaOH) and the Kudoh swab method in the TB diagnostics laboratory in the Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia between 30th December 2017 and 25th February 2018. These samples were subsequently cultured on standard Löwenstein-Jensen and Modified Ogawa media respectively and incubated at 37°C for mycobacterial growth. Spoligotyping was done to determine if the decontamination and culture methods compared could equally detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycobacterium africanum West Africa 1 and Mycobacterium africanum West Africa 2. Among the 50 smear positives, 35 (70%) were culture-positive with Kudoh and 32 (64%) were culture positive with NALC-NaOH, whilst 7(28%) of the 25 smear negative samples were culture positive with both methods (Table 2). There was no significant difference in recovery between both methods (McNemar's test, p-value = 0.7003), suggesting that the overall positivity rate between the two methods is comparable. There were no differences in time-to-positivity or contamination rate between the methods. However, Kudoh yielded positive cultures that were negative on LJ and vice versa. All findings were irrespective of mycobacterial lineages. The Kudoh method has comparable sensitivity to the NALC-NaOH method for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolates. It is easy to perform and could be an add on option for mycobacterial culture in the field in The Gambia, since it requires less biosafety equipment.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Mycobacterium tuberculosis culturing remains the gold standard for laboratory diagnosis of tuberculosis. Tuberculosis remains a great public health problem in developing countries like The Gambia, as most of the methods currently used for bacterial isolation are either time-consuming or costly.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the Kudoh swab method in a West African setting in Gambia, with a particular focus on the method's performance when culturing Mycobacterium africanum West Africa 2 (MAF2) isolates.
METHOD METHODS
75 sputum samples were collected in the Greater Banjul Area and decontaminated in parallel with both the standard N-acetyl-L-Cysteine-NaOH (NALC-NaOH) and the Kudoh swab method in the TB diagnostics laboratory in the Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia between 30th December 2017 and 25th February 2018. These samples were subsequently cultured on standard Löwenstein-Jensen and Modified Ogawa media respectively and incubated at 37°C for mycobacterial growth. Spoligotyping was done to determine if the decontamination and culture methods compared could equally detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycobacterium africanum West Africa 1 and Mycobacterium africanum West Africa 2.
RESULT RESULTS
Among the 50 smear positives, 35 (70%) were culture-positive with Kudoh and 32 (64%) were culture positive with NALC-NaOH, whilst 7(28%) of the 25 smear negative samples were culture positive with both methods (Table 2). There was no significant difference in recovery between both methods (McNemar's test, p-value = 0.7003), suggesting that the overall positivity rate between the two methods is comparable. There were no differences in time-to-positivity or contamination rate between the methods. However, Kudoh yielded positive cultures that were negative on LJ and vice versa. All findings were irrespective of mycobacterial lineages.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The Kudoh method has comparable sensitivity to the NALC-NaOH method for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolates. It is easy to perform and could be an add on option for mycobacterial culture in the field in The Gambia, since it requires less biosafety equipment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38536821
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300042
pii: PONE-D-23-34900
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0300042

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2024 Jobarteh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Auteurs

Tijan Jobarteh (T)

Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, The Gambia.

Jacob Otu (J)

Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, The Gambia.

Ensa Gitteh (E)

Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, The Gambia.

Francis S Mendy (FS)

Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, The Gambia.

Tutty Isatou Faal-Jawara (TI)

Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, The Gambia.

Boatema Ofori-Anyinam (B)

Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, The Gambia.
Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, United States of America.

Binta Sarr (B)

Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, The Gambia.

Abi Janet Riley (AJ)

Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, The Gambia.

Abigail Ayorinde (A)

Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, The Gambia.

Bouke C de Jong (BC)

Institute for Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.

Beate Kampmann (B)

Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, The Gambia.

Ousman Secka (O)

Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, The Gambia.

Florian Gehre (F)

Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, The Gambia.
Institute for Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Bernhard-Nocht-Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.

Classifications MeSH